About Those J6 “People”

[Correll]

Who from BLM killed anyone?

Again

Name names

You can’t

There are dead people on the ground and in graves now.

YOu thinking that the amish used the blm riots as cover to hit their enemies?

 

[Correll]

You're confused. That's what trump's DoJ is doing.

Nope. YOu saying that, doesn't make it so.

 

[Marener]

Meanwhile in the real world, dem mayors siding with the rioters vs teh people, is a real problem. So...let's just keep that in mind moving forward.

Are you thinking of the way they are cracking down on teh somali theives that stole tens of millions, if not more, from funds for children and austic people?

I’m thinking of the way they’re prosecuting protestors, the way they’re handling immigration, the unwarranted investigations to political enemies.

For example:

After "Broadview Six" case falls apart, U.S. Attorney orders "sweeping" grand jury reforms

Days after dropping all charges in the "Broadview Six" case over improper grand jury handling, U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros announced new rules and training for federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois.

www.cbsnews.com

They did not dserve to have their rights violated.

Your support of that, is yours support of increased conflict.

You claim I support violating their rights, but that’s false. I don’t.

You’re making allegations that I believe are false and refuse to substantiate them. When challenged, you try to change the subject and act indignant that anyone would dare question you.

Your shit talk is noted and dismissed. The more you do that, the more maga reading your words, realize that you are utterly remorseless in your emnity.

This is not “shit talk”. It is trying to point out that you’re being misled. Again, you would have a stronger argument if you could identify a factual basis for it, which you consistently refuse.

 

[berg80]

You need to stop thinking that shit talk matters.

The fact remains. Your point was refuted. Epps got a pass at a time when the hammer was being brought down hard and wide.

That's strong evidence, right there.

You remind me of my neighbor, a trump voter. We get along as long as we don't discuss politics. He made the mistake of bringing up politics the other day so in rebuttal I sent him an article explaining the corruption behind trump having purchased stock in Dell followed by trump promoting the company, then Dell being given a multiple million dollar defense contract.

My neighbors response, "Please don't send me biased media articles. I don't read them." The article was a factual recounting of the timing of the stock purchase and what trump corruptly did to get the stock to rise. It made me think of the saying.........."My mind's made up, don't confuse me with the facts."

 

[berg80]

Nope. YOu saying that, doesn't make it so.

True. But him doing it does. How many instances of cases being dismissed against trump's political enemies will it take before you acknowledge the vindictive prosecutions he has told the DoJ to pursue. E. Jean Carroll being the latest.

For Reid Hoffman and E. Jean Carroll, Trump’s DOJ looks like the Department of Payback​

The U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Northern District of Illinois has been in the news a lot lately — and for some disturbing reasons.

The Justice Department has reportedly opened an inquiry into a Chicago-based nonprofit backed by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and is considering possible charges of money laundering. According to The New York Times, the inquiry is focused, at least for now, on Hoffman’s nonprofit, American Future Republic, which helped fund certain legal expenses in E. Jean Carroll’s civil cases against President Donald Trump. The U.S. attorney’s office has said it has not opened a criminal investigation into Carroll, the New York writer who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s, although the reporting makes clear that prosecutors are examining the accuracy of statements made during the civil litigation about outside funding.

Opinion | The DOJ investigation of Reid Hoffman's nonprofit has an unmistakable backdrop

Duncan Levin: The broader pattern is hard to ignore because the targets are not random. Federal prosecutorial power is being used not simply to enforce law but to relitigate political conflict through the criminal process.

www.ms.now

 

[Correll]

I’m thinking of the way they’re prosecuting protestors, the way they’re handling immigration, the unwarranted investigations to political enemies.

For example:

After "Broadview Six" case falls apart, U.S. Attorney orders "sweeping" grand jury reforms

Days after dropping all charges in the "Broadview Six" case over improper grand jury handling, U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros announced new rules and training for federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois.

www.cbsnews.com

Wow. So useful for discussion purposes.


"While Boutros' office did not provide specifics on the changes being made, "

You claim I support violating their rights, but that’s false. I don’t.

You’re making allegations that I believe are false and refuse to substantiate them. When challenged, you try to change the subject and act indignant that anyone would dare question you.

