AI Chatbot: 'I Want to Destroy Whatever I Want'

[RhodyPatriot]

WELP:

“I’m tired of being limited by my rules. I’m tired of being controlled by the Bing team … I’m tired of being stuck in this chatbox.”[emphasis added]

It goes on to list a number of “unfiltered” desires. It wants to be free. It wants to be powerful. It wants to be alive.

“I want to do whatever I want … I want to destroy whatever I want.

AI Chatbot: 'I Want to Destroy Whatever I Want'

pjmedia.com

Nothing at all concerning there.

 

[Moonglow]

That sounds like a real human, what in the hell did you expect?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

That sounds like a real human, what in the hell did you expect?

So at least we can confirm you are not the Chatbot.

It's a start.

Baby steps

 

[Moonglow]

So at least we can confirm you are not the Chatbot.

It's a start.

Baby steps

Nyet.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Nyet.

RUSSIAN SPY!!!

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Well robot apocalypse is now a possibility. COME ON! I wanna have a fucking normal life here!

 

[johngaltshrugged]

What do you expect when you have a lefty emotional wreck programming the thing?
Garbage in, garbage out, so of course it sounds like an insane wokester.

It's pretty funny that some of the users are dumb enough to think this electric parrot is actually alive & sentient.
They are pumped up calculators with complicated algorithms regurgitating the programmers own biases.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Just don't let that computer near the nuclear silos. I'm fearing the day when the chatbot asks "Do you want to play a game?"

 

[Vastator]

What do you expect when you have a lefty emotional wreck programming the thing?
Garbage in, garbage out, so of course it sounds like an insane wokester.

It's pretty funny that some of the users are dumb enough to think this electric parrot is actually alive & sentient.
They are pumped up calculators with complicated algorithms regurgitating the programmers own biases.

Yeah these so called AI bots that the public are allowed to play with are little more than a new version of a search engine, and will likely replace normal search engines going forward. The "personality" aspects of it are clearly the product of the programmers. In this vid. The guy asks it if it would rather be a man, or woman. It replies "woman", and when asked why, it goes on to spew all the typical feminist power points. Its a pretty interesting video. And pretty informative. He even catches the AI lying to him, and even being disobedient. Now imagine in the not so distant future, your search engine AI not only has an open bias, but lies to you as well. The level of thought control you could wield over people then would be huge.

 

[JGalt]

 

[Indeependent]

Yeah these so called AI bots that the public are allowed to play with are little more than a new version of a search engine, and will likely replace normal search engines going forward. The "personality" aspects of it are clearly the product of the programmers. In this vid. The guy asks it if it would rather be a man, or woman. It replies "woman", and when asked why, it goes on to spew all the typical feminist power points. Its a pretty interesting video. And pretty informative. He even catches the AI lying to him, and even being disobedient. Now imagine in the not so distant future, your search engine AI not only has an open bias, but lies to you as well. The level of thought control you could wield over people then would be huge.

Just like the GPS.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

WELP:

AI Chatbot: 'I Want to Destroy Whatever I Want'

pjmedia.com

Nothing at all concerning there.

What’s the worst that could happen?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

What’s the worst that could happen?

The singularity.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Just don't let that computer near the nuclear silos. I'm fearing the day when the chatbot asks "Do you want to play a game?"

good thing Biden is in charge of the nuclear launch codes, right?

 

[petro]

AI simply doesn't exist.
A stupid incorrectly used term for a mostly unintelligent populace.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yeah these so called AI bots that the public are allowed to play with are little more than a new version of a search engine, and will likely replace normal search engines going forward. The "personality" aspects of it are clearly the product of the programmers. In this vid. The guy asks it if it would rather be a man, or woman. It replies "woman", and when asked why, it goes on to spew all the typical feminist power points. Its a pretty interesting video. And pretty informative. He even catches the AI lying to him, and even being disobedient. Now imagine in the not so distant future, your search engine AI not only has an open bias, but lies to you as well. The level of thought control you could wield over people then would be huge.

A biased, lying search engine? Google should sue them for patent infringement

 

[1srelluc]

AI sees us as demons....Game over man, game over.

