America First Holds Pro-Nazi Rally, February 20 1939

[BackAgain]

Wrong. Hitler read whatever he was told to read to the public.
But if you think he at all reduced capitalist profits, you are totally wrong.

You’re even more ignorant than your very gullible little pet, surada.

Also, where did this conversation first address any question of “reducing capitalist profits?”

 

[Rigby5]

You are an easy mark. Your confusion is the typeface with which you post.

This discussion isn’t about what he implemented.

Go take a walk. You’re in way over your head

Yes, the point is who was telling Hitler what to do.
And that was the wealthy elite who appointed him.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, the point is who was telling Hitler what to do.
And that was the wealthy elite who appointed him.

Lol. Sure. Sure. Of course. THAT’s “the” point.

 

[Rigby5]

You’re even more ignorant than your very gullible little pet, surada.

Also, where did this conversation first address any question of “reducing capitalist profits?”

Profit sharing is a hallmark of socialism.

 

[BackAgain]

Profit sharing is a hallmark of socialism.

Man. You’re dull. Dull witted.

 

[Mushroom]

Hitler purged the German government of socialists, communists, Jews and Democrats

No, he did not purge the Socialists. He only purged the Communists.

 

[Mushroom]

Nazis were right wing fascists. The furthest thing from a communist possible. They put communists and socialists in concentration camps

No, that was Communists.

Socialism and Communism is not the same thing.

 

[irosie91]

Wrong.
The political rivalry came from the fact the Nazis were anti-socialist and their rivals were socialists.
Look up the meaning of Fascism.
It is a coalition of the wealthy elite.
It is the aristocracy, military officers, and corporate capitalists ( used to be priesthood in ancient Rome, but changed to corporate capitalists by Mussolini).

Socialism is the exact opposite of fascism and the Nazis, and always has been.
It is Hitler who switched.
He started as socialist, but in 1933 turned anti-socialist totally and completely.
Anyone who think Hitler did anything remotely socialist, is utterly ignorant of the actual history.

right----like STALIN was not a socialist

 

[irosie91]

No, he did not purge the Socialists. He only purged the Communists.

he purged all that were not in love with his PERSON AND AGENDA

 

[irosie91]

You’re even more ignorant than your very gullible little pet, surada.

Also, where did this conversation first address any question of “reducing capitalist profits?”

the model most accept of "socialism" is that it is
anti"capitalist"-----in fact Adolf was all things pro-
adolf.

 

[surada]

No, he did not purge the Socialists. He only purged the Communists.

You're wrong. Hitler hated Socialists.. read about the Enabling Act of 1933.

 

[irosie91]

You're wrong. Hitler hated Socialists.. read about the Enabling Act of 1933.

the term "socialist" is as non-specific as are the
terms "left" and "right" Even Baathist pig fascists
like Sadaam Hussein used the term "socialist" as did
the maniacal murderer Khaddaffy-duck

 

[surada]

the term "socialist" is as non-specific as are the
terms "left" and "right" Even Baathist pig fascists
like Sadaam Hussein used the term "socialist" as did
the maniacal murderer Khaddaffy-duck

We are talking specifically about Germany in 1933.

 

[irosie91]

RIGHT Rigs-----you have proven the adage --EVEN A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE PER DAY

 

[irosie91]

We are talking specifically about Germany in 1933.

yes we are. Adolf styled himself a HERO SOCIALIST
IN SUPPORT OF THE GERMAN WORKER. His
philosophy and program was his noble pursuit
(holy jihad) in their favor----to ELEVATE the
common german -----ask Himmler

 

[Failzero]

Wrong.
All companies remained entirely private, and made more profits than ever, through the use of slave labor.
The war effort was paid on a bidding process.
There was zero nationalization of any industry (in Germany).

Wrong , revisionist history will not save you .

 

[Confederate Soldier]

The point is Hitler was far right wing, selected by the wealthy elite, to increase profits through war.
Those who claim Hitler was at all left wing or socialist, are ridiculously uninformed.

He wasn't selected by the elite, lol! He scratched and clawed and murdered his way into power, and started the war to create "living space" for "aryan peoples". France and England had to be defeated because they humiliated Germany at the signing of the treaty of Versailles. He also hated communism, and he wanted to destroy that too. Had nothing to do with rich elites, globalism or any other horseshit like that.

 

[BackAgain]

the model most accept of "socialism" is that it is
anti"capitalist"-----in fact Adolf was all things pro-
adolf.

You can’t define anything, really, just in terms of what it opposes.

Insane Hitler had his own views on what “socialism” was. But regardless of whether it met all the tests of how we usually describe and define socialism, he seems to have appreciated socialism.

 

[Mushroom]

You're wrong. Hitler hated Socialists.. read about the Enabling Act of 1933.

It said nothing about Socialists.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Stalin never was ever remotely communist in any way at all.
He was a bank robber by profession, and totally profit motivated.
A communist has to be for decentralization, so that you can have communal, collective, and cooperative means of production.
When ever you have centralization, that is an arbitrary corrupt and profit motivated, wealth elite of capitalists.

Wrong and absolutely proven wrong

Stalin was a cioimmunist in both practice and ideology. He was a ruthless and bloodthisty dictator whichis precisely what Marx demanded when he stated that a despotic dictatorship of the proletariate would be necessary.

Banks are part of the means of production which means seizing or ropping them is part and parcel of communism.

Communists have to be about centralization and tyrannty that is what the ideology is all about.