All Future Admissions to US Service Academies will be based “exclusively on merit”

[Mashmont]

Feminists want combat positions because they dream of being commanding generals in the next war

It pisses them off that men get all the attention

Women in charge of the military. I can see it now. Nuclear war every 28 days.

 

[San Souci]

The fact is that men are better equipped for combat than women are.

Proven Fact.

 

[1srelluc]

No. Sometimes when they work outside, they wear boots.

And a bonnet.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Feminists want combat positions because they dream of being commanding generals in the next war

It pisses them off that men get all the attention

Penis-Envy Piranhas

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Proven Fact.

Learned in Academentia

As Ronald Reagan quoted the Commies in Hollywood, "It works in fact, but does it work in theory?"

 

[jwoodie]

A step in the right direction. And this will benefit our military might when we ferret out all the libs in military admin that are there because of DEI.

I've always thought that if any group of people aren't getting promoted based on merit, than we have a merit issue, not an equity issue.

Does this mean the end of Congressional appointments to the military academies?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

one need look no further than the female helo pilot

Being a woman did not cause her to fly at the wrong altitude.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Does this mean the end of Congressional appointments to the military academies?

No, because the Academies choose who they can select. If the academy says you are not eligible, you don't get in, no matter what.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The fact is that men are better equipped for combat than women are.

Depends on your definition of combat. Women fighter pilots are often better than their male counterparts at high G force turns.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Women in charge of the military. I can see it now. Nuclear war every 28 days.

By the time that happens they are usually post-menopausal.