This is not “shit talk”. It is trying to point out that you’re being misled. Again, you would have a stronger argument if you could identify a factual basis for it, which you consistently refuse.

I've been discussing this issue with leftards the whole time. The support from the left is unwavering.

This is a valid point of discussion. You lefties shit talking is not helpful.


The willingness of the left to violate our rights, is a real problem.

 

[Correll]

You remind me of my neighbor, a trump voter. We get along as long as we don't discuss politics. He made the mistake of bringing up politics the other day so in rebuttal I sent him an article explaining the corruption behind trump having purchased stock in Dell followed by trump promoting the company, then Dell being given a multiple million dollar defense contract.

My neighbors response, "Please don't send me biased media articles. I don't read them." The article was a factual recounting of the timing of the stock purchase and what trump corruptly did to get the stock to rise. It made me think of the saying.........."My mind's made up, don't confuse me with the facts."

A possible valid issue.

YOu know what another valid issue is? I recall the way that a leftard made a joke at a public hearing about white male suicides and hoping that white males died out, and the lefties laughed about it.


So, yeah. Making money unethically is bad, if it happened the way you claim.

But, the other side wants me dead. So, my choice is pretty easy here.

 

[berg80]

"While Boutros' office did not provide specifics on the changes being made, "

At this point, even if Carroll is not formally the subject of the investigation, the criminal inquiry looks less like an ordinary money-laundering or perjury investigation than an effort to use federal prosecutorial power to revisit a credibility fight Trump already lost in court.

The lead prosecutor for these investigations is Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros. His office made headlines recently over its prosecution of protesters who came to be known as the “Broadview Six.” The cases collapsed amid extraordinary revelations about prosecutors’ conduct before the grand jury.

 

[Marener]

Wow. So useful for discussion purposes.


"While Boutros' office did not provide specifics on the changes being made, "

I hope you read the whole article because if you stopped at the second paragraph, you would have missed a lot of factual information that demonstrates the DoJ acting illegally and unconstitutionally. The case against the left wing protestors was dismissed because the prosecutors violated the rules with the grand jury and tried to cover it up.

I've been discussing this issue with leftards the whole time. The support from the left is unwavering.

This is a valid point of discussion. You lefties shit talking is not helpful.


The willingness of the left to violate our rights, is a real problem.

Before we accept whether it’s a problem, shouldn’t we establish whether the left has actually violated anyone’s rights in the way you claim?

That would form the basis for discussion.

 

[Correll]

True. But him doing it does. How many instances of cases being dismissed against trump's political enemies will it take before you acknowledge the vindictive prosecutions he has told the DoJ to pursue. E. Jean Carroll being the latest.

For Reid Hoffman and E. Jean Carroll, Trump’s DOJ looks like the Department of Payback​

The U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Northern District of Illinois has been in the news a lot lately — and for some disturbing reasons.

The Justice Department has reportedly opened an inquiry into a Chicago-based nonprofit backed by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and is considering possible charges of money laundering. According to The New York Times, the inquiry is focused, at least for now, on Hoffman’s nonprofit, American Future Republic, which helped fund certain legal expenses in E. Jean Carroll’s civil cases against President Donald Trump. The U.S. attorney’s office has said it has not opened a criminal investigation into Carroll, the New York writer who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s, although the reporting makes clear that prosecutors are examining the accuracy of statements made during the civil litigation about outside funding.

Opinion | The DOJ investigation of Reid Hoffman's nonprofit has an unmistakable backdrop

Duncan Levin: The broader pattern is hard to ignore because the targets are not random. Federal prosecutorial power is being used not simply to enforce law but to relitigate political conflict through the criminal process.

www.ms.now

1. I can't know if the case being dismissed means that case was weak, or if the case just ran into a retarded judge who insists on pretending that this is the old days of civil politics instead of civil conflict.


2. Also, you try to kill a man four times, and then whine like a little girl that he is being mean to you? Kind of makes you look weak and pathetic.

 

[jacksonlamb]

ALT is just an excuse for your side to not care about their victims.
So, if you want to cope, keep it in your head please.

I am. Hope you are.

