Actually Allowed To Think!

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

 

[night_son]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

Yes, it is the manifestation of elitist philosophy translated to socio-political reality--a sort of thinking away the advent of Modernism, the Industrial Revolution and capitalism. On the coin's flipside it is a surrender of individual freedom and identity for State and Party guaranteed nourishment and protection; the mass social manufacture of the faceless working class.

 

[PoliticalChic]

3. Does this recent series of prognostications by ‘experts’ give you Liberals pause?


“Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers predicted that if Donald Trump were elected, there would be a protracted recession within 18 months.


Heeding its experts, a month before the election, The Washington Post ran an editorial with the headline "A President Trump Could Destroy The World Economy."


Steve Rattner, a Democratic financier and former head of the National Economic Council, warned, "If the unlikely event happens and Trump wins, you will see a market crash of historic proportions."


When Trump's electoral victory became apparent, Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman warned that the world was "very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight."
Walter Williams: Can We Trust Experts?



All expert predictions from the Left, the Democrats.

All wrong.

All continue to guide the Left.



But, heck, you reliable Democrat voters can only march, not think.

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. " ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.”




Would you have made the same decisions as these Democrat experts, bureaucrats, elites, and …..



a .have wasted $22 trillion in what is a failed welfare system, as nearly the same number of Americans are in poverty as were a half century ago, when they started?

b. have awarded nuclear weapons to the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism?

c. seen the lack of results of their gun control laws in effect in Chicago, yet demand that those laws be made national in scope?

d. Would you have seen the result of substituting ‘social justice’ for fiscal responsibility, the mortgage meltdown, which resulted in ... the total lost household wealth of $19.2 trillion….yet continue to insist on flawed banking mandates?

e. Would you continue to demand illegal immigration, which causes increased unemployment, cost vast sums in welfare benefits, weigh down the justice system, and decreases the standard of living for real Americans....and decrease the security of our nation?






Or, would you demand the right to draw your own conclusions about policies that secure the nation….as we on the Right do?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It’s a legitimate question, whether reliable Democrat voters are abysmally lazy, or congenitally stupid to put their trust in decision they don’t understand….or don’t support.


5. “People whom we've trusted as experts have often been wrong beyond imagination, and it's nothing new. Irving Fisher, a distinguished Yale University economics professor in 1929, predicted, "Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." Three days later, the stock market crashed.


In 1945, regarding money spent on the Manhattan Project, Adm. William Leahy told President Harry S. Truman, "That is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The (atomic) bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives."
Walter Williams: Can We Trust Experts?







6. And speaking of experts, bet I’m not the only one who remember one of our ersatz dunces, who also claimed “and I speak as an expert in explosives."


That dunce rushed to defend clock-boy, and made bogus claims....like this:

"I'm retired military and an electronics expert. I know what bombs look like, and I know what clocks look like."
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


And this:

"I am also an electronics expert. I worked at the top of the field for decades.... All these FACTS destroy your stupid FANTASY it looks like a bomb. Even an English teacher could tell it wasn't."
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum




…a few pictures "blew up" his expertise....

If they thought Ahmed brought a ‘bomb’, why didn’t they evacuate the school?





"I'm retired military and an electronics expert. I know what bombs look like, and I know what clocks look like."



I get such a kick out of this.





Recognize who our bomb, military, and electronics 'expert' is?

 

[Confounding]

if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

Trump won with less votes than Romney lost with. Hillary lost the election because of thinking left wingers that refused to vote for a lying, flip flopping corporatist warmonger.

 

[kyzr]

The 2018 and 2020 elections will be decisive. The CNN and MSNBC talking heads will be sitting there and whining again, some whining about "white lash", even though it will be black voters choosing not to be taken for granted by democrats any longer, as well as "deplorables", i.e. "racists, misogynists, and stupid Trump sycophants". If the economy keep plowing along thru 2020, the dems can plan to raise taxes, open borders, eliminate ICE, and implement socialism, but voters will make the smart choice...

 

[PoliticalChic]

The 2018 and 2020 elections will be decisive. The CNN and MSNBC talking heads will be sitting there and whining again, some whining about "white lash", even though it will be black voters choosing not to be taken for granted by democrats any longer, as well as "deplorables", i.e. "racists, misogynists, and stupid Trump sycophants". If the economy keep plowing along thru 2020, the dems can plan to raise taxes, open borders, eliminate ICE, and implement socialism, but voters will make the smart choice...

How about the 2016 election as being decisive?

October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?



Talk about a 'smart choice.'

 

[kyzr]

The 2018 and 2020 elections will be decisive. The CNN and MSNBC talking heads will be sitting there and whining again, some whining about "white lash", even though it will be black voters choosing not to be taken for granted by democrats any longer, as well as "deplorables", i.e. "racists, misogynists, and stupid Trump sycophants". If the economy keep plowing along thru 2020, the dems can plan to raise taxes, open borders, eliminate ICE, and implement socialism, but voters will make the smart choice...

How about the 2016 election as being decisive?

October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?



Talk about a 'smart choice.'

True! The dems still haven't figured out that the union guys like Trump and hate Hillary. At football games many told me that Trump was going to win even though the polls said otherwise. The only item against a "decisive" Trump win in 2016 are all of the "never Trump republicans?!" Imagine if the slimy never Trumpers all got on board with the Trump agenda (actually keeping campaign promises!!). Imagine if the MSM actually reported fairly instead of 93% negatively. Its going to be a fun couple of years!!

 

[Tax Man]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

Is this what you really want to say?

 

[Mac1958]

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

Is this what you really want to say?

View attachment 206918

I always say what I want to say.

As you are a prime example of those who have given up the ability to think, a reliable Democrat voter, see it you can conceptualize this:


Democrats anoint their candidates.....like calling Hussein god, or the messiah, or Jesus......all of which they did.


Thinking folks, we on the Right, vote for policies, not personalities.

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



Get it, you dunce?

 

[Tax Man]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

Is this what you really want to say?

View attachment 206918

I always say what I want to say.

As you are a prime example of those who have given up the ability to think, a reliable Democrat voter, see it you can conceptualize this:


Democrats anoint their candidates.....like calling Hussein god, or the messiah, or Jesus......all of which they did.

Sorry but your lack of memory prohibits you from telling the truth. It was the republican propaganda machine and tRump who put out those memes.

Thinking folks, we on the Wrong, vote for policies, not personalities.

The riech as my image suggests only repeat what the master says.

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



Get it, you dunce?

I do not believe your dunceship will ever get it. But then that is why you are a shill.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. And now, if I may borrow from Edmond Rostand....
“...as I end the refrain, thrust home!"



Simple enough to prove that our board Democrats, Liberals, and Progressives have been trained not to think……one need only ask them to defend or explain the ideas that their party stands for, and listen for “….duh…..”


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?







These are pillars on which the Democrat agenda rests….yet their supporters…who are not allowed to think….cannot defend or even explain the reasons for these Democrat doctrines.




That’s right: Democrat voters are forbidden to think. They personify this Alfred Lord Tennyson Quote: Ours not to reason why, ours but to do and die.

 

[Tax Man]

7. And now, if I may borrow from Edmond Rostand....
“...as I end the refrain, thrust home!"



Simple enough to prove that our board Democrats, Liberals, and Progressives have been trained not to think……one need only ask them to defend or explain the ideas that their party stands for, and listen for “….duh…..”


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?







These are pillars on which the Democrat agenda rests….yet their supporters…who are not allowed to think….cannot defend or even explain the reasons for these Democrat doctrines.




That’s right: Democrat voters are forbidden to think. They personify this Alfred Lord Tennyson Quote: Ours not to reason why, ours but to do and die.

The supposed doctrines are conservative talking points! DUH! More of the flinging of nitrogenous waste by the queen.

 

[Slade3200]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. And now, if I may borrow from Edmond Rostand....
“...as I end the refrain, thrust home!"



Simple enough to prove that our board Democrats, Liberals, and Progressives have been trained not to think……one need only ask them to defend or explain the ideas that their party stands for, and listen for “….duh…..”


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?







These are pillars on which the Democrat agenda rests….yet their supporters…who are not allowed to think….cannot defend or even explain the reasons for these Democrat doctrines.




That’s right: Democrat voters are forbidden to think. They personify this Alfred Lord Tennyson Quote: Ours not to reason why, ours but to do and die.

The supposed doctrines are conservative talking points! DUH! More of the flinging of nitrogenous waste by the queen.

Are you claiming that these are not doctrines that the Democrat Party advances, stands for???


a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


Your claim is that Obama and Johnson are/were not Democrats????





I love forcing you dopes into such obvious lies, ExLaxMan.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

 

[Slade3200]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, many of which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is eminently provable: only the Right is actually allowed to think.
The other side must march, lock-step, they must leave ‘thinking’ to their experts, elites and bureaucrats.

I can prove this, with both historical and contemporary references.




1.Lets go back to early 19th century. Tocqueville pointed out that one side promises care from cradle to grave, as long as you do exactly as ordered.

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”


Certainly an enticing deal…if one is ready to give up one’s God-given intellect.





2. During the 19th century, progressivism was born in academia, which posited that there is a sort of individual of a higher level, who would guide the great unwashed.

This is the idea of the ‘administrative state.’


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review





It is the doctrine of the administrative state, one run by unelected experts, bureaucrats, technocrats who know what is best for everyone else. These ‘special’ individuals would never make choices designed for their own aggrandizement.

You buyin’ that?


You are if you’re a Progressive, a Liberal, a Democrat: thinking for yourself is out of the question.

How can you say the Trumpbots are thinking when they have flipped on so many issues? Tariffs, Russia, National Debt/Spending, family values/morality....

Like a bunch of marching penguins

I'm saying that America voted for Trump due to the police he advanced, and that we Americans can explain and defend his policies....

Here's a dozen reasons why Trump was elected by real Americans:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,
against $20 trillion national debt...

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism



And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???

b. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


c. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????





Isn't it neat how I force you to prove my point????

What’s up with the verbal diaheria? Can’t you just make a concise point?

Trump was elected for a variety of reasons, manybif which you listed. Clinton was not a strong opponent, some people are single issue voters and other always vote for their party. But you didn’t address my statement....

You say the Right is only allowed to think yet you have a huge movement behind Trump supporting many things that they used to be against. That’s not thinking it is following.

And I'm proving....PROVING...that Democrat voters....you.....can't explain or defend Democrat policies.

These:

a. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



b. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????



c. Since the inception of LBJ's 'War on Poverty,' $22 trillion has been spent to end poverty…yet the poverty rate is worryingly similar to the rate when LBJ began….why are we still following this failed plan?


d.Why would the President, Hussein Obama, sworn to defend the Constitution, have instructed illegal aliens to vote in the presidential election???


e. The three factors that are working to injure the middle class, the working folks, are globalization, immigration, and technology.
If the Democrat Party is concerned about the middle class, why is the Democrat Party foursquare in favor of all three?


f. While I recognize that Democrat officials are copacetic with legalizing marijuana, is that why they are silent about Hussein Obama giving Hezbollah free rein in bringing $ billion in cocaine a year into our country to placate Iran?

These questions still too tough????


How about this one: why are you still voting for that party?????




"Think" you can explain those Democrat positions???????

Or....just admit you're not permitted to question your masters.