About that now famous directive to Pam.

Repubs engage in political theater all the time. Garland put them in their place by simply reciting the facts.
Garland was taking orders from president auto-pen, and he was personally involved in the raid on Mar-A-Lago and every prosecution of Trump and his associates.

Facts didn't enter into the conversation when he was conducting his legal battles against Trump.

We have the proof of it.

Soon we will prove that Democrats had Charlie Kirk murdered. We know they incentivized the shooter.

G1Ji7aqaIAAufYG.webp
 
Garland was taking orders from president auto-pen, and he was personally involved in the raid on Mar-A-Lago and every prosecution of Trump and his associates.
Personally involved? He appointed Smith. After which Smith likely updated him on the progress of the investigation and he no doubt gave his approval to the indictments as any AG would.

As for other unproven assumptions you made in an effort to equate trump's order to go after Schiff, James, and Comey with Dotard's prosecution.......it failed.
 
Facts didn't enter into the conversation when he was conducting his legal battles against Trump.

We have the proof of it.
You have nothing of the kind. This is what proof looks like.

"What about Comey, Adam 'Shifty' Schiff, Leticia???" he wrote, referring to former FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done," he claimed, adding, "We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility."

"They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!" his post concluded.

 
I thought it was surprising, even for someone who has no fear of impeachment, or prosecution, or losing support from his base for anything he does, to be so open about an astonishingly corrupt directive given to his astonishingly corrupt AG.
Trump is proud of his crimes and corruption, and his equally corrupt AG.
 
Oooooooops.

White House admits Trump’s message to Bondi to prosecute enemies was supposed to be a DM: report​

Donald Trump’s Truth Social post urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute his perceived political enemies without “delay” was intended to be a private message, according to administration officials.

A post from the president’s account September 20 addressed to “Pam” demands “justice be served” against his former FBI director James Comey, who was indicted five days later.

Trump — suggesting in his post that the prosecution of his favored targets is retribution for his impeachments and indictments against him — believed he had sent Bondi the message directly, and was surprised to learn it was public, The Wall Street Journal reported.


I thought it was surprising, even for someone who has no fear of impeachment, or prosecution, or losing support from his base for anything he does, to be so open about an astonishingly corrupt directive given to his astonishingly corrupt AG.

There seems to be little doubt the message will be exhibit 1 when Jim Comey's lawyer asks the judge to dismiss the charges against him due to vindictive prosecution. I see no reason Letitia's attorney won't do the same. trump having handed them the motion on a proverbial silver platter.

The note to Pam to get going prosecuting trump's enemies, the firing of Seibert and his deputy to make way for the eminently compliant Lindsey Halligan, the hapless indictment of Comey minus pertinent details, the declination on the part of line prosecutors to touch either case for a lack of evidence...........it's like watching a satirical play, too absurd to be believable, being acted out in real life.
Good luck with that.
 
Personally involved? He appointed Smith. After which Smith likely updated him on the progress of the investigation and he no doubt gave his approval to the indictments as any AG would.

As for other unproven assumptions you made in an effort to equate trump's order to go after Schiff, James, and Comey with Dotard's prosecution.......it failed.
And Biden's order to go after Trump. Karma's a *****, eh?
 
He's telling his sycophants what to do, as expected. As predicted. As denied by the cult.

"But Biden!" -- Bullshit. This is an authoritarian regime, and the world sees it.
In the tweet, the President said "JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!" to Pam Bondi, the new leader of the Justice Department.

Only a Democrat could view that as somehow being a scandalous thing.

How dare the Orange Man Bad demand that the U.S. Justice Department actually serve justice? :mad:
 
You have nothing of the kind. This is what proof looks like.

"What about Comey, Adam 'Shifty' Schiff, Leticia???" he wrote, referring to former FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done," he claimed, adding, "We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility."

"They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!" his post concluded.

They're having to go on Super Orange Spin Mode™ for this one.

This would be much easier, and far more interesting, if they'd just admit what was actually happening, and what they're actually supporting. "Yes, we need a strongman autocrat now, as close to a dictator as we can get, punish and intimidate anyone who gets in the way, **** the spirit of the Constitution, I'm desperate, maybe we'll go back to the Constitution later".

Then we could discuss that. Maybe that would be interesting.

But no, they have to keep playing these tedious goddamn games.
 
Last edited:
Is that the best y'all lefties can come up with while a democrat candidate in Va. wants to put two bullets in the head of a republican and the favorite democrat candidate in Ca. implodes on camera?
 
Is that the best y'all lefties can come up with
You don't think the overt act of trump turning the DoJ in to a tool to be used to punish people the he is seeking revenge against is an impeachable event?
 
15th post
Why would Seibert, Song.......his deputy, and the line prosecutors in the VA office have recommended she not be prosecuted for a lack of evidence?
Politics and optics.

But not because of any concern with actual even-handed justice.
 
One of the advantages the anonymity afforded to posters on a message board provides is being able to be a flaming asshole without real world repercussions.
TRANSLATION: "this was so much easier when there was no internet for rebuttal, we just had professional hecklers do the news and all we had to do was nod, now we have to try and defend that nonsense"
 
One of the advantages the anonymity afforded to posters on a message board provides is being able to be a flaming asshole without real world repercussions.
I cannot confirm nor deny that claim as it would require firsthand knowledge to know for sure...now go ahead and flatter me berg :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom