What religion teaches not serving black people?
Another red herring.
Let me quote Rabbi to
Rabbi:
"They claim it violates their religious beliefs. Have you examined their souls or something?"
And the racists were just as sure of THEIR bible versus as the anti gay bigots are of theirs.
“
Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red and he placed them on separate continents. . . . The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”
Judge Leon M. Bazile
Anecdote is not evidence.
Next.
Your words Rabbi...
"They claim it violates their religious beliefs. Have you examined their souls or something?"
I have no idea whether those were his religious beliefs or not. In any case he's been dead for years.
Another failed attempt at a point by Seabytch.
So original...Seabytch. Did you break your arm patting yourself on the back for that one?
It's a FACT, Rabbi, that people had (and still have) a religious objection to desegregation and interracial marriage. We did not grant these bigots exceptions to our laws, why should anti gay bigots get to ignore laws when we didn't let racist bigots do it?
There was also resistance rooted in religion to laws barring discrimination in public accommodations and education. For example, a barbeque franchise resisted compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, refusing to serve African-Americans on the ground that the Act “contravene[d] the will of God.”29 The court rejected the defense, stating that, while the franchise owner “has a constitutional right to espouse the religious beliefs of his own choosing . . . he does not have the absolute right to exercise and practice such beliefs in utter disregard of the clear constitutional rights of other citizens.” Most famously, Bob Jones University and its companion plaintiff, Goldsboro Christian Schools, invoked religion to resist integration in education.31 Goldsboro regarded “[c]ultural or biological mixing of the races . . . as a violation of God’s command,”32 and sponsors of Bob Jones University maintained that “the Bible forbids interracial dating and marriage.”33 In the Supreme Court, the schools argued that the loss of their tax-exempt status because of their discriminatory policies violated their Free Exercise rights. The Supreme Court rejected the claim, reasoning that “the interests asserted by petitioners cannot be accommodated with [the] compelling governmental interest” in “eradicating racial discrimination in education—discrimination that prevailed, with official approval, for the first 165 years of this Nation’s constitutional history.”