Amazing, Six Members of the Clown Car did WHAT?

[Seawytch]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

 

[Iceweasel]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

 

[Seawytch]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Where did I say it was a race? It's an immutable trait, like race, but it's not race. I think I see your confusion. You think I'm comparing race to sexual orientation...I'm not. I simply compared a bigot to a bigot and there is little to no difference between the two.

Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

The purity of public morals," the court declared, "the moral and physical development of both races….require that they should be kept distinct and separate… that connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them, should be prohibited by positive law, and be subject to no evasion.

 

[Redfish]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

 

[rightwinger]

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

 

[rightwinger]

So you agree it's a choice. Good.

Religion is a choice....you are free to pick another one if it interferes with your work

You keep repeating that like it's true. It is not. The Constitution protects exercise of religion. And the Supreme Court agrees.

Of course it is true.....people get to pick their religion
Sexuality? Not so much

People pick a religion that hates gays. Then expect gays to conform to their hatreds

Mere assertion by the uber-hack of USMB.
Maybe gays should choose not being gay instead.

If your religion is telling you that God hates fags and you need to do everything you can to oppress them......you are free to choose another religion
Gays are not free to marry those they are not attracted to.

Religion has always been a choice
There is no reason anyone has to choose to belong to a religion of hate

 

[Redfish]

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

almost right, society did not decide it, 5 out of 9 old farts in black robes decided it.

"society" in the blue state of California voted it down twice.

 

[Redfish]

Religion is a choice....you are free to pick another one if it interferes with your work

You keep repeating that like it's true. It is not. The Constitution protects exercise of religion. And the Supreme Court agrees.

Of course it is true.....people get to pick their religion
Sexuality? Not so much

People pick a religion that hates gays. Then expect gays to conform to their hatreds

Mere assertion by the uber-hack of USMB.
Maybe gays should choose not being gay instead.

If your religion is telling you that God hates fags and you need to do everything you can to oppress them......you are free to choose another religion
Gays are not free to marry those they are not attracted to.

Religion has always been a choice
There is no reason anyone has to choose to belong to a religion of hate

so you are encouraging muslims to leave islam (the religion of hate) ?

 

[Wry Catcher]

You keep repeating that like it's true. It is not. The Constitution protects exercise of religion. And the Supreme Court agrees.

Of course it is true.....people get to pick their religion
Sexuality? Not so much

People pick a religion that hates gays. Then expect gays to conform to their hatreds

Mere assertion by the uber-hack of USMB.
Maybe gays should choose not being gay instead.

If your religion is telling you that God hates fags and you need to do everything you can to oppress them......you are free to choose another religion
Gays are not free to marry those they are not attracted to.

Religion has always been a choice
There is no reason anyone has to choose to belong to a religion of hate

so you are encouraging muslims to leave islam (the religion of hate) ?

Westboro Baptist Church ring a bell?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

 

[Iceweasel]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

 

[The Rabbi]

It is a choice. You have stated so yourself.
So choose not to be gay and all problems go away.

No I did not state being gay is a choice, acting on it is. Being gay is not a choice any more than being straight is a choice. You're born with your inclinations, you don't choose them. I did not choose to be attracted to women, I only choose to act upon my attractions (and as often as life allows )

You chose the lifestyle. You chose to act on your inclinations. When pedophiles do that we prosecute them. We do not prosecute people for having inclinations to pedophilia.

You're comparing consenting adults with pedophiles. Talk about a strawman. That's the strawmen of strawmen. We choose to act upon our inclinations just like heterosexuals do.

So it is a choice. Thank you. So you can choose to refrain from acting out and causing yourself problems. Why should society tolerate people acting out and expecting everyone else to go along? Esp for 3% of the population.

,
Blacks marrying whites is a choice Rabbi. What percentage of the population interracially marry, Rabbi?

We're not going back in the closet so the bigot Rabbi won't feel all "uncomfortable".

Gays are not Negroes c.1960. No one has a choice of being a Negro. People can choose to be gay. You've admitted it yourself.

 

[The Rabbi]

So you agree it's a choice. Good.

Religion is a choice....you are free to pick another one if it interferes with your work

You keep repeating that like it's true. It is not. The Constitution protects exercise of religion. And the Supreme Court agrees.

