Actually Allowed To Think!

[Pete7469]

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

If you are a common libturd voter, you do not have the capacity to think. You're a drone. A complete pin headed parasite that belongs in a mental hospital or back in the grave where they have been since some useless democrook activist registered them to vote. Between that sort and the political whores they're mostly sociopaths that belong in prison because their objective is to get richer through government, rather than by accomplishing anything for the benefit of the tax payers. In many cases they're still loyal to an international global collectivist government and make deliberate efforts to undermine our society and sovereignty. They used to be agents of the KGB even if some of them didn't know it.

Once Russia dumped marxism and even china reformed the fuck out of themselves, and communism only exists in 4 or 5 countries, poorly. The commies around the world and those that infested the US didn't give up on that bullshit, they're convinced WE need to be taken down first, and then communism will work. That's the objective of the left. Take us down and carry global communism on the back of the richest nations, making the whole world a fucking shit hole.

With them well into the spoils of bureaucracy of course.

 

[Slade3200]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

 

[Mac1958]

"Your tribe doesn't think for itself, but MY tribe does".

You've gotta be kidding me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

If you are a common libturd voter, you do not have the capacity to think. You're a drone. A complete pin headed parasite that belongs in a mental hospital or back in the grave where they have been since some useless democrook activist registered them to vote. Between that sort and the political whores they're mostly sociopaths that belong in prison because their objective is to get richer through government, rather than by accomplishing anything for the benefit of the tax payers. In many cases they're still loyal to an international global collectivist government and make deliberate efforts to undermine our society and sovereignty. They used to be agents of the KGB even if some of them didn't know it.

Once Russia dumped marxism and even china reformed the fuck out of themselves, and communism only exists in 4 or 5 countries, poorly. The commies around the world and those that infested the US didn't give up on that bullshit, they're convinced WE need to be taken down first, and then communism will work. That's the objective of the left. Take us down and carry global communism on the back of the richest nations, making the whole world a fucking shit hole.

With them well into the spoils of bureaucracy of course.

"If you are a common [Democrat/Liberal] voter, you do not have the capacity to think."


Seems you and I are of one mind on this premise.


Have you noticed how the Leftists in the thread have verified same?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

 

[Slade3200]

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Your tribe doesn't think for itself, but MY tribe does".

You've gotta be kidding me.

Fence sitter checking in???

You'd like a chance??

No prob!


Soooo....which of these Democrat policies would you care to defend/explain.

Or, as you can never see one side as better than the other (coward)....which polices of the Right are adherents unable to explain or define???



a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

 

[Slade3200]

"Your tribe doesn't think for itself, but MY tribe does".

You've gotta be kidding me.

Fence sitter checking in???

You'd like a chance??

No prob!


Soooo....which of these Democrat policies would you care to defend/explain.

Or, as you can never see one side as better than the other (coward)....which polices of the Right are adherents unable to explain or define???



a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????

Nobody reads your copy and paste shit. Pick ONE point and make it well. You are just wasting space with all your garble

 

[Slade3200]

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

I’m happy to address your points. Are you planning on addressing mine?

 

[Slade3200]

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Your tribe doesn't think for itself, but MY tribe does".

You've gotta be kidding me.

Fence sitter checking in???

You'd like a chance??

No prob!


Soooo....which of these Democrat policies would you care to defend/explain.

Or, as you can never see one side as better than the other (coward)....which polices of the Right are adherents unable to explain or define???



a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????

Nobody reads your copy and paste shit. Pick ONE point and make it well. You are just wasting space with all your garble

Now....be sure to get right back to me ....without the vulgarity....as soon as you can make a cogent argument in favor of these Democrat policies:


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

 

[PoliticalChic]

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

First lie....Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran.



Next?

 

[Slade3200]

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

First lie....Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran.



Next?

Prove it

 

[Slade3200]

I’m not a democrat voter and you can’t seem to address my statement without reflecting back to the Dems and then flooding the conversation with your copy and paste madness. Keep your arguments simple and direct and you will get better engagement. The points you try to make now just get drowned out through too much blabber. I’m not going to read 10 paragraphs with a dozen different topics and multiple questions. One at a time politichick

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

First lie....Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran.



Next?

Easy and quick question. Do you respect the judgement of General Mattis?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...without reflecting back to the Dems ..."


You haven't noticed that this is the premise of the thread????


What sort of moron are you????

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

First lie....Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran.



Next?

Prove it

What are you....an imbecile????



1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."

Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)



Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....


Get lost.

 

[Slade3200]

You are focusing on Dems and Liberals.... I get it, you get off by fueling the partisan divide. But I made a point that it is happening on the Right as well and then i cited examples. You ignore all that and then pivot back to the Dems. You are either ignorant or a hypocrite... or I’m wrong and you should prove me wrong by addressing my argument

Soooo....you can't handle any of those?


Excellent.

Here I’ll start with your first statement.

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

This is an easy one. We didn’t award nukes to anybody. Not sure what you’re even talking about here

First lie....Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran.



Next?

Prove it

What are you....an imbecile????



1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."

Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)



Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....


Get lost.

Yeah, nothing that you wrote proves that Obama guaranteed nukes to Iran. That’s an outright lie and we all know it.

You keep avoiding my questions, why is that?
Do you respect General Mattis?

 

[Tax Man]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

I am forced?! What a hack. Read the poster and learn what you are doing. I vote for the most qualified candidate, not the best liar. Too bad you can't make that statement.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

View attachment 206966
I am forced?! What a hack. Read the poster and learn what you are doing. I vote for the most qualified candidate, not the best liar. Too bad you can't make that statement.

Wanna see me force you to prove that Democrats aren't able to think?

Sure.


Let's see you defend the policies of your Democrat Party:


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?



See what I mean, loser????

 

[Slade3200]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

View attachment 206966
I am forced?! What a hack. Read the poster and learn what you are doing. I vote for the most qualified candidate, not the best liar. Too bad you can't make that statement.

Wanna see me force you to prove that Democrats aren't able to think?

Sure.


Let's see you defend the policies of your Democrat Party:


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?



See what I mean, loser????

You really gotta stop copy and pasting the same shit over and over. First off, your list is full of lies. You ran away from our convo when I was proving it. And also why won’t you address my original statement about the puppet trumpbots?