About Those J6 “People”

[Political-Junkie]

Bad conflating on your part, but keep grabbing at straws.

What's the difference between the two? Neither went into the Capitol. Neither assaulted police. Both took years until the FBI went after them. If anything, Banuelos' crime was worse than Epps, yet the FBI went after him about a year after they went after Epps.

 

[Knuckles Z]

Read it and choke. Don't know if you're a Rat or a RINO... matters not.

Pelosi’s Jan. 6 Trap Exposed as 7 FBI Agents Turn State’s Evidence​

It was all a scam. On Monday, May 26, 2026, recent leaks and speculation became reality. Seven FBI agents planted inside the US Capitol grounds crowd on January 6, 2021 have agreed to turn state’s evidence to avoid prosecution.

In a compelling reversal that tears apart the Democrats’ January 6 lies and mainstream media narratives, the agents have turned in their sworn statements.

Federal prosecutors confirmed the agents’ sworn statements expose a coordinated entrapment operation run by the Biden Justice Department and directly coordinated with then Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office. As undercover operatives, they have admitted how they were ordered to blend in with peaceful Trump supporters, encourage entry into restricted areas, and assist in breaching barriers.

Read more here:

Pelosi’s Jan. 6 Trap Exposed as 7 FBI Agents Turn State’s Evidence

It was all a scam. On Monday, May 26, 2026, recent leaks and speculation became reality. Seven FBI agents planted inside the US Capitol grounds crowd on January 6, 2021 have agreed to turn state’s …

cleverjourneys.com

 

[Knuckles Z]

See if you can rationally explain how they incited a riot at the Capitol that was already declared a riot before they got to the Capitol? Were they calling random MAGA at the Capitol inciting them? Were they tweeting them? Texting them? Using up a wish with a genie?

Check above Jasper.

 

[Lesh]

Check above Jasper.

And see what?

A bunch of unsubstantiated claims?

 

[beagle9]

It's not a metaphor. Trump told that crowd that Pence could reject electors to flip the election, but that he wasn't sure if Pence would do it or not. That's not a metaphor.

That incited some to make death threats "if Pence caves." That's not a metaphor.

Pence doesn't go along with Trump's attempted theft, and some of his supporters go apeshit. That's not a metaphor.

When Pence "caved," Trump made sure everyone there knew, tweeting how "Pence didn't have the courage..." That's not a metaphor.

None of that implicates Trump as being anything you idiots attempt to claim he is or that he didn't do.

 

[beagle9]

They did bring him in right away. They determined he didn't go into the Capitol or assault police so they let him go and took his name off of their list of seeking information.

Yeah, and that doesn't piss you idiots off that he was given a pass after strong video evidence in a collage showed him inciting and possibly engaging in what you people called (an insurrection) ?????

Look we didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday dumb ace.........

 

[Political-Junkie]

Check above Jasper.

Hey, I'm pulling for ya of that comedy gold working out the way you hope it is.

Meanwhile, thanks for not being able to explain how FBI agents, who weren't even at the Capitol when the riot broke out, started it.

 

[beagle9]

Hey, I'm pulling for ya of that comedy gold working out the way you hope it is.

Meanwhile, thanks for not being able to explain how FBI agents, who weren't even at the Capitol when the riot broke out, started it.

Knuckles presented you the link or article, so go do your homework and get back with him with information that proves him wrong. It's simple really...

 

[Political-Junkie]

Yeah, and that doesn't piss you idiots off that he was given a pass after strong video evidence in a collage showed him inciting and possibly engaging in what you people called (an insurrection) ?????

Look we didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday dumb ace.........

Who did he incite? People around him rebuffed his calls to go into the Capitol.

 

[beagle9]

Who did he incite? People around him rebuffed his calls to go into the Capitol.

Wow, now that is truly a stretch of your imagination. So you attempt to throw something out that deflects from his actions of culpability when it comes to the evidence against him ?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Knuckles presented you the link or article, so go do your homework and get back with him with information that proves him wrong. It's simple really...

Oh, trust me, I'm doing my homework. Here's the first example of what garbage this claim is.

One of the witnesses this article cites is Michael Shane Daughtry. This is what Mr. Daughtry claims, according to this article.

On January 6th 2021, I traveled to Washington DC with my wife Tammie to watch the Trump Rally. As the rally was completing, the President of the United States told the crowd to go to the West Lawn and “peacefully” protest, which we did.

As we arrived at the West Lawn, the police officers removed the barricades and waved us onto the West Lawn. I had video of this but the FBI later raided my home and confiscated this Video.​

But here is his charging statement from when he was arrested.

11. In a separate January 6th post, the defendant claimed, “We just tore down the fence and stormed the Capitol.” On January 6, 2021, the defendant also spoke with a Pelham, Georgia Police Officer who recorded the conversation. In this communication the defendant stated he was at the Capitol and was among those “that tore the fence down up there. We was the first ones over the fence. Everyone followed us.” The defendant did not enter the Capitol but remained within in the restricted area around Capitol on January 6, 2021.​

Here's the post he sent on January 6, 2021.

