Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds

[Bob Blaylock]

One little monkey swinging in a tree,
Teasing Mr. Alligator “Can't catch me!”
Along came Mr. Alligator quiet as can be,
And snatched that monkey out of that tree!​

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Twinkle Toes Tangents "

* Biological Sound Nest *

One little monkey swinging in a tree,
Teasing Mr. Alligator “Can't catch me!”
Along came Mr. Alligator quiet as can be,
And snatched that monkey out of that tree!​

Geographically , monkeys live in proximity of crocodiles ; crocodiles and alligators have entirely different dispositions .

Therefore , infer for your self about validity of other comments in the context of that children song .

With a tale and a boon , the persona of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanuman mocks you again , " ha nu man ! " .

Due hue ewe proffer any credible edict or fortuitous verbs ?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Five Fives "

" Aught Opportunity Leverage Tools "
* Diffusion Well Planned Entropy *

Legitimate aggression. What's your take on that?

It has been supposed in some sources that among a general populace a median intelligence quotient of ninety or greater is a prerequisite to establishment of stable democracy .
As an extreme emphasis from adherents for individualism , informed consent provides an emphatic advantage .
Where efficiency of work , or of power , or of energy , equals the ratio of output units divided by input units , communication of sufficient ideas can be both efficient and effective .
* Which Would Be A Useful Example *
As regards whether aggression is legitimate or illegitimate , each situation may range in uniqueness , or in complexity , as to which actor may have violated non aggression principles and is in fault for having committed violence that presumptively entitles some victim to self defense .

"that presumably entitles some victim to self defense." Thank you for your reply. Actually no presumption needed in self defense.

Circular Statements Implying Ambiguity Off Entitlement *

An adverb may or not be needed ; which would you choose ?

The terms " presumably entitles " were intended to introduce non aggression principles as a theory , while also attempting to state a definition .

The term " presumably " does over imply a degree of uncertainty as to whether one is or is not entitled to self defense and the extent of which one may act in response as self defense ,

Would you be in agreement with " presumptively entitles " includes an adequate adverb in the statement ?

Or , would you be in agreement with " entitles " and not including an adverb in the statement ?


* Stickler Two Thrall *

Is allegiance of members to a creed , for enacting public policy - qualifying as illegitimate aggression , a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to those adherents ?