Poll — Majority of Democrats ‘Unsure’ or Say U.S. Would Be Better Off If Trump Murdered

yeah, yeah it was a poll of 1000 people and a loaded question

are u better off if trump murdered ?

wow who pays for a survey based on that question and is is relevant to anything

loaded question and one that insures one answer when asking

bull shit question with a bull shit answer


compare that to the number who actually vote it is not even 1% of people voting

They give you want you want to hear based on a low sampling assuming they were democrats. Loaded question.

I wonder what republicans were say if the name was switched.


Yet Trump says this

Donald Trump: 'If I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the country!'​


No poll just one man opinion with followers who wants to keep power. That was a threat of a coup and overthrowing the government using nicer words.

No poll just the guy who wants to be president.

same guy who sent rioters to stop the steal. Yet he told them to be peaceful

what went wrong? there was no steal.

and they were not peaceful
 
Last edited:
This is breitbart bullshit.

Breitbart – Bias and Credibility​

View attachment 1014378
View attachment 1014379
Once again your intelligence and credibility are in the cess pool.

From the first paragraphs of the link;
....
"
This poll of 1,000 registered voters was taken by Scott Rasmussen, president of RMG research, on September 16-17 on behalf of Napolitan News.

“The desensitization of some Americans following the second assassination [attempt] of former President Trump is alarming,” writes Napolitan News. “Seventeen percent (17%) of voters believe America would have been better off if former President Trump had been killed in last week’s attempted assassination.” "
....

Here's the survey;
Some rather disturbing demographics.
 
It's just hard to imagine any way the establishment is going to allow Trump to be president. Killing him aside.

The risk of Trump interfering with the war against Russia is just too great!

Trump made his intentions known when he declared that America started the war and is to blame!

Sing
Sing one song
Make it the same, every time.
 
Once again your intelligence and credibility are in the cess pool.

From the first paragraphs of the link;
....
"
This poll of 1,000 registered voters was taken by Scott Rasmussen, president of RMG research, on September 16-17 on behalf of Napolitan News.

“The desensitization of some Americans following the second assassination [attempt] of former President Trump is alarming,” writes Napolitan News. “Seventeen percent (17%) of voters believe America would have been better off if former President Trump had been killed in last week’s attempted assassination.” "
....

Here's the survey;
Some rather disturbing demographics.
1000 voters with a loaded questionnaire were used in this survey

81,283,098 who voted and that million for those who don't know.

Sample of bullshit is still bullshit

It really equates to a sample of 0

But I am sure donora paid good money for it
 
1000 voters with a loaded questionnaire were used in this survey

81,283,098 who voted and that million for those who don't know.

Sample of bullshit is still bullshit

It really equates to a sample of 0

But I am sure donora paid good money for it

You may not know how polling works.
 
You may not know how polling works.

What its a sample of people opinions and no names are used. So they can say whatever they want. Whether it is true or not

a survey of 1000 people claiming to be democrats. Easy money and I would tell them I am republican in order to get paid or just mess around/

still a sample of 1000 is not indicative of anything and the questions were not reality question but what if scenarios

People doing a survey may mark it as (what if or what they might do) but in reality would they do it if it risk actually jail time ?

Surveys will not make the distinction

It is whatever floats that the taker wants to flat

accurate surveys would require a representative number of people who might do this

there is a difference between hypothetical questions looking for what one might do versus what one would be willing to do


List of the Disadvantages of Survey Research​

1. There is always a risk that people will provide dishonest answers.
that is a biggie as with no name involved, they can say whatever floats
assuming that they are honest is just an assumption


 
You may not know how polling works.
He/she/it doesn't.

First one establishes the demographics: age, gender, race/ethnic, political leaning, etc. Then you lead off with some generic and/or inoxious questions before unloading with the more pointed and focused one(s).

If one were to bother with reading the embedded links and then the links within the links they would get some basics of the way the poll is conducted and the validity of the process, and the firm conducting.

One could also look at the actual data on breakout of those polled and their responses to see what the real message~content is about.

Even if it was 10,000 or 100,000 the results would still likely be quite close to each sampling size and the original 1,000.

