ACLU pops corks with Al Qaeda as Obamanable Admin gives “shout out” KSM

[WillowTree]

Much has been written over the past 24 hours that does well to explain why the Obama Regime’s despicable decision to bestow unprecedented constitutional protections on those whose only connection to America is that they have directed the incineration of thousands of our innocent countrymen or worked not quite as “successfully” for the same or worse. So, I can’t really add much of substance in commenting on the news itself.

A sampling of those from Jay’s post from last night: Smack Down of Obama Administration on KSM Trial Decision

And guess who celebrates this as some sort of victory for “justice?”

It’s no secret that the greatest threats to America on the international stage can depend on the ACLU’s extended hand of friendship. The ACLU, as the most dangerous threat to this country from within, has long been writhing around passionately with every enemy of this country like mating slugs at the end of a mucus thread. That the ACLU not only cheers this latest attack on American national security is no surprise. After all, they are up to their ear holes in making sure KSM and Da Boyz get sprung, although the MSM seems to be ignoring the ACLU role. Jay wrote last year at PJM about the execrable “John Adams Project” that undoubtedly played a lead role in securing three hots and a cot for KSM while he awaits his circus trial:





ACLU pops corks with Al Qaeda as Obamanable Admin gives “shout out” KSM : Stop The ACLU

The ACLU has launched an initiative called the “John Adams Project.”…What is it? In a nutshell, the ACLU has assembled a “Dream Team” of attorneys with an $8.5 million budget to defend terrorists currently held at Guantanamo. Who’s the primary object of the ACLU’s affection? Khalid Sheik Mohammed.

The ACLU, true to form, impugns the professionalism and competence of men and women of infinitely more honor than their accusers by referring to tribunals as “kangaroo courts.” But could the ACLU really be so scandalized that this mass murderer will stand before a military tribunal? Could the ACLU truly be standing up for his “fundamental rights?”

What is the true purpose of a multi-million-dollar campaign to get KSM off the hook?

The ACLU explains: “The ACLU chose to focus on Mohammed’s defense, Romero said, because he appears to be “the government’s top priority in the prosecution. And whether or not they are able to convict Khalid Sheik Mohammed under these rules may well determine the fate of the almost 300 other men who are detained at Guantanamo.”

 

[rightwinger]

Freaking human rights!

Why do them Libruls always want to follow the law?

Lets see......they launched an attack against Americans on American soil and they are being tried for their crime in American courts

 

[chanel]

The ACLU hates American. Well at least the law abiding tax paying judeo/Chistian ones.

How much of our tax money goes to them?

 

[Luissa]

Much has been written over the past 24 hours that does well to explain why the Obama Regime’s despicable decision to bestow unprecedented constitutional protections on those whose only connection to America is that they have directed the incineration of thousands of our innocent countrymen or worked not quite as “successfully” for the same or worse. So, I can’t really add much of substance in commenting on the news itself.

A sampling of those from Jay’s post from last night: Smack Down of Obama Administration on KSM Trial Decision

And guess who celebrates this as some sort of victory for “justice?”

It’s no secret that the greatest threats to America on the international stage can depend on the ACLU’s extended hand of friendship. The ACLU, as the most dangerous threat to this country from within, has long been writhing around passionately with every enemy of this country like mating slugs at the end of a mucus thread. That the ACLU not only cheers this latest attack on American national security is no surprise. After all, they are up to their ear holes in making sure KSM and Da Boyz get sprung, although the MSM seems to be ignoring the ACLU role. Jay wrote last year at PJM about the execrable “John Adams Project” that undoubtedly played a lead role in securing three hots and a cot for KSM while he awaits his circus trial:





ACLU pops corks with Al Qaeda as Obamanable Admin gives “shout out” KSM : Stop The ACLU

The ACLU has launched an initiative called the “John Adams Project.”…What is it? In a nutshell, the ACLU has assembled a “Dream Team” of attorneys with an $8.5 million budget to defend terrorists currently held at Guantanamo. Who’s the primary object of the ACLU’s affection? Khalid Sheik Mohammed.

