Amazing, Six Members of the Clown Car did WHAT?

[Seawytch]

They are they lamely pandering and The FADA is unlikely going to become law. It was introduced six months ago and nothing has come of it.

But that won't stop them for continually trying to push it down our throats.

No doubt. This pledge is simply throwing a little red meat to the religious right.

Quite frankly, I would love to see state and federal public accommodations laws scrapped almost entirely.

You would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to you based on the fact that you are gay?

I would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to any person and for whatever reason. If people find those business practices objectionable than they will take their duckets elsewhere. If their business fails then they have no one to blame but themselves. I wouldn't to give my money to that business anyway.

People that say things like that, don't live in a rural area I've found. See, there is no place else to take my "duckets" if the honey dipper doesn't want to pump the fag's septic tank or top the queer's tree. If the local store doesn't want to sell to the dykes...then what?

Oh, right...we're supposed to grow our own food.

 

[Seawytch]

The OP is a lie.

How so? You really should be a little more specific.

 

[rightwinger]

I support God's laws.

.....and God hates Fags

 

[Freewill]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

 

[rightwinger]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

You tell em mister...

and I don't have to serve negroes if I don't want to. They can start their own business for their kind

 

[Seawytch]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

So you've been protesting this "government intrusion" since 1965 when Public Accommodation laws were passed at the Federal level, right? You've been asking your congressman to repeal Title II of the Civil Rights Act, right?

No, you fuckers want to have your cake and eat it too...pun intended. You like those PA laws that says I can't refuse to serve a Christian...you just don't like the ones that say the Christian has to serve me.

 

[TNHarley]

I dont see anything wrong with individual liberty. If the asshole doesn't want to bake you a cake, go next door. I promise, it isn't THAT hard..

 

[Freewill]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

You tell em mister...

and I don't have to serve negroes if I don't want to. They can start their own business for their kind

We have been over this and being a black person and being gay are not the same thing. Why do you continue to down grade black people by trying to tie them into sexual proclivity?

 

[Seawytch]

I dont see anything wrong with individual liberty. If the asshole doesn't want to bake you a cake, go next door. I promise, it isn't THAT hard..

Yeah, those N words didn't need to sit at white lunch counters...they got the same food out the back door, right?

 

[Seawytch]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

You tell em mister...

and I don't have to serve negroes if I don't want to. They can start their own business for their kind

We have been over this and being a black person and being gay are not the same thing. Why do you continue to down grade black people by trying to tie them into sexual proclivity?

See, that's the part you bigots don't get. We're not comparing race and sexual orientation...we're comparing you bigots (and you're exactly the same).

 

[Freewill]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

So you've been protesting this "government intrusion" since 1965 when Public Accommodation laws were passed at the Federal level, right? You've been asking your congressman to repeal Title II of the Civil Rights Act, right?

No, you fuckers want to have your cake and eat it too...pun intended. You like those PA laws that says I can't refuse to serve a Christian...you just don't like the ones that say the Christian has to serve me.

Nope, what it is, is you want to dictate your beliefs and force them onto everyone else, as if your beliefs are the only true beliefs.

There is a vast, VAST difference between being born black and gay marriage. I would think it an insult to black people to even make the connection.

 

[TNHarley]

I dont see anything wrong with individual liberty. If the asshole doesn't want to bake you a cake, go next door. I promise, it isn't THAT hard..

Yeah, those N words didn't need to sit at white lunch counters...they got the same food out the back door, right?

Again, I see nothing wrong with what people do with their own property. If people want to be assholes, let them.
"own property" kinda a oxymoron in America, ey?

 

[Seawytch]

I dont see anything wrong with individual liberty. If the asshole doesn't want to bake you a cake, go next door. I promise, it isn't THAT hard..

Yeah, those N words didn't need to sit at white lunch counters...they got the same food out the back door, right?

Again, I see nothing wrong with what people do with their own property. If people want to be assholes, let them.
"own property" kinda a oxymoron in America, ey?

What's wrong is that it often violates law.

Again, I haven't seen anyone trying to repeal Title II of the CRA, have you? No...they just want special little "I hate fags" carve outs for their bigotry.

 

[Seawytch]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

So you've been protesting this "government intrusion" since 1965 when Public Accommodation laws were passed at the Federal level, right? You've been asking your congressman to repeal Title II of the Civil Rights Act, right?

No, you fuckers want to have your cake and eat it too...pun intended. You like those PA laws that says I can't refuse to serve a Christian...you just don't like the ones that say the Christian has to serve me.

Nope, what it is, is you want to dictate your beliefs and force them onto everyone else, as if your beliefs are the only true beliefs.

There is a vast, VAST difference between being born black and gay marriage. I would think it an insult to black people to even make the connection.

Nope... we want you to follow the law or change it. Have you called your congressman to get Title II of the CRA repealed?

There is zero difference in the bigots and their need to discriminate. Racist bigots and anti gay bigots are exactly the same...right down to the language they use.

 

[Freewill]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

You tell em mister...

and I don't have to serve negroes if I don't want to. They can start their own business for their kind

We have been over this and being a black person and being gay are not the same thing. Why do you continue to down grade black people by trying to tie them into sexual proclivity?

See, that's the part you bigots don't get. We're not comparing race and sexual orientation...we're comparing you bigots (and you're exactly the same).

if it is bigoted to uphold the COTUS and personal freedom then I guess I am guilty. If forcing your belief, and I mean YOURS, onto other people is not bigoted then I think we need to look up the definition. See I can say that I don't agree with the baker, but I do agree with his right to be an ahole and refuse to sanction gay marriage because of his religious belief. Much like I would support the Muslim that refuses to take a cab fare because of alcohol or a dog.

