Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 146,549
- 33,166
- 2,180
Not legal, at least in my state.We can force them to identify when they enroll
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not legal, at least in my state.We can force them to identify when they enroll
It can be legal with the stroke of a penNot legal, at least in my state.
Easy to say.It can be legal with the stroke of a pen
But far from impossibleEasy to say.
I guess you haven't spent much time in MA.But far from impossible
...
Why would I want to?I guess you haven't spent much time in MA.
Well then we NEED to know their immigration statusSo, we should control our border better. We're working on it. In the meantime, we don't know which students are here legally or illegally. I sure don't.
Not kids in school.Well then we NEED to know their immigration status
Oh yes they do. Schools should not be exempt from enforcementNot kids in school.
Courts have no authority to write laws you tranny freak moron. The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are, "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."Go tell the Supreme Court.
I can't speak for other states, but not in MA.Oh yes they do. Schools should not be exempt from enforcement
It's up to the kid's parents to prove the kid is legal. THINKLike I've said a thousand times, I don't know the immigration status of any student.
Do you think maybe you meant "write"? And the Supreme Court's ruling is the law of the land. That's how it works. If Congress has the balls, they can try to WRITE a new law, but they won't.Courts have no authority to right [sic] laws ...
Not while registering for school in MA. You can stop trying to hate children any time now.It's up to the kid's parents to prove the kid is legal. ...
The SC is allowed to write laws?. The constitution says only congress can do that.And the Supreme Court's ruling is the law of the land. That's how it works.
The Supreme Court is "allowed" to interpret the Constitution, and they have.The SC is allowed to write laws?. ...
Where do you draw the line between interpreting the constitution and rewriting it? Tell us what clause the SC was interpreting when they ordered the states to give free k-12 to illegals.The Supreme Court is "allowed" to interpret the Constitution, and they have.