Acquired Blindness

Wow, strikingly similar to how you treat anyone that disagrees....Some would say projection....
This poster once was talking about how COVID deaths aren't all COVID deaths and pointed to the death of a man who fell off a ladder and was coded as COVID.

Which was an interesting case because at autopsy they found that this man actually had no life ending injuries from the fall (he fell onto grass/dirt) but he did have lungs that were LOADED with COVID and inflammation consistent with severe disease and he was complaining of shortness of breath the days prior to his fall. The autopsy concluded he had some cardiac arrest due to low oxygen from the severe COVID and that's why he fell off the ladder.

I pointed this out including the paper that was published talking about the case and that this poster provided a great example of something that on it's face appeared foolish but in reality was quite the opposite.

The poster did little but personally attack me and duck any recognition of the facts of the matter.
 
This poster once was talking about how COVID deaths aren't all COVID deaths and pointed to the death of a man who fell off a ladder and was coded as COVID.

Which was an interesting case because at autopsy they found that this man actually had no life ending injuries from the fall (he fell onto grass/dirt) but he did have lungs that were LOADED with COVID and inflammation consistent with severe disease and he was complaining of shortness of breath the days prior to his fall. The autopsy concluded he had some cardiac arrest due to low oxygen from the severe COVID and that's why he fell off the ladder.

I pointed this out including the paper that was published talking about the case and that this poster provided a great example of something that on it's face appeared foolish but in reality was quite the opposite.

The poster did little but personally attack me and duck any recognition of the facts of the matter.
So, based on one anecdotal case you are dismissing the premise? I would think that someone who thinks they are so different from the OP, would come up with a better response than anecdotal evidence...And more than one if you were trying to make an anecdotal case...But instead you attack the character of the OP, which is an ad hom attack, and the pervue of the usual loser in any debate...So, if you don't want to be compared to what you think she is, then stop acting like what you think she is....Simple.
 
So, based on one anecdotal case you are dismissing the premise? I would think that someone who thinks they are so different from the OP, would come up with a better response than anecdotal evidence...And more than one if you were trying to make an anecdotal case...But instead you attack the character of the OP, which is an ad hom attack, and the pervue of the usual loser in any debate...So, if you don't want to be compared to what you think she is, then stop acting like what you think she is....Simple.
No, just providing an example of such behavior.

Is that the kind of behavior you think demonstrates good character?
 
No, just providing an example of such behavior.

Is that the kind of behavior you think demonstrates good character?



"....good character?"


These Leftists have no shame.

That one was long ago revealed as lying scum.


! You’re the lying low-life who tried to lie about what I wrote!!!!



You lied and claimed I said it.....when I proved that you did.





Let's do it again.

I never said what you keep claiming I said....you said it....and I don't mind continuing to prove it with your own words.


Did I say 'therefore...blah blah blah...' or did you?

Let's check:

Here's your own post, proving you are lying scum:
You did and I quoted you saying it.

You: "Since you are so fond of copying and pasting your responses, I’m guessing you don’t really read them. I’ll quote it again in case you decide to look at this again.
PoliticalChic said:
The 'rich' are Democrats.



The rich are Democrats therefore they aren’t Republicans. "






But you didn't quote me. You simply posted an interpretation of what I said, and lied about me saying it.
"therefore" was your word, as is everything after that words.

Every word after 'therefore' is yours.......not mine, liar.

Every reader recognizes you a lying scum.

If you hurry, I bet you can scoop up a new avi..."LyingLow-LifeScum.'

I want this series of posts to be what readers recall whenever you post.

 
But you didn't quote me. You simply posted an interpretation of what I said, and lied about me saying it.
I guess you never took logic.

If A is not B and if C is A, then C cannot be B.

It’s not an interpretation. It’s logic.

Logic which you will continue to refuse to address as you refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn’t fit your fragile world view.
 
No, just providing an example of such behavior.

Is that the kind of behavior you think demonstrates good character?
I think at times giving what you get is warranted. Overall though if you are looking for posters in here attacking others with snarky baseless insult, start with a mirror.
 
I think at times giving what you get is warranted. Overall though if you are looking for posters in here attacking others with snarky baseless insult, start with a mirror.
Baseless? I just told you exactly what my basis is.
 
All lies that have been exposed.....yet you continue to parrot them.