The ACLU, true to form, impugns the professionalism and competence of men and women of infinitely more honor than their accusers by referring to tribunals as “kangaroo courts.” But could the ACLU really be so scandalized that this mass murderer will stand before a military tribunal? Could the ACLU truly be standing up for his “fundamental rights?”

What is the true purpose of a multi-million-dollar campaign to get KSM off the hook?

The ACLU explains: “The ACLU chose to focus on Mohammed’s defense, Romero said, because he appears to be “the government’s top priority in the prosecution. And whether or not they are able to convict Khalid Sheik Mohammed under these rules may well determine the fate of the almost 300 other men who are detained at Guantanamo.”

how many years has that guy been sitting in Gitmo without going to trial?

 

[WillowTree]

Much has been written over the past 24 hours that does well to explain why the Obama Regime’s despicable decision to bestow unprecedented constitutional protections on those whose only connection to America is that they have directed the incineration of thousands of our innocent countrymen or worked not quite as “successfully” for the same or worse. So, I can’t really add much of substance in commenting on the news itself.

A sampling of those from Jay’s post from last night: Smack Down of Obama Administration on KSM Trial Decision

And guess who celebrates this as some sort of victory for “justice?”

It’s no secret that the greatest threats to America on the international stage can depend on the ACLU’s extended hand of friendship. The ACLU, as the most dangerous threat to this country from within, has long been writhing around passionately with every enemy of this country like mating slugs at the end of a mucus thread. That the ACLU not only cheers this latest attack on American national security is no surprise. After all, they are up to their ear holes in making sure KSM and Da Boyz get sprung, although the MSM seems to be ignoring the ACLU role. Jay wrote last year at PJM about the execrable “John Adams Project” that undoubtedly played a lead role in securing three hots and a cot for KSM while he awaits his circus trial:





ACLU pops corks with Al Qaeda as Obamanable Admin gives “shout out” KSM : Stop The ACLU

The ACLU has launched an initiative called the “John Adams Project.”…What is it? In a nutshell, the ACLU has assembled a “Dream Team” of attorneys with an $8.5 million budget to defend terrorists currently held at Guantanamo. Who’s the primary object of the ACLU’s affection? Khalid Sheik Mohammed.

The ACLU, true to form, impugns the professionalism and competence of men and women of infinitely more honor than their accusers by referring to tribunals as “kangaroo courts.” But could the ACLU really be so scandalized that this mass murderer will stand before a military tribunal? Could the ACLU truly be standing up for his “fundamental rights?”

What is the true purpose of a multi-million-dollar campaign to get KSM off the hook?

The ACLU explains: “The ACLU chose to focus on Mohammed’s defense, Romero said, because he appears to be “the government’s top priority in the prosecution. And whether or not they are able to convict Khalid Sheik Mohammed under these rules may well determine the fate of the almost 300 other men who are detained at Guantanamo.”

how many years has that guy been sitting in Gitmo without going to trial?

for as long as the aclu has been obstructing the progress I think.

 

[rightwinger]

Defending the Constitution??


The bastards!

 

[Luissa]

Much has been written over the past 24 hours that does well to explain why the Obama Regime’s despicable decision to bestow unprecedented constitutional protections on those whose only connection to America is that they have directed the incineration of thousands of our innocent countrymen or worked not quite as “successfully” for the same or worse. So, I can’t really add much of substance in commenting on the news itself.

A sampling of those from Jay’s post from last night: Smack Down of Obama Administration on KSM Trial Decision

And guess who celebrates this as some sort of victory for “justice?”

It’s no secret that the greatest threats to America on the international stage can depend on the ACLU’s extended hand of friendship. The ACLU, as the most dangerous threat to this country from within, has long been writhing around passionately with every enemy of this country like mating slugs at the end of a mucus thread. That the ACLU not only cheers this latest attack on American national security is no surprise. After all, they are up to their ear holes in making sure KSM and Da Boyz get sprung, although the MSM seems to be ignoring the ACLU role. Jay wrote last year at PJM about the execrable “John Adams Project” that undoubtedly played a lead role in securing three hots and a cot for KSM while he awaits his circus trial:





ACLU pops corks with Al Qaeda as Obamanable Admin gives “shout out” KSM : Stop The ACLU

how many years has that guy been sitting in Gitmo without going to trial?

for as long as the aclu has been obstructing the progress I think.

you keep telling yourself that.