A good possibility that "Kilroy 2" never took/passed a course in statistical analysis.
 
This is not surprising since Democrats gleefully murder their own babies. Democrats polled said that the assassination of a candidate for president is for the best and 25% were not sure. We have crossed a major line. We now have a majority of one of the two main political parties in America either approving government by assassination or are on the fence.



This is exactly why I say the America I knew is already gone.

People have lost their minds and no one cares.
 
1000 voters with a loaded questionnaire were used in this survey

81,283,098 who voted and that million for those who don't know.

Sample of bullshit is still bullshit

It really equates to a sample of 0

But I am sure donora paid good money for it
About 44% claimed to be GOP or lean GOP. With @ 47% claim to be Democrat or lean Democrat.

You could look over the results table and start with some data rather than your biased wild conjecture.
 
This is not a political divide. This is the radicalization of half of your population through media and education.

Tell me again how America and the West are going to win in the increasingly dangerous geo-political environment we now live in?
I can only address the United States. The best way (in my own opinion) for our nation is to:
1. Fire all Marxists in our educational system (K-12, colleges and universities) and charge them with sedition, as they are actively trying to undermine and overthrow our government.
2. Mandate that high school thru college have mandatory classes covering our Constitution and the Federalist Papers, as they come under a history class of the founding of our nation.
3. Any individuals that are "required" to take the oath to support the Constitution and are found to be actively against they swore to support, be fired for violating that very oath.
 
I can only address the United States. The best way (in my own opinion) for our nation is to:
1. Fire all Marxists in our educational system (K-12, colleges and universities) and charge them with sedition, as they are actively trying to undermine and overthrow our government.
2. Mandate that high school thru college have mandatory classes covering our Constitution and the Federalist Papers, as they come under a history class of the founding of our nation.
3. Any individuals that are "required" to take the oath to support the Constitution and are found to be actively against they swore to support, be fired for violating that very oath.
Yes, corruption and lack of accountability will destroy a nation. We have many in Canada who violate their oaths and there is little interest in holding them to account, hence why by every measure Ontario is in free fall with little prospect for succees as a jurisdiction on the horizon. All aelf induced. Surely America observes other locales and can use them as a warning to their own future if they follow.the same path.
 
I can only address the United States. The best way (in my own opinion) for our nation is to:
1. Fire all Marxists in our educational system (K-12, colleges and universities) and charge them with sedition, as they are actively trying to undermine and overthrow our government.
2. Mandate that high school thru college have mandatory classes covering our Constitution and the Federalist Papers, as they come under a history class of the founding of our nation.
3. Any individuals that are "required" to take the oath to support the Constitution and are found to be actively against they swore to support, be fired for violating that very oath.
1. Along with fire, don't hire those who subscribe to the Marxist ideology. As for sedition, they would have to be active in some way. My understanding is a large number of those involved in the Summer 2020 AntiFa and BLM insurrections were teachers and Marxists and should have forfeited their employment as educators on public funds. Freedom of speech is one thing, actions counter to oaths are another.

2. Yes long over due. With regard to the Constitution especially.
....
The United States Constitution, America’s most important document, stands as a testament to the tenacity of Americans throughout history to maintain their liberties, freedoms and inalienable rights. And, Constitution Week is celebrated annually during the week of September 17-23 to commemorate its history, importance, and bring attention to how it serves still today.

This celebration of the Constitution was started by the Daughters of the American Revolution. In 1955, DAR petitioned Congress to set aside September 17-23 annually to be dedicated for the observance of Constitution Week. The resolution was later adopted by the U.S. Congress and signed into public law on August 2, 1956, by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
...

Constitution Day Resources | Constitution Center

Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, and Constitution Week, 2024

As for the Federalist Papers, they are rather extensive so an overview or "Clift's Notes" version would be more appropriate I think.

BTW, since history, especially USA, seem to be getting dropped more from mandatory curriculum, they should definitely be added.
Perhaps having to pass the INS Citizenship Test as well.

Civics (History and Government) Questions for the Naturalization Test​

3. Why have an oath in the first place if not going to uphold it and hold oath takers accountable ???

BTW, I used to live in Auburn, still have a son and grandson there.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom