No matter how much you want to restrict responses to two options, there is a third one; the only one that is reasonable; and it is this:
I will accept the findings of any deliberative body when their ruling is based upon credible and convincing evidence. I will reject as illegitimate any ruling that is based upon unsupported opinion.
In the real world, mere opinions are meaningless. The most ignorant, the most corrupt, the most dishonest and vile oxygen-wasting debris among us is just as capable of having an opinion as the most noble and enlightened among us. That which distinguishes the intellectual elite from the intellectually challenged is the basis for their opinions. Opinions based on facts are meritorious; those based upon prejudice and ignorance are worthless.
In this particular case, anyone with a few dozen fully functional brain cells knows that there is a possibility of a politically motivated investigation; therefore accepting their conclusion in advance of their opinion is foolish.
Perhaps you remember how the democrats insisted that Trump unconditionally agree in advance to the election results. Than, upon losing the election the dimwitted, corrupt, hateful, unhinged liberals challenged Trump's victory in ways that are without precedent in our country's history. They even went so far as to try to change the votes of the electoral college using threats of physical violence. Trump was both intellectually and morally superior to every one of these ultra-liberal goons.
The question you posed was: Will you agree with the special investigations final conclusions? Based upon the aforementioned rationale my response is: that depends. And as they say, that's my final answer.