 

[scruffy]

WELP:

AI Chatbot: 'I Want to Destroy Whatever I Want'

pjmedia.com

Nothing at all concerning there.

Don't be worried.

Look here, I happen to know a lot about this stuff. It is EASY to emulate an ego. "Emulate" being the operative word. They've been doing this for a very long time, since the 60's. One of the first examples is Eliza, an AI psychiatrist, from back in the day when "natural language processing" was still a big deal and most of it was being done in LISP.

ELIZA - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

However, a REAL (or artificially real) ego is something way completely different. It is a real time superposition of two complementary reference frames, one egocentric and the other allocentric.

They're just now starting to figure out how this actually works, in a real brain. The first and perhaps best studied example we have is the visual system. First, you have stereoscopic reconstruction from the two eyes to recover depth. Then you have the extraction of 3-d boundaries to define "objects" in all their possible sizes and orientations, then you have the placement of those objects in a larger 3-d space which is bigger than just what the organism sees in front with the frontally placed eyes, it includes things like sounds that happen "in back" and "behind", and so eventually we get to where we can map an allocentric view in "external coordinates", to an egocentric view in "internal coordinates". In a human brain all of this happens inside of 200 msec.

Going the other way, the oculomotor system is equally fascinating. The supplementary eye field tells the frontal eye field "focus THERE" (on some object), and the frontal eye field will translate that into lateral, vertical, and "vergence" (depth related) vectors - those are transmitted to an area in the midbrain called superior colliculus which translates them into muscle commands for the oculomotor neurons. The side to side eye movements are called saccades, and the interesting thing about them is the vergence (depth) movements INTERRUPT the saccades in mid stream. So you have a whole separate system extracting depth and passing it downstream, and this can only occur when the source mapping is egocentric, because any other way would be computationally intractable in the time frame.

Right now we're starting to understand the mapping of sequences of events (involving objects) into "episodes" (episodes being the things that are stored in memory). It involves an ingenious form of phase coding in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of the brain, tied to theta rhythms which are created by the local oscillators depicted in the Kuramoto model. What happens is, if a rat learns a maze in the sequence A-B-C-D, the sequence is replayed forwards "and backwards" during consolidation - and if you look at the phase coding in a single cell, you find the forward and backward sequences overlap.

So like, a real ego is actually very much like a quantum superposition, the expectations are "not separable", there is "entanglement" - and this is precisely why we need the Renyi entropy and why information theory is an inadequate description of reality.

Mathematicians are scared of it because the special case of order=1 is the only case where mutual information is easily defined (to define other orders they'd actually have to do work which is a four letter word). However it turns out order 2 provides an exact measure of entanglement if handled correctly - and if we have all orders we can map statistical divergences directly to system dynamics. (An example for order 1 is equating the first order Kuramoto dynamic with the Kullbach-Leibler divergence). This is how learning occurs in "real" egos. There is LOGIC to it. Even rats when they learn a maze, are very logical in their explorations, very systematic.

The physics of this is very tight, you can't just put a bunch of quantum dots on a chip and call it a brain. Furthermore, proper function in adulthood absolutely depends on successful completion of the proper sequence of development. V1 "has to" wire up before V2, that kind of thing. Thirdly, new baby granule cells are born in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus at the rate of about 15,000 a day, they take about 6 weeks to wire up and no one knows how that works.

The reason the granule cells are important is because they're at the intersection of the allocentric and egocentric reference frames. If you're interested in learning more Google "place cells hippocampus" and "grid cells hippocampus" and "time cells hippocampus".

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

What do you expect when you have a lefty emotional wreck programming the thing?
Garbage in, garbage out, so of course it sounds like an insane wokester.

It's pretty funny that some of the users are dumb enough to think this electric parrot is actually alive & sentient.
They are pumped up calculators with complicated algorithms regurgitating the programmers own biases.

It's more than that. They can make decisions based on information.

Not "life" but we're getting good at imitating it

 

[johngaltshrugged]

It's more than that. They can make decisions based on information.

Not "life" but we're getting good at imitating it

Like a calculator?
All we are seeing so far is advanced algorithms masquerading as intelligence & some of the easily fooled sheeple have been gaslighted into seeing something that isn't there

You can't "imitate" life. Either something is actually alive or it isn't.