About that insurrection

Yes, a apartment or house is mostly open space, that is the environment flash bangs are designed to be used in, NOT dense crowds of protestors or even rioters.
Yes, flash bangs are pretty standard use in riots.
 
How about showing even one of where flash bangs were fired INTO a crowd. they are fired in front of the crowd to make them disperse. The CP were firing them into the middle of the crowd in the videos that have been posted on this site. That will produce panic and cause casualties among the demonstrators.
They couldn’t fire them before the crowd because the crowd had slammed up against the police line shoving them back.

Which apparently was a “peaceful” thing to do.
 
Tell me what evidence supports the idea that the person busting out the window was antifa.
I think it is logical. For instance Antifa shows up at such demonstrations. It is one of their tactics. Others there were upset at the way cops shot at the demonstrationers when the demonstraitioners merely stood arould. It is believed that the cops assumed there were antifa there.

What is your evidence that Ashli Babbitt was superwoman able to merely step up into a window at least waist high of a tall man?

Here is my proposal. This will settle it all. Put officer Byrd on trial. There he would have his defense and evidence he did no wrong. I think it will happen.

This came from Wikipedia and supports men shoved her into the window.

Despite several calls of "he's got a gun", Babbitt, hoisted by two men, began to climb through the shattered window. She was then shot in her left anterior shoulder by Lieutenant Byrd and fell back among the other protesters.

Killing of Ashli Babbitt - Wikipedia​

 
You asked me if the killer of Ashli could retreat.

What he should have done is instruct the officers next to Ashli to detain her.
Or he could have retreated with a mob coming at him. Retreat was an option
 
They couldn’t fire them before the crowd because the crowd had slammed up against the police line shoving them back.

Which apparently was a “peaceful” thing to do.
On this very thread there is a video proving you are wrong.
 
Or he could have retreated with a mob coming at him. Retreat was an option
I guess. But he was on the other side of what amounted to a wall where he hid as he stalked Babbitt and murdered her.
 
I think it is logical. For instance Antifa shows up at such demonstrations. It is one of their tactics. Others there were upset at the way cops shot at the demonstrationers when the demonstraitioners merely stood arould. It is believed that the cops assumed there were antifa there.

What is your evidence that Ashli Babbitt was superwoman able to merely step up into a window at least waist high of a tall man?

Here is my proposal. This will settle it all. Put officer Byrd on trial. There he would have his defense and evidence he did no wrong. I think it will happen.

This came from Wikipedia and supports men shoved her into the window.

Despite several calls of "he's got a gun", Babbitt, hoisted by two men, began to climb through the shattered window. She was then shot in her left anterior shoulder by Lieutenant Byrd and fell back among the other protesters.

Killing of Ashli Babbitt - Wikipedia

He wasn’t antifa.

You’re not logical.

 
I guess. But he was on the other side of what amounted to a wall where he hid as he stalked Babbitt and murdered her.
Yep, and it was open corridors behind with a mob in the front and one gun
 
On this very thread there is a video proving you are wrong.
Video shows the rioters were fighting with the police trying to keep them out of the Capitol.
you’re delusional.
 
Video shows the rioters were fighting with the police trying to keep them out of the Capitol.
you’re delusional.
Not before the flash bangs
 
They couldn’t fire them before the crowd because the crowd had slammed up against the police line shoving them back.

Which apparently was a “peaceful” thing to do.
First the cops. Those cops had armor on. Those cops had weapons including guns and clubs. They also had explosives. But you claim the crowd slammed them? With no evidence you make that claim?
 
First the cops. Those cops had armor on. Those cops had weapons including guns and clubs. They also had explosives. But you claim the crowd slammed them? With no evidence you make that claim?
It’s the video in the OP and everywhere else.
 
Video shows the rioters were fighting with the police trying to keep them out of the Capitol.
you’re delusional.
No it does not. It shows cops shooting at the standing crowd as if to harm them. And you wonder why they moved to the capitol where cops opened the doors?
 
Let’s say you’re right. Just pretend.

So what?
You don’t know what happens when people are threatened? Are you a child?

Civil war started with one canon shot.

600,000 eventually died
 
It’s the video in the OP and everywhere else.
The video I presented shows cops opened the doors. Why would cops open doors to rioters?
 
Video shows the rioters were fighting with the police trying to keep them out of the Capitol.
you’re delusional.
Again, we all know there were demonstrators. I know for a fact that the demonstrators went into the capitol only AFTER the cops opened the very heavy doors. And the so called rioters offered water to the cops. You are delusional.
 
I know for a fact that the demonstrators went into the capitol only AFTER the cops opened the very heavy doors.
Literally didn’t happen. You’re delusional.
 
Back
Top Bottom