This article cites a proven liar, damaging its own crediblity. The proven liar says police moved barricades to let him in when the truth is, on J6 he admitted to breaking in through a fence. Now, as a convenient excuse, he claims the police confiscated his video evidence of police waving him in, when the truth is, since he broke in, there is no video evidence of police letting him in.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Wow, now that is truly a stretch of your imagination. So you attempt to throw something out that deflects from his actions of culpability when it comes to the evidence against him ?

Thanks for your admission he didn't incite anyone.

 

[Mac1958]

Oh, trust me, I'm doing my homework. Here's the first example of what garbage this claim is.

One of the witnesses this article cites is Michael Shane Daughtry. This is what Mr. Daughtry claims, according to this article.

On January 6th 2021, I traveled to Washington DC with my wife Tammie to watch the Trump Rally. As the rally was completing, the President of the United States told the crowd to go to the West Lawn and “peacefully” protest, which we did.​

​

As we arrived at the West Lawn, the police officers removed the barricades and waved us onto the West Lawn. I had video of this but the FBI later raided my home and confiscated this Video.​

But here is his charging statement from when he was arrested.

11. In a separate January 6th post, the defendant claimed, “We just tore down the fence and stormed the Capitol.” On January 6, 2021, the defendant also spoke with a Pelham, Georgia Police Officer who recorded the conversation. In this communication the defendant stated he was at the Capitol and was among those “that tore the fence down up there. We was the first ones over the fence. Everyone followed us.” The defendant did not enter the Capitol but remained within in the restricted area around Capitol on January 6, 2021.​

Here's the post he sent on January 6, 2021.

View attachment 1263863

This article cites a proven liar, damaging its own crediblity. The proven liar says police moved barricades to let him in when the truth is, on J6 he admitted to breaking in through a fence. Now, as a convenient excuse, he claims the police confiscated his video evidence of police waving him in, when the truth is, since he broke in, there is no video evidence of police letting him in.

They'll never take responsibility for the Insurrection. They can't. They can't even admit there WAS an Insurrection.

 

[Mick2]

So you continue to make claims which have no basis in reality

You claim “grammas “ got worse treatment than Epps yet you can’t tell us who these grandmas are.

You’re just full of shit

I don't know all th ins and outs of every specific case but I do know that hundreds were grossly mistreated. I presume some of those indeed had grandchildren. This is pretty bad treatment in the link below. Some of these people were sentenced (or facing the possibility of a sentence) of multiple decades behind bars:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4745821-supreme-court-jan-6-obstruction-charge/

....for crimes they DID NOT nor COULD not commit. Hundreds of J6ers charged wrongly.

 

[Mick2]

They'll never take responsibility for the Insurrection.

Who is "they"?

The partisan J6 committee that went belly up after getting exposed? The hundreds who were charged with crimes they didn't commit by Biden's justice department and were later exonerated by the Supreme Court? The FBI Director Christopher Wray who violated FBI protocols and sent in hundreds of plain clothes agents for "crowd control" whe they had no training to control crowds? Nancy Pelosi, who as Speaker could have summoned additional securitiy for the Capitol on the day of protest, but refused?

It was a protest that got rowdy and turned into a riot. You're one of the dweebs that keeps using the term "Insurection" even though your side has been swatted around in the courts and on the ground time after time here. Stop being a douche bag.

 

[Mick2]

Who from BLM killed anyone?

Just one such tiny examples of far too many where "BLM" hate and rhetoric inspired assassinations of LE and whites:

12 officers shot, 5 killed in Dallas attack

Twelve police officers were shot during protests in downtown Dallas on Thursday.

www.wxyz.com

You're a vile human being

 

[Correll]

You admitted it above again. We are prepared to resist any MAGA attack. We are not preparing to attack you. That's the dif.

You focus on the ONE riot and ignore your own side's HUNDREDS of riots, and want bring the hammer down, on the ONE riot and then whine like a little girl for years, eventually decades about it when we pardon your victims.

That is you attacking. And oppressing.


You are choosing increased conflict over traditional peaceful transfer of power.

 

[Correll]

Say what? Pointing out criminals should be locked up regardless of their political affiliation is going to start a civil war? That's unhinged.

You don't get to set the framework.

That you want to, doesn't change the fact.

YOU are choosing ever increasing escalation, and refusing to give the slightest consideration to the OTHER side perspective.


Where do you think that leads? To a happy place?

Try to be less retarded.

 

[Correll]

You actually have no evidence he's connected to the FBI. That the FBI took their time with him is not evidence as there were others as well who took years for the FBI to get to.

The year long pass is strong evidence. YOur stonewalling is you being a BAD FAITH DEBATER, and an ASSHOLE.

As others have pointed out, it's imperative for you to make him a scapegoat in order to avoid blaming the real culprits of January 6th, MAGA.

I would have been fine with the rioters of 1/6 being treated like all the other rioters of the time period.

It was when Biden turned it into a POLITICAL PROSECUTION and POLITICAL PRISONERS, that I stopped being fine with it.

I've said this many times before. Your repeated lies otherwise, is just you being an asshole and cowardly avoiding the real issue.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You don't get to set the framework.

That you want to, doesn't change the fact.

YOU are choosing ever increasing escalation, and refusing to give the slightest consideration to the OTHER side perspective.


Where do you think that leads? To a happy place?

Try to be less retarded.

Actually I do get to set that framework because it's the law.

Are you saying the RW is justified to respond to speech they don't like with violence?