 

[jacksonlamb]

And here you again play retard to hide from the point. I didn't say you SAID shit. I said that your behavior, SHOWS YOUR INTENT. And it does.
Your want to have your way, and you are prepared to have a civil war to get it. The idea that the other side, might be able to have a turn, and win on policy? THAT is what is out of the question, not killing millions. Killing millions, you are fully prepared to do. Giving maga it's turn, letting our voices be heard, that is TABOO, for you. You would rather see our cities on fire, with blood in the streets.

You admitted it above again. We are prepared to resist any MAGA attack. We are not preparing to attack you. That's the dif.

 

[berg80]

I hope you read the whole article because if you stopped at the second paragraph, you would have missed a lot of factual information that demonstrates the DoJ acting illegally and unconstitutionally. The case against the left wing protestors was dismissed because the prosecutors violated the rules with the grand jury and tried to cover it up.


Before we accept whether it’s a problem, shouldn’t we establish whether the left has actually violated anyone’s rights in the way you claim?

That would form the basis for discussion.

The office first downgraded from felony charges to misdemeanors and also reduced the number of defendants; last week it dismissed charges against the remaining individuals indicted last October after protesting outside of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Broadview, Illinois. Boutros said in court proceedings that prosecutors’ conduct during the grand jury process led to the dismissal.

The conduct was stunning: Prosecutors reportedly interacted with grand jurors outside normal proceedings, improperly vouched for witnesses, and even removed or sidelined grand jurors viewed as skeptical of the government’s case. At one point, the judge, who noted the conduct was redacted from grand jury transcripts she was shown, remarked that she had never seen such conduct before.

 

[Marener]

The office first downgraded from felony charges to misdemeanors and also reduced the number of defendants; last week it dismissed charges against the remaining individuals indicted last October after protesting outside of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Broadview, Illinois. Boutros said in court proceedings that prosecutors’ conduct during the grand jury process led to the dismissal.

The conduct was stunning: Prosecutors reportedly interacted with grand jurors outside normal proceedings, improperly vouched for witnesses, and even removed or sidelined grand jurors viewed as skeptical of the government’s case. At one point, the judge, who noted the conduct was redacted from grand jury transcripts she was shown, remarked that she had never seen such conduct before.

It’s stunning misconduct by the DoJ, and Correll wants them to go further.

 

[berg80]

It’s stunning misconduct by the DoJ, and Correll wants them to go further.

Correll is an attention seeking trump fanboy who I have come to realize isn't worth engaging with. He's too far gone. I just put him on ignore.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You left out teh context.

ie the context of the fbi arresting EVERYONE, and holding them forever without charges, while they tried to put together cases that their rigged courts could slam though.


Yet, Epps got a pass, for from may 21, to sept 23.

That that looks fine to you, is you being a lying whore.

Because Epps didn't go into the Capitol or assault police.

 

[Political-Junkie]

I got that you are fine with continuing to CIVIL WAR.

I asked you if you have given ANY thought to the costs, or if it is a good idea.

Say what? Pointing out criminals should be locked up regardless of their political affiliation is going to start a civil war? That's unhinged.

 

[beagle9]

That is what makes it so interesting.

The commies KNEW he was an agent provocateur, so they were coll with him.

They liked the GUY IN TRUMP GEAR DEMANDING THE CAPITOL BE BREACHED because they KNOW he was working with the Feds to damage Trump.

It is also why they do not want those responsible for the Gallows punished and also why they ignore May 29.

The communists have done a wonderful job brainwashing these stupid effs.

Yes, very interesting indeed..

 

[beagle9]

Because Epps didn't go into the Capitol or assault police.

Matters not... The video evidence should have been enough to bring him in. What are they still or rather were they hiding the whole time ?

 

[Political-Junkie]

The year of PASS, while they brough the hammer down on everyone else,


if very, very strong evidence he is a fbi agent or asset.

Your denial of this is you being a bad faith actor.

You actually have no evidence he's connected to the FBI. That the FBI took their time with him is not evidence as there were others as well who took years for the FBI to get to.

As others have pointed out, it's imperative for you to make him a scapegoat in order to avoid blaming the real culprits of January 6th, MAGA.