What a Good German you are.


Democrats lie about everything….on what basis would any of their fabricated data be considered valid???
Here the prism through which every Democrat pronouncement should be viewed: First collusion, collusion, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia, Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction. Racist, Racist, Racist, Impeach, Impeach, Impeach, Recession, Recession, Recession, Emoluments, 25th amendment, “HandsUpDon’tShoot,”Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the Kavanaugh hoax, the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ General Flynn perjury trap, no evidence of voter fraud in the stolen election.....and “More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son."



Don’t forget the Democrats told you that Trump was colluding with Russia…and that wasn’t true. They also told you that so was Naval Academy grad Carter Page and so was George Papadopoulos and so was General Michael Flynn, a three star general and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency….and all of that was a lie. How stupid must one be to keep believing what they say?
...and, AOC lying about her near-death experience in the Capitol Riots.....when she wasn't even in the Capitol.

And that Biden voters as agents provocateur weren't behind the Capitol Riot.....and that Pelosi knew and refused to allow extra security. They lie about everything.......yet Democrat voters are, ready to swallow the next lie.

And that the Wuhan Red Death did not come from a Chinese Communist lab that got its funding via Dr. Fauci, and its purpose was to remove Trump….

FakeStories: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’? The great lie that there was an ‘insurrection’ January 6th. The lie that it was Republicans who wanted to defund the police. The lie that Critical Race Theory wasn’t being ta,00ught. The lie that 600,000 died from the Wuhan Red Death.
What should you do when they lied to you at least these 30 times already???????????
Seriously, did you just repost the OP? I mean how lame. I have already refuted most of what was in the OP and you have yet to provide a rebuttal. I have taken apart, piece by piece, the tweet from Cardillo. Can you tweet him and see if he can maybe come up with a rebuttal because I am sure you are not going to make an attempt.
 
Seriously, did you just repost the OP? I mean how lame. I have already refuted most of what was in the OP and you have yet to provide a rebuttal. I have taken apart, piece by piece, the tweet from Cardillo. Can you tweet him and see if he can maybe come up with a rebuttal because I am sure you are not going to make an attempt.


Every reader knows you were lying, simply supporting the lies and hoaxes that have already been exposed.


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?


I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….
 
Every reader knows you were lying, simply supporting the lies and hoaxes that have already been exposed.


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?


I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….
Long winded non response to his charges. Just more blather from the inept shill.
 
Your list is stupid, let's take them one by one.

Highest crime rate in decades. Sorry, but the highest crime rates happened in the 00's, and it is just unbelievable that in a mere ten months a Biden presidency could reverse that trend. Going to need some documentation here, with real statistics, because from my research I am not seeing it. But of course, you are being willfully ignorant, some dipshit right wing yahoo makes the claim and you don't even attempt a cursory examination because you want to believe it so damn bad.

Afghanistan taken by Taliban. Good God almighty, Trump actually negotiated with the Taliban and left the government of Afghanistan sitting on the sidelines. He forced that government, sitting on the sidelines, to release thousands of prisoners. Hell, he and his dumbass Secretary of State, actually trusted the Taliban and proclaimed they would help Americans leave and would fight terrorists. What a bunch of dumbshits.

Crippling debt and inflation. Biden has failed to pass any significant legislation, the debt is from Trump's spending and his ill-advised pandering flipping tax cuts. Inflation is more a function of an economy returning from the deep ass hole Trumps ineptitude handling the corona virus delivered, and the supply chain problems that have a basis in Trump's actions, not Biden. It doesn't help that dumbasses, probably like you, are hording and stocking up on things like toilet paper and pet food.

CDC discredited. That is your right wing rags talking. The CDC could have performed better, but again, Trump cut the funding for research on pandemics and then wants to play the victim card. You guys are such idiots.

DOJ fully weaponized. Are you flippin kidding me. No administration in the history of the country "weaponized" the DOJ more than Trump. Hell, he wanted that department to cancel a legitimate election, not to mention he wanted it to target his enemies and protect his friends. I mean you have to have your head so far up your ass that you can't see the sun shine to make such a claim and defend Trump.

Border crisis. WTF--I thought Trump was going to build a beautiful wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. You address the border problem by addressing the reasons the immigrants come here, like the gang wars in their country of origins and collapsing social systems. Trump do any of that? Hell no, and now we pay the price as our economy begins to heat up. Besides, you flippin morons are constantly complaining about a lack of labor, and then you complain when the labor we needs attempts to come here. Damn idiots.

No longer energy independent. Good God, we never were energy independent. I mean we might have could have been, if we would have maintained the restrictions in exporting energy. But no, we instead allow those refineries to export diesel, the very definition of STUPID. And we export natural gas, another stupid move. And I know you don't realize this, but the Biden administration has seen the greatest increase in oil drilling on public lands since Bush Jr. Sure, new permits are not being issued, but it is kind of like gun control, perhaps we should wait till those companies actually exercise the permits they already have instead of issuing more.


1634584436681.png
 
There are few on this board more condescending than Political Chic.
There are a few on this board.... maybe only one in fact that actually does the homework.... Examines the research....Frames a reasonable argument generally free from vituperation and insults and then puts in the real effort it takes to get all the punctuation spelling and syntax correct so that is so that it is legible and readable.

Political chic makes an impact on this place because her stuff is high quality and consistent. Now as the whether or not it agrees with your viewpoints that's another subject altogether. However we should take care to remember the basics of the English language which is no longer actually taught in public schools.

Condescension and acuity are not synonyms.

Jo
 
6. So….what should an individual do?



“Do Not Be Afraid of Judging Others or Giving Offence

A deep friendship should be antifragile. The English historian Henry Thomas Buckle famously remarked: “Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest, by their preference for the discussion of ideas.”

In the pursuit of happiness, we should strive to establish friendships with individuals with whom we can experience the full range of cerebral engagement. This can’t happen if we are too afraid to disagree with our close friends on consequential issues. Choose your friends wisely. In a similar way, many well-intentioned individuals are too afraid to judge others.”
Gad Saad



7. Do not fear losing friends, or confronting those who will never by your friends, as long as you can state a carefully considered view, and have the ability to support same with documentation.

In fact, that is an obligation every one of us should assume.

Who writes this dreck?
 
There are a few on this board.... maybe only one in fact that actually does the homework.... Examines the research....Frames a reasonable argument generally free from vituperation and insults and then puts in the real effort it takes to get all the punctuation spelling and syntax correct so that is so that it is legible and readable.

Political chic makes an impact on this place because her stuff is high quality and consistent. Now as the whether or not it agrees with your viewpoints that's another subject altogether. However we should take care to remember the basics of the English language which is no longer actually taught in public schools.

Condescension and acuity are not synonyms.

Jo
Boy, do we disagree on that. This poster produces meandering long winded posts half full with gibberish that reflects conventional right wing hackery and hysteria.
 
There are a few on this board.... maybe only one in fact that actually does the homework.... Examines the research....Frames a reasonable argument generally free from vituperation and insults and then puts in the real effort it takes to get all the punctuation spelling and syntax correct so that is so that it is legible and readable.

Political chic makes an impact on this place because her stuff is high quality and consistent. Now as the whether or not it agrees with your viewpoints that's another subject altogether. However we should take care to remember the basics of the English language which is no longer actually taught in public schools.

Condescension and acuity are not synonyms.

Jo


With great appreciation and gratitude.


It's difficult to make an Asian blush, but I believe you just did.

Thank you again.
 
Boy, do we disagree on that. This poster produces meandering long winded posts half full with gibberish that reflects conventional right wing hackery and hysteria.
I laid out point for point what her strengths are and avoided the mentally vacant broad brushing that you just demonstrated. I have yet to see an OP from her that is not well researched, carefully vetted for verfiable references and done journalistically " by the book". That is totally different subject from the one you're dealing with inasmuch as your dislike for her viewpoints. But you see that's the problem..... What you call rambling I call carefully constructed argumentation done in detail. What do you call Hackery I call sensible, logical and reasonable opinion. What you call Hysteria I call a disagreement with your particular viewpoint.

There are a few lefties here who put in a similar effort and I am quick to note when they do it and do not hesitate to pat them on the back for their efforts even if I disagree with them. However by and large most of the left-wing posters here lead with emotional lunacy heavily seasoned with political predilection and topped with generous dollops of personal insult, dismissal and out and out blood curdling hatred based on nothing more than blind, uncurious preference.

jo
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top