Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
See what I mean, loser????
"If you are a common [Democrat/Liberal] voter, you do not have the capacity to think."
Seems you and I are of one mind on this premise.
Have you noticed how the Leftists in the thread have verified same?
It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.
I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.
the donkey is only temporarily pixilated
1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.
2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.
This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’
" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.
It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review
It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.
You buyin’ that?
You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.
The 2018 and 2020 elections will be decisive. The CNN and MSNBC talking heads will be sitting there and whining again, some whining about "white lash", even though it will be black voters choosing not to be taken for granted by democrats any longer, as well as "deplorables", i.e. "racists, misogynists, and stupid Trump sycophants". If the economy keep plowing along thru 2020, the dems can plan to raise taxes, open borders, eliminate ICE, and implement socialism, but voters will make the smart choice...
How about the 2016 election as being decisive?
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
Talk about a 'smart choice.'
True! The dems still haven't figured out that the union guys like Trump and hate Hillary. At football games many told me that Trump was going to win even though the polls said otherwise. The only item against a "decisive" Trump win in 2016 are all of the "never Trump republicans?!" Imagine if the slimy never Trumpers all got on board with the Trump agenda (actually keeping campaign promises!!). Imagine if the MSM actually reported fairly instead of 93% negatively. Its going to be a fun couple of years!!
It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.
I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.
the donkey is only temporarily pixilated
1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.
2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.
This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’
" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.
It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review
It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.
You buyin’ that?
You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.
View attachment 206966How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.
I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.
1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.
2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.
This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’
" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.
It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review
It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.
You buyin’ that?
You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.
Like a bunch of marching penguins
I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....
Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:
Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,
against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...
...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.
"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.
They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism
And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.
These:
a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???
b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?
c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?
These questions still too tough????
How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????
Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????
I am forced?! What a hack. Read the poster and learn what you are doing. I vote for the most qualified candidate, not the best liar. Too bad you can't make that statement.
See what I mean, loser????
How many of the OP's nearly 74,000 posts didn't include some kind of insult? I've never seen such an obvious narcissist before. You should know that being distasteful to the point that people don't want to talk to you and winning an argument are not the same thing. You're not a good debater, but you may be the most tiresome and obnoxious person that uses these forums.
"If you are a common [Democrat/Liberal] voter, you do not have the capacity to think."
Seems you and I are of one mind on this premise.
Have you noticed how the Leftists in the thread have verified same?
I was a leftist in my late teens, until I started working for a living after ditching school. Once I started questioning why %25 of my check was gone before it was signed and where that money went, thus began my rejection of leftist dogma.
I noticed that during the transition, my new perspective was not welcome in the same social circles. (Drum circles and echo chambers). It simply wasn't tolerated when you openly questioned just how much government was allowed to take from you, especially by people who didn't work at all and subsisted off welfare and government hand outs. Old hippie types rejected authority for the most part, but people my age seemed to have no problem with authority to confiscate other people's shit.
So it's not just moonbats on this board. It was people I knew that proved to me independent thinking wasn't exalted, it was to be shunned.
.
There is so little independent thinking in this country right now, the main tribes are so set in their ways, that this whole notion is absurd in the extreme.
The deliciously ironic feature of this thread is that The Queen of Copiously Cutting & Pasting Other People's Words is convinced she thinks for herself.I see your problem...you misinterpret 'independent thinking' as saying both sides are the same. You dunce.There is so little independent thinking in this country right now, the main tribes are so set in their ways, that this whole notion is absurd in the extreme.
The deliciously ironic feature of this thread is that The Queen of Cutting & Pasting Other People's Words is convinced she thinks for herself.I see your problem...you misinterpret 'independent thinking' as saying both sides are the same. You dunce.There is so little independent thinking in this country right now, the main tribes are so set in their ways, that this whole notion is absurd in the extreme.
Again - Your "Sean Hannity with Tits" routine is cute, kind of, but I'm under zero (0) obligation to take it, or you, seriously.
.
Yes, congrats, Sean. Or Shauna.The deliciously ironic feature of this thread is that The Queen of Cutting & Pasting Other People's Words is convinced she thinks for herself.I see your problem...you misinterpret 'independent thinking' as saying both sides are the same. You dunce.There is so little independent thinking in this country right now, the main tribes are so set in their ways, that this whole notion is absurd in the extreme.
Again - Your "Sean Hannity with Tits" routine is cute, kind of, but I'm under zero (0) obligation to take it, or you, seriously.
.
The fact that I am able to document all of my perfectly constructed theses, seems to irk you.
Excellent.
It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.
I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.
the donkey is only temporarily pixilated
1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.
Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.
2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.
This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’
" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.
It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review
It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.
You buyin’ that?
You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.
Your quotes and mine seem to have been incorrectly intertwined.
Stop spamming your own thread, you are embarrassing yourself
Are these policies of the party you vote for????
Let's see you defend the policies of your Democrat Party:
a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????
c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?
d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???
e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?
f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?
Stop spamming your own thread, you are embarrassing yourself
Are these policies of the party you vote for????
Let's see you defend the policies of your Democrat Party:
a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????
c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?
d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???
e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?
f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?
You ran from that conversation because you couldn’t back up your bullshit. You honestly expect anybody to believe that Obama guaranteed nukes to Iran. Are you high?Stop spamming your own thread, you are embarrassing yourself
Are these policies of the party you vote for????
Let's see you defend the policies of your Democrat Party:
a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????
c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?
d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???
e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?
f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?
As you've been exposed as a liar.....why would I want anything to do with you?
Please don't return.