 

[WillowTree]

how many years has that guy been sitting in Gitmo without going to trial?

for as long as the aclu has been obstructing the progress I think.

you keep telling yourself that.

I will. cause I believe in truth..

 

[WillowTree]

http://www.tcf.org/Publications/HomelandSecurity/wang-tribunals.pdf

 

[rightwinger]

If we captured AlQaeda prisoners in Afghanistan who committed crimes against the Afghan people we would have no juristiction to try them here.

In these cases, the crime was committed in the US against US citizens. The juristiction resides within the US in Federal Court.

 

[WillowTree]

If we captured AlQaeda prisoners in Afghanistan who committed crimes against the Afghan people we would have no juristiction to try them here.

In these cases, the crime was committed in the US against US citizens. The juristiction resides within the US in Federal Court.

why? it was committed in New York. Why doesn't New York have jurisdiction? and btw,, even your own messiah said it was an act of war,, that these dudes committed "war crimes." just so ya know.

 

[Luissa]

for as long as the aclu has been obstructing the progress I think.

you keep telling yourself that.

I will. cause I believe in truth..

why didn't Bush have a militarty tribunal or even a trial? Are you going to blame the ACLU for keeping the man in prison without a trial?
When we start acting like our enemies, it doesn't matter if we win the war.
The crime was commited in New York, so therefore the trial is being held there.
Get over it, at least Obama is doing something about it.

 

[WillowTree]

you keep telling yourself that.

I will. cause I believe in truth..

why didn't Bush have a militarty tribunal or even a trial? Are you going to blame the ACLU for keeping the man in prison without a trial?
When we start acting like our enemies, it doesn't matter if we win the war.
The crime was commited in New York, so therefore the trial is being held there.
Get over it, at least Obama is doing something about it.

obama is making political payback to the aclu,, don't ever doubt that,, btw,, did you listen to the video in his own words??? It's in a thread entitled "War Crimes" huh? and if it happened in New York why isn't it "The State of NY vs.. " huh???

 

[Luissa]

I will. cause I believe in truth..

why didn't Bush have a militarty tribunal or even a trial? Are you going to blame the ACLU for keeping the man in prison without a trial?
When we start acting like our enemies, it doesn't matter if we win the war.
The crime was commited in New York, so therefore the trial is being held there.
Get over it, at least Obama is doing something about it.

obama is making political payback to the aclu,, don't ever doubt that,, btw,, did you listen to the video in his own words??? It's in a thread entitled "War Crimes" huh? and if it happened in New York why isn't it "The State of NY vs.. " huh???

gee I don't know because it is a federal crime.

 

[L.K.Eder]

the aclu are bastards, until you need them to take up your case of domestic abuse.

 

[WillowTree]

why didn't Bush have a militarty tribunal or even a trial? Are you going to blame the ACLU for keeping the man in prison without a trial?
When we start acting like our enemies, it doesn't matter if we win the war.
The crime was commited in New York, so therefore the trial is being held there.
Get over it, at least Obama is doing something about it.

obama is making political payback to the aclu,, don't ever doubt that,, btw,, did you listen to the video in his own words??? It's in a thread entitled "War Crimes" huh? and if it happened in New York why isn't it "The State of NY vs.. " huh???

gee I don't know because it is a federal crime.

it was a "war crime" the words of your messiah.. By his own admission one guy has admitted to murdering 3000 Americans and the aclu is going to do all in it;'s power to set hhym free.. Yessir.. Political goldmine.. It's gonna be a fun fun ride.. The decision has been made. and as you say "we will deal with it." don't expect it to go well though pollyanna.. newp!

 

[WillowTree]

I keep forgetting the SCOTUS decision.. the aclu thumbs it's nose at the SCOTUS.. Yep