Alexander Smirnov Has No Online Presence Yet the Feds Claim He’s Peddling Disinformation That Could Impact the 2024 Election

[excalibur]

Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?

This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT.......all peddle misinformation every day

 

[JoeB131]

Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?

This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.

Yet this was the guy you guys called the infallible confidential informant who had proof that Biden got 5 million from Bursima.

So, um, can we stop all this impeachment foolishness now?

 

[MarathonMike]

Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?

This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.

Democrats making a mountain out of a mole hill for the 10,000th time. Or in some cases, as in "Russian Collusion" just completely fabricate the mountain.

 

[JoeB131]

Democrats making a mountain out of a mole hill for the 10,000th time. Or in some cases, as in "Russian Collusion" just completely fabricate the mountain.

Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.

....and, the guy was a Russian Plant the whole time.

 

[excalibur]

Yet this was the guy you guys called the infallible confidential informant who had proof that Biden got 5 million from Bursima.

So, um, can we stop all this impeachment foolishness now?

Incorrect. But keep fantasizing.

 

[Crepitus]

Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?

He tells a republican.

DERf'nP

 

[excalibur]

Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.

....and, the guy was a Russian Plant the whole time.

Errr. It was the FBI who said Smirnov was credible, and had since c.2010 while paying the guy hundreds of thousands of dollars for his info.

That, and you're confusing Smirnov with someone else.

We can clear this up for you.

1) We never knew the informant's name

2) We never talked to the informant

3) The FBI never gave us his name and redacted the FD-1023 because they said he was so important to an ongoing investigation

4) The FBI told the committee, including Democrats, the informant was highly credible​

 

[excalibur]

 

[Hellokitty]

Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.

....and, the guy was a Russian Plant the whole time.

There's a video of Joe's quid pro quo with Bursima...

 

[Natural Citizen]

What's interesting about this is that the vested interests in mainstream media who are promoting this as some sort of get out of jail free card for the Bidens aren't actually questioning it in any way whatsoever.

They're just running with it.

So, yeah. What's that tell you? Ha...

 

[john doe 101]

Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?

This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.

Gym Jordan finds out about it and continues being a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda.
Was this a serious question? The repub s case was built off this propaganda, they passed it down to your ilk, then you spread it.

 

[excalibur]

Gym Jordan finds out about it and continues being a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda.
Was this a serious question? The repub s case was built off this propaganda, they passed it down to your ilk, then you spread it.

Stop posting BS.

Smirnov was the FBI's guy since c.2010. They represented him as reliable to Congress. Though Congress never spoke with him, etc., as posted above in post #8.

 

[john doe 101]

Stop posting BS.

Smirnov was the FBI's guy since c.2010. They represented him as reliable to Congress. Though Congress never spoke with him, etc., as posted above.

They told Gym the info was unverified. Gym blabbed it anyway.

 

[excalibur]

They told Gym the info was unverified. Gym blabbed it anyway.

Nope. The FBI had been paying Smirnov hundreds of thousands of dollars since c.2010.

 

[excalibur]

 

[JoeB131]

Errr. It was the FBI who said Smirnov was credible, and had since c.2010 while paying the guy hundreds of thousands of dollars for his info.

We can clear this up for you.

1) We never knew the informant's name

2) We never talked to the informant

3) The FBI never gave us his name and redacted the FD-1023 because they said he was so important to an ongoing investigation

4) The FBI told the committee, including Democrats, the informant was highly credible

That sounds like some serious backpeddling. If you didn't know the guys names, never talked to him, and saw that most of the FD1023 was redacted, that should have been good enough reason not to go out on a limb.

Especially when the FBI said that they couldn't verify any of the Biden-related information. And especially knowing Russian disinformation campaigns are rampant.

 

[excalibur]

That sounds like some serious backpeddling. If you didn't know the guys names, never talked to him, and saw that most of the FD1023 was redacted, that should have been good enough reason not to go out on a limb.

Especially when the FBI said that they couldn't verify any of the Biden-related information. And especially knowing Russian disinformation campaigns are rampant.

FFS. You're spinning and no one is buying it. The FBI confirmed the guy was reliable and that is why they kept paying him quite handsomely.

 

[excalibur]

 

[JoeB131]

FFS. You're spinning and no one is buying it. The FBI confirmed the guy was reliable and that is why they kept paying him quite handsomely.

Man, I know this is tough for you, but your whole case was built on this guy's lies.

Maybe you guys might have to start offering solutions to problem that don't involve "Tax cuts for rich people".