Adam Schiff's diabolical grin broke from his poker face to reveal his RESIST hand.

HaShev

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2009
17,519
6,906
335
Ranking House Intelligence Committee member Democrat Adam Schiff called Sunday for a
review of Kushner's
White House security clearance even though he is supposed to be non partisan & subject innocent till proven guilty, in which case Schiff also knows there was no crime committed
for him to make such partisan politicaly motivated obstructive statements. He has to know there was no crime committed for him to even bring up the WH clearance otherwise he's not qualified or capable of being on the committee in the first place where by the way they keep forcing Rep members off by recusal to change the narrative of the investigation=obstruction.

HERE IS WHY HE KNOWS no crime occured.
1) Schiff knows It was not Kushner who asked for the
back channel, it was the Russians, the fake news narrative is exposed by saying Jared requested it and even falsely claims he did so at Trumps request. As the truth comes out Schiff knows with no back channel being set up (only discussed)& Russians brought it up then no crime occured or even notion of impropriety.
(Besides the fact Back Channels are Normal and legal procedure and necessary)
This is why it was never brought up until Kushner became a threat to Dems that made him the timely target after the sucess of his hand in the SUCESSFUL Trump Middle East Tour. If Kushner had done something wrong they would have pounced on this when Flynn was pounced on, instead nothing was here to be concerned with until later Dems needed another risong star staff member taken out, in which case the narrative got rewritten and false accusations flew out MSM and now we see
Schiff is willingly going against duties to help ablige the coup.
In this case it's obvious Schiff needs to recuse himself of the Russia investigation, he is clearly exposing himself as partisan and part of the criminal activity that created the whole Russia narrative in the first place. The systematic taking out of your opponent parties staff cabinet is an abuse of power and if Nunez was required to Recuse himself for similar claims of partisan acts then so to does Schiff need to be requested to recuse himself.

2) I was right all along in that
the KUSHNER fervor was fake news, not just because it was the Russian who merely asked for it in passing conversation, but also I was right that they wanted to do this to talk about Syria which is exactly what I said would make a back channel necessary.
How can I with no experience in intelligence investigations be more comprehending of the situation and diplomatic procedure then the one representing the investigation?
If Schiff knows it's all about Syria and is a common procedure to open back channels & it wasn't Jared's request then how can he seriously call for Jared's
security clearance to be revoked?
If it was just about claiming he didn't list the discussion there might be a reason or subjective discrepancy in the trick questions but either way if that is what SCHIFF believes requires consideration then why add the false narrative and partisan politics spin to the equation to miss inform and bring false illusions? This only shows he is oart of the game not trying to investigate or stop it thus needs to recuse himself.
Doing it with that smug grin just showed his intent and should have quickly gotten him pulled from his roll and posution on the intelligence committee. Since he lied about it being partisan we might have to place him in the investigation of abuses of power and even possible leaker under the espionage act and bring up criminal charges if it's found he is part of this fake charges ruse and series of fake narrative leaks.
 
Last edited:
I don't care if he dressed in drag, I do care however that the committee he's on is investigating the collusion farce, but you
can't collude with Russians after you won the election, Kushners discussion Schiff is stammering over wasn't until Dec. after the election. MsM Doesn't give us that fact of time frame reference because it takes out their collusion narrative that they are planting in people's minds and lessens
the back channel suspicion.
If Kushners discussion has nothing to do with the Collusion case Schiff really exposed himself outside his reach and even more so is REQUIRED to recuse himself.
 
Last edited:
Ranking House Intelligence Committee member Democrat Adam Schiff called Sunday for a
review of Kushner's
White House security clearance even though he is supposed to be non partisan & subject innocent till proven guilty, in which case Schiff also knows there was no crime committed
for him to make such partisan politicaly motivated obstructive statements. He has to know there was no crime committed for him to even bring up the WH clearance otherwise he's not qualified or capable of being on the committee in the first place where by the way they keep forcing Rep members off by recusal to change the narrative of the investigation=obstruction.

HERE IS WHY HE KNOWS no crime occured.
1) Schiff knows It was not Kushner who asked for the
back channel, it was the Russians, the fake news narrative is exposed by saying Jared requested it and even falsely claims he did so at Trumps request. As the truth comes out Schiff knows with no back channel being set up (only discussed)& Russians brought it up then no crime occured or even notion of impropriety.
(Besides the fact Back Channels are Normal and legal procedure and necessary)
This is why it was never brought up until Kushner became a threat to Dems that made him the timely target after the sucess of his hand in the SUCESSFUL Trump Middle East Tour. If Kushner had done something wrong they would have pounced on this when Flynn was pounced on, instead nothing was here to be concerned with until later Dems needed another risong star staff member taken out, in which case the narrative got rewritten and false accusations flew out MSM and now we see
Schiff is willingly going against duties to help ablige the coup.
In this case it's obvious Schiff needs to recuse himself of the Russia investigation, he is clearly exposing himself as partisan and part of the criminal activity that created the whole Russia narrative in the first place. The systematic taking out of your opponent parties staff cabinet is an abuse of power and if Nunez was required to Recuse himself for similar claims of partisan acts then so to does Schiff need to be requested to recuse himself.

2) I was right all along in that
the KUSHNER fervor was fake news, not just because it was the Russian who merely asked for it in passing conversation, but also I was right that they wanted to do this to talk about Syria which is exactly what I said would make a back channel necessary.
How can I with no experience in intelligence investigations be more comprehending of the situation and diplomatic procedure then the one representing the investigation?
If Schiff knows it's all about Syria and is a common procedure to open back channels & it wasn't Jared's request then how can he seriously call for Jared's
security clearance to be revoked?
If it was just about claiming he didn't list the discussion there might be a reason or subjective discrepancy in the trick questions but either way if that is what SCHIFF believes requires consideration then why add the false narrative and partisan politics spin to the equation to miss inform and bring false illusions? This only shows he is oart of the game not trying to investigate or stop it thus needs to recuse himself.
Doing it with that smug grin just showed his intent and should have quickly gotten him pulled from his roll and posution on the intelligence committee. Since he lied about it being partisan we might have to place him in the investigation of abuses of power and even possible leaker under the espionage act and bring up criminal charges if it's found he is part of this fake charges ruse and series of fake narrative leaks.
"non partisan & subject innocent till proven guilty,"??????????????????????????

What is the matter with you?

When were Washington politicians non partisan? and dedicated to the concept of innocence?
 
That's the point, when in these committees they are entrusted to be about justice not party and they forced Nunez to recuse himself for lesser reasons and here we have Schiff exposing his hand and now has to eat his own words and standards he set upon Nunez.
 
What, pay Schiff off in Pezz dispensers?
The guy acts like a child.
 

Forum List

Back
Top