Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They were rehearsing not filming.Unless it was a front on shot that was being filmed.
www.kob.com
And you don't think the cinematographer and director are looking through a lens for the shot sequences? You've never been on a set have you?They were rehearsing not filming.
Tragedy on set: 911 calls from film crew detail chaos following prop gun shooting
"We were rehearsing and it went off and I ran out, we all ran out."
Okay.I know blanks and I know bullets.
The full facts aren't known at this time, and may never be, so this is conjecture.The report said that a bullet passed through the chick and hit the guy.
Production crew walked off Baldwin movie set before tragic shooting
The workers had been complaining about the fact they had to stay overnight in Albuquerque - an hour's drive from the set - and not Sante Fe because production wouldn't pay for their hotels.www.dailymail.co.uk
The warrant also said that a single bullet struck Hutchins in the chest, and then struck director Joel Souza in the shoulder as he was standing behind her, injuring him, suggesting the bullet traveled all the way through Hutchins' body.
by deflecting your defending your one of your plantation oversees killer baldwinI am not defending anyone, if he murdered a woman he should go to prison or get the needle.
a dembot cult leader could shot someone in the middle of new mexico and dembot cultist would still blame trumpThat is a bullshit response! Get your head out of Trump's ass!!! Bigly!!!
Of course. Elites should be able to accidentally kill whomever they want, whenever they want, even when someone that doesn't identify as a "conservative" points out the absurdity of it all.This is why conservatives have no idea about justice. Not an inkling.
Kind of a silly tack you're taking, there. The same arguments could be made (as Dr Grump is making), if it was a stuntman holding the gun.Of course. Elites should be able to accidentally kill whomever they want, whenever they want, even when someone that doesn't identify as a "conservative" points out the absurdity of it all.
I'm not suggesting anything other than the facts.So you are suggesting he deliberately murdered his main cinematographer?
That is going to set the movie back months, or even end it entirely.
Why would anyone do that, with witnesses?
Because liberals can be pro-gun, fruit loop. Or maybe they're just being hypocrites. A little critical thought can't hurt.Why do liberals make movies that involve guns? If you're anti-guns you shouldn't be making money off guns in any way.
true baldwin has a history of unhinged violent rants..even going after his own daughterA violent dumbass.
Hey, whatever you need to tell yourself to defend your hero and deny the facts.Kind of a silly tack you're taking, there. The same arguments could be made (as Dr Grump is making), if it was a stuntman holding the gun.
The thought that Baldwin was set up by a rabid alt-righty gun nut had crossed my mind.Big Labor operatives ordered their members off the set shortly before the supposed "accident".
Maybe it was a setup, a way to create a situation where the union could raise awareness of a lack of safety on the set?
I haven't defended anyone. Don't be such a drama queen.Hey, whatever you need to tell yourself to defend your hero and deny the facts.
The very first rule of "safe gun handling" my Dad taught me was to check the weapong to see if it was loaded. I tell the two year old I am around to never point his "Nerf Gun at people. Kids CAN be taught but a responsible adult has to teach them Alec Baldwin is guilty of NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE IMHO. But He will never be charged.Some are modified to fire blanks, especially automatics that may need the gasses supressed to cycle eject and load at lower gas pressure or recoil strength, but all are still dangerous. They have killed actors from time to time. First I remember was Pete Duel, starring on the set of Alias Smith and Jones, all the way back in 1971, clowning around pointing his prop .46 six-shooter at his own head and the blank killed him.
Telling me that a person should be held accountable for killing another person is a "silly tack," is cognitive denial of the empirical facts of the case.I haven't defended anyone. Don't be such a drama queen.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
There is no meaningful distinction.I'm not judge and jury, but that was not a prop gun, that was a real gun.
Please see above.They should stop calling it a prop gun because that's misleading.
There is no meaningful distinction.
If it is fashioned like a gun & fires projectiles, it's a gun.
And if something is being used as a prop, it is a prop.
This includes guns of many types.
Please see above.
No; you're not understanding.Ok look....so we can all have prop guns from now on? and kill people?
we kill people but we only kill with a prop gun....so we didn't kill really?
is only a prop gun so if we killed you doesn't count.
is that what you are saying?
wow!
