Active US Marine Lt Col Speaks Out Against Afghanistan Debacle

He is a great Patriot. God bless him.

The leadership of this country is really fucked up now.

The top military leaders are the ones that survived the Obama senior leadership purges and are weak stupid yes men. This officer is correct in his analysis.
 
occupied
Vietnam was unwinnable --links-proof here
 
Presidents pretty much just say GO. They damned sure can't foretell the future. They turn to the experts at hand to make an informed judgement. Someone was obviously very wrong. The only military careers at stake here should be the top brass who were told to organize a withdrawal and fumbled the ball.
Wrong. Biden ordered the withdrawal based upon an arbitrary date despite all facts pointing to failure and proceeded to ignore the Taliban was violating the withdrawal agreement just so he could meet his arbitrary date.
This is 100% on Biden.
 
occupied
Vietnam was unwinnable --links-proof here
Vietnam was very winnable.
 
wrong--you just fkd up--like I've said --you DON'T know shit
Korea win -
,''''' the U.N. Security Council met in an emergency session and approved a U.S. resolution calling for an “immediate cessation of hostilities” and the withdrawal of North Korean forces to the 38th parallel.'''

View attachment 531531
...most wars are not total wars
...most wars end on cease fires, not unconditional surrenders
etc etc
You have a pretty low standard as to what constitutes a success.
 
Wrong. Biden ordered the withdrawal based upon an arbitrary date despite all facts pointing to failure and proceeded to ignore the Taliban was violating the withdrawal agreement just so he could meet his arbitrary date.
This is 100% on Biden.
You'll support the next war and if you live long enough to see it too end with a whimper you will still not have learned a thing.
 
occupied yes, again, you do not understand or know much about the military--you prove it with all your posts .....
..most wars are contained and end in cease fires--NOT unconditional surrender .....
 
Vietnam was very winnable.


We won in Vietnam. We secured the sovereignty of South Vietnam with the Paris Peace Accord, which was the objective all along. However, the filthy Democrats couldn't stand the fact we won against the Communists so they passed the Case Church Act that gave the green light to the North Vietnamese to invade.
 
occupied yes, again, you do not understand or know much about the military--you prove it with all your posts .....
..most wars are contained and end in cease fires--NOT unconditional surrender .....
Wars are one thing and occupations are another. The missions are so different that war fighters seem to be at a loss as to how to pacify a population.
 
Flash the objective was to keep South Vietnam ...doesn't matter when we got out ...EXACTLY like Afghanistan, we could've been there for 20 years--no change
 
occupied no--we are not trying to pacify the nations--wrong----we can't change Afghanistan or tried to do the same with Nam
..we were trying to train their army for THEM to pacify THEIR nation ....but like the South Vietnamese, you can train all you want and give them the best weapons--but they did not have the will
..JUST LIKE JFK said on Vietnam
''''''but we can't win it for them"''''
 
Thats just another way to say "we lost"
..the objective was not to take over Afghanistan ......these wars are super complex ...I suggest you listen to War Stories podcasts ......they tell you what REALISM is
 
We won in Vietnam. We secured the sovereignty of South Vietnam with the Paris Peace Accord, which was the objective all along. However, the filthy Democrats couldn't stand the fact we won against the Communists so they passed the Case Church Act that gave the green light to the North Vietnamese to invade.
We what?

Jesus
 
Asclepias you people have no knowledge of their history or the war history .....we had to ''''work with'''' warlords/etc that had connections to BOTH sides!!! etc
 

Forum List

Back
Top