Again, what is the Purpose of the Second Amendment

[Grumblenuts]

scholars huh? I want empirical evidence, as in numbers

Yep, as my "Military Times" search result reported

The numbers are hard to argue with.

So of course you just pretend to anyway. That's why I preemptively inquired:

What do you get?

And you supply nothing..
Somehow I really expected more from you.

 

[Grumblenuts]

It's all public records, look it up. Or you could use FOIA..

Look what up? You could simply admit that they were entitled to a hearing, regardless of whether they bothered to show up. Quit arguing with yourself. Makes you look silly.

 

[Auld Phart]

Reuters witnessed Marines detain one person at the Wilshire Federal Building. Reuters images showed Marines restraining his hands with zip ties and then handing him over to civilians from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) nearly two hours later.​

MSN

​

Reuters witnessed Marines detain one person at the Wilshire Federal Building.

which is one of the reasons they are there. guarding FEDERAL BUILDINGS

 

[Auld Phart]

The -neg effect of the 2nd Amendment is that it allows the unsuitable like yourself the Right to Bear Arms.

In your 6 posts, you've said "Black" and "White" nine times. Try to see people instead.

He can't

 

[M14 Shooter]

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
The 2nd Amendment guarantees the ability of the governed to withdraw that consent.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The security of our free state is in jeopardy right now. If this is not the time to consider the Second Amendment, then what is the real purpose of this Amendment?

It is.
And as people protect themselves from the Burn and Loot Mob with deadly force, you will whine and cry and carry on.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The facility for states to arm slave patrols and to put down slave uprisings.

Someone lied to you, and you let them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What did you fail to understand about "protecting federal properties"? You admitted he just detained the guy and handed him over to law enforcement. I there was an arrest, law enforcement did it.

He clearly illustrated his mal-undertstanding of the event.

 

[Auld Phart]

It is.
And as people protect themselves from the Burn and Loot Mob with deadly force, you will whine and cry and carry on.

I remember the Rodney King riots, and how some sections were basically left alone because the people in the neighborhood made it clear they were NOT to be fucked with.

Legendary "Rooftop Korean" lights up the replies as Los Angeles burns 👀

ROOFTOP KOREANS ACTIVATED.

notthebee.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

I remember the Rodney King riots, and how some sections were basically left alone because the people in the neighborhood made it clear they were NOT to be fucked with.

Legendary "Rooftop Korean" lights up the replies as Los Angeles burns 👀

ROOFTOP KOREANS ACTIVATED.

notthebee.com

This is the primary reason for CA's expansion of its 'assault weapon' ban.

 

[Auld Phart]

This is the primary reason for CA's expansion of its 'assault weapon' ban.

yes, how DARE the citizens protect themselves.

 

[M14 Shooter]

yes, how DARE the citizens protect themselves.

The entire purpose of gun control is to make it harder for the law abiding to protect themselves.

 

[OKTexas]

Did they detain him illegally? Did they enforce law?

No they prevented possible harm to federal property and handed the individual over to law enforcement. It's really no different if you detain someone that broke into your property and held them for the police. Would you be enforcing the law or just helping law enforcement?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Look what up? You could simply admit that they were entitled to a hearing, regardless of whether they bothered to show up. Quit arguing with yourself. Makes you look silly.

If they didn't show up and a final order of removal was issued, they aren't entitled to shit. Well except a trip out of the country, they've had their due process.

.

 

[Grumblenuts]

If they didn't show up

for that hearing they were entitled to?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

MORE THAN EVER, conservatives need our rights to own firearms.
My advice to all conservatives, is to continue to stock up on ammo.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Supreme Court previously affirmed its purpose:

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms —unconnected with service in a militia— for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[OKTexas]

for that hearing they were entitled to?

It's a violation of the rules to alter text within the quote box if it alters context, you have done that to me twice now. I'll delete your post if I see you doing it again to me or anyone else. Also the question has already been answered, now you're just trolling.

.

 

[dudmuck]

lies, maga as you call them are just normal citizens, they are not gang bangers or thugs. Just look at the stats who's more violent, it's the far left loonies
do you have any hard stats to back up your claim at all? I doubt it.......it's just your false opinion

something just happened in Minnesota.

 

[Grumblenuts]

It's a violation of the rules to alter text within the quote box if it alters context, you have done that to me twice now. I'll delete your post if I see you doing it again to me or anyone else. Also the question has already been answered, now you're just trolling.

.

Lovely. Thanks so much.