Of course it is true.....people get to pick their religion
Sexuality? Not so much

People pick a religion that hates gays. Then expect gays to conform to their hatreds

Mere assertion by the uber-hack of USMB.
Maybe gays should choose not being gay instead.

If your religion is telling you that God hates fags and you need to do everything you can to oppress them......you are free to choose another religion
Gays are not free to marry those they are not attracted to.

You are free to be an obtuse asshole and say the same thing over and over. It is right you exercise daily!

 

[The Rabbi]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

 

[Iceweasel]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

 

[Dana7360]

You would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to you based on the fact that you are gay?

I would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to any person and for whatever reason. If people find those business practices have objectionable than they will take their duckets elsewhere. If their business fails then they have no one to blame but themselves. I wouldn't to give my money to that business anyway.

What about those who live in remote rural areas? Places that are hundreds of miles from the nearest next town?

Areas that have only one store. That one store won't allow you inside to buy food just because you're gay.

Where are you going to get food or the necessities of life?

Or say the gas station? They won't let you get gas because you're gay. Where are you going to get gas?

Even though your tax dollars paid for the streets that the store owner uses for trucks to bring food and other life necessities to his store to sell. Even though your tax dollars is paying for the police and fire department that serve that store.

Or the private company that owns the electricity or natural gas that is used to electrify and heat homes? Is it fair that they deny you electricity or gas just because you're gay?

Do you think it's fair for someone to deny you food or gas or anything just because you're gay and you have no other place to get those things?

I already gave answers to these concerns.

So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

 

[The Rabbi]

I would like businesses to be permitted to deny service to any person and for whatever reason. If people find those business practices have objectionable than they will take their duckets elsewhere. If their business fails then they have no one to blame but themselves. I wouldn't to give my money to that business anyway.

What about those who live in remote rural areas? Places that are hundreds of miles from the nearest next town?

Areas that have only one store. That one store won't allow you inside to buy food just because you're gay.

Where are you going to get food or the necessities of life?

Or say the gas station? They won't let you get gas because you're gay. Where are you going to get gas?

Even though your tax dollars paid for the streets that the store owner uses for trucks to bring food and other life necessities to his store to sell. Even though your tax dollars is paying for the police and fire department that serve that store.

Or the private company that owns the electricity or natural gas that is used to electrify and heat homes? Is it fair that they deny you electricity or gas just because you're gay?

Do you think it's fair for someone to deny you food or gas or anything just because you're gay and you have no other place to get those things?

I already gave answers to these concerns.

So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. Fuck those people.

 

[Seawytch]

No I did not state being gay is a choice, acting on it is. Being gay is not a choice any more than being straight is a choice. You're born with your inclinations, you don't choose them. I did not choose to be attracted to women, I only choose to act upon my attractions (and as often as life allows )

You chose the lifestyle. You chose to act on your inclinations. When pedophiles do that we prosecute them. We do not prosecute people for having inclinations to pedophilia.

You're comparing consenting adults with pedophiles. Talk about a strawman. That's the strawmen of strawmen. We choose to act upon our inclinations just like heterosexuals do.

So it is a choice. Thank you. So you can choose to refrain from acting out and causing yourself problems. Why should society tolerate people acting out and expecting everyone else to go along? Esp for 3% of the population.

,
Blacks marrying whites is a choice Rabbi. What percentage of the population interracially marry, Rabbi?

We're not going back in the closet so the bigot Rabbi won't feel all "uncomfortable".

Gays are not Negroes c.1960. No one has a choice of being a Negro. People can choose to be gay. You've admitted it yourself.

Nope. Never once said being gay was a choice. I understand lying is all you have. The attractions are not a choice, acting upon them is. There is no reason for gays not to act upon their natural inclinations with consenting adult members of the same sex anymore than for heterosexuals to act or not to act upon their inclinations for the opposite sex.

Really Rabbi, "negro"? 50 years ago, you'd be the one supporting religious objections to interracial marriage. Same bigots, different decade.

 

[Seawytch]

Yes everyone who objects to homosexuality is a bigot.

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Nope...but when you equate gays to pedophiles and fight tooth and nail against gay equality...yeah, your'e a bigot.