America needs a return to a real constitution

[rupol2000]

The current constitution is a forgery and a perversion of the real US constitution adopted after the Revolution. Washington sold the United States to British proteges. This constitution must be rejected.
Here is the real constitution that the left and the trumpster are hiding from the American People

Articles of Confederation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Samofvt]

The current constitution is a forgery and a perversion of the real US constitution adopted after the Revolution. Washington sold the United States to British proteges. This constitution must be rejected.
Here is the real constitution that the left and the trumpster are hiding from the American People

Articles of Confederation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The current constitution is clear and fine.

Those who mis-interpret it or bend it are the perversion

 

[rupol2000]

The current constitution is clear and fine.

Those who mis-interpret it or bend it are the perversion

The fathers did not like this constitution. This is a return to imperialism in a milder form. Washington was against the Fathers, he worked for the British Empire

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

The fathers did not like this constitution. This is a return to imperialism in a milder form. Washington was against the Fathers, he worked for the British Empire

Shut yo goofy ass up

 

[rupol2000]

The name "USA" appeared precisely in the Articles of Confederation. The Philadelphia Conventions are outside Congress, outside the law, they are conspirators and counter-revolutionaries isolated from the USA, traitors to the people of the USA.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I like our constitution
To bad our progressive fag deep state and government doesn't

 

[WinterBorn]

The Founding Fathers approved and ratified the US Constitution, as it was written (after much debate and editing).

 

[rupol2000]

I like our constitution
To bad our progressive fag deep state and government doesn't

The federal faggots were born precisely because of this constitution. In the Real Constitution of the 2nd congress there is only the Senate, and one representative from each state.

 

[rupol2000]

The Founding Fathers approved and ratified the US Constitution, as it was written (after much debate and editing).

I do not believe in this. The Philadelphia Scam was generally out of US policy, they did not have the right to accept any documents.

 

[rupol2000]

The Founding Fathers approved and ratified the US Constitution, as it was written (after much debate and editing).

The Philadelphia Convention was not the legal body of the United States empowered to make laws. How could it submit anything for ratification?

 

[rupol2000]

Congress of the Confederation was legal institution for this only

 

[WinterBorn]

I do not believe in this. The Philadelphia Scam was generally out of US policy, they did not have the right to accept any documents.

Every state sent delegates to the Constitutional conventions. It was most certainly legal. As was the ratification process.

 

[rupol2000]

Every state sent delegates to the Constitutional conventions. It was most certainly legal. As was the ratification process.

No. Under the constitution of the Second Congress, only Congress had the right to do so. It's just a bunch of crooks.

 

[WinterBorn]

No. Under the constitution of the Second Congress, only Congress had the right to do so. It's just a bunch of crooks.

And the Founding Fathers who attended the Constitutional Convention were congressmen. In those days, congressmen were not elected. They were appointed.

 

[rupol2000]

The Constitution in force is the Constitution of the Congress. The United States was created by the Constitution of Congress. The convention did not have the power to change the Constitution of the Congress, much less create a new constitution.

 

[rupol2000]

And the Founding Fathers who attended the Constitutional Convention were congressmen. In those days, congressmen were not elected. They were appointed.

It doesn't matter. And these are not fathers, but foreign agents.

 

[WinterBorn]

No. Under the constitution of the Second Congress, only Congress had the right to do so. It's just a bunch of crooks.

The Second Continental Congress (which passed the Articles of Confederation) actually had no explicit legal right to govern. But they took on the task as was needed.

You have spoken out against the Founding Fathers who owned slaves. The Articles of Confederation was very much a pro-slavery document.

The Articles of Confederation had no executive branch. It also allowed one vote per colony or state, regardless of the size or population.


At any rate, the Articles of Confederation was repealed March 4th, 1789 and replaced it with the US Constitution.

 

[rupol2000]

1787 constitution is out of law

 

[WinterBorn]

The Constitution in force is the Constitution of the Congress. The United States was created by the Constitution of Congress. The convention did not have the power to change the Constitution of the Congress, much less create a new constitution.

Yes, it did. Even under the Articles of Confederation each state or colony had 1 vote. Those votes were cast to repeal the Articles of Confederation.

 

[WinterBorn]

1787 constitution is out of law

No, it is not. It was duly ratified by the 13 colonies.