YOU on the other hand can't see both sides of ANYTHING. It is your way or the highway, which is the very definition of bigotry:

big·ot·ed
ˈbiɡədəd/
adjective

1. having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others.

 

[TNHarley]

I dont see anything wrong with individual liberty. If the asshole doesn't want to bake you a cake, go next door. I promise, it isn't THAT hard..

Yeah, those N words didn't need to sit at white lunch counters...they got the same food out the back door, right?

Again, I see nothing wrong with what people do with their own property. If people want to be assholes, let them.
"own property" kinda a oxymoron in America, ey?

What's wrong is that it often violates law.

Again, I haven't seen anyone trying to repeal Title II of the CRA, have you? No...they just want special little "I hate fags" carve outs for their bigotry.

If they were worried about restoring liberty to everyone, then that is what they should do. But they don't. Just pandering. None of the establishment gives a fuck about the people.

 

[Freewill]

"Six of the Republican candidates vying for the presidency have signed a pledge promising to support legislation during their first 100 days in the White House that would use the guise of “religious liberty” to give individuals and businesses the right to openly discriminate against LGBT people.

"Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee vowed to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), legislation that would prohibit the federal government from stopping discrimination by people or businesses that believe “marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman” or that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

So you've been protesting this "government intrusion" since 1965 when Public Accommodation laws were passed at the Federal level, right? You've been asking your congressman to repeal Title II of the Civil Rights Act, right?

No, you fuckers want to have your cake and eat it too...pun intended. You like those PA laws that says I can't refuse to serve a Christian...you just don't like the ones that say the Christian has to serve me.

Nope, what it is, is you want to dictate your beliefs and force them onto everyone else, as if your beliefs are the only true beliefs.

There is a vast, VAST difference between being born black and gay marriage. I would think it an insult to black people to even make the connection.

Nope... we want you to follow the law or change it. Have you called your congressman to get Title II of the CRA repealed?

There is zero difference in the bigots and their need to discriminate. Racist bigots and anti gay bigots are exactly the same...right down to the language they use.

Sing along folks......... cause Swytch says it soooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[Seawytch]

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

So you've been protesting this "government intrusion" since 1965 when Public Accommodation laws were passed at the Federal level, right? You've been asking your congressman to repeal Title II of the Civil Rights Act, right?

No, you fuckers want to have your cake and eat it too...pun intended. You like those PA laws that says I can't refuse to serve a Christian...you just don't like the ones that say the Christian has to serve me.

Nope, what it is, is you want to dictate your beliefs and force them onto everyone else, as if your beliefs are the only true beliefs.

There is a vast, VAST difference between being born black and gay marriage. I would think it an insult to black people to even make the connection.

Nope... we want you to follow the law or change it. Have you called your congressman to get Title II of the CRA repealed?

There is zero difference in the bigots and their need to discriminate. Racist bigots and anti gay bigots are exactly the same...right down to the language they use.

Sing along folks......... cause Swytch says it soooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Oh, it's not just me saying it...a historian says it too.

Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

 

[mdk]

They are they lamely pandering and The FADA is unlikely going to become law. It was introduced six months ago and nothing has come of it.

But that won't stop them for continually trying to push it down our throats.

No doubt. This pledge is simply throwing a little red meat to the religious right.

Quite frankly, I would love to see state and federal public accommodations laws scrapped almost entirely.

You would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to you based on the fact that you are gay?

I would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to any person and for whatever reason. If people find those business practices objectionable than they will take their duckets elsewhere. If their business fails then they have no one to blame but themselves. I wouldn't to give my money to that business anyway.

People that say things like that, don't live in a rural area I've found. See, there is no place else to take my "duckets" if the honey dipper doesn't want to pump the fag's septic tank or top the queer's tree. If the local store doesn't want to sell to the dykes...then what?

Oh, right...we're supposed to grow our own food.

This could already occur in rural areas of states that don't have protections for gay people; however, it isn't. The backlash from the public would be enormous.

To assuage the fears of people, certain services would be deemed essential and they would have to accommodate people regardless.

 

[Seawytch]

This is because for all the crying these phuckheads do about privacy and individualism, they constantly vote and endorse MORE government intrusion into our lives, not less.

They want to know who is gay and who isn't. Who is having sex and who isn't. Who wants to start a family and who doesn't. And yet the uni-browed rightwingers just can't connect the dots.

So, in your world, fining a person for not making a cake is not government intrusion but allowing a person to have religious beliefs, however contrary to yours, is government intrusion? Me thinks you have something backwards.

You tell em mister...

and I don't have to serve negroes if I don't want to. They can start their own business for their kind

We have been over this and being a black person and being gay are not the same thing. Why do you continue to down grade black people by trying to tie them into sexual proclivity?

See, that's the part you bigots don't get. We're not comparing race and sexual orientation...we're comparing you bigots (and you're exactly the same).

if it is bigoted to uphold the COTUS and personal freedom then I guess I am guilty. If forcing your belief, and I mean YOURS, onto other people is not bigoted then I think we need to look up the definition. See I can say that I don't agree with the baker, but I do agree with his right to be an ahole and refuse to sanction gay marriage because of his religious belief. Much like I would support the Muslim that refuses to take a cab fare because of alcohol or a dog.

YOU on the other hand can't see both sides of ANYTHING. It is your way or the highway, which is the very definition of bigotry:

big·ot·ed
ˈbiɡədəd/
adjective

1. having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others.

Public accommodation laws have been found to be Constitutional.

Oh, but you guys aren't trying to repeal PA laws are you? Nope...you want special little "we hate the gays" carve outs just for YOUR bigotry.

If this proposed law were ever to go into effect, how quickly would ya'll pitch a fit and fall into it if this happened?