Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In Canada abortion is a matter between a woman and her doctor. For women who are underage, the choice is hers and there is no parental consent involved.
If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. The fact that you think a woman's choice ends when she has sex shows that your real agenda is to enforce chastity.
Half the women who have abortions are married with one or more children. Are you seriously suggesting married women abstain from sex with their husbands unless it's for procreation? You knows that's grounds for divorce in some jurisdictions.
Have you not heard of contraceptives? They allow you to have sex without getting pregnant.
If you don't want a baby, use them. They're not just for single people you know.
Should women be allowed to choose what they do with their bodies? Absolutely.
And they have plenty of options to choose from. Birth control pills, condoms, abstinence and natural sex.
Those are all choices.
Pregnancy isn't a choice; it's the outcome of a decision that had a choice.
And abortions aren't about a woman's body; they're about another body, very much alive, forming within the woman's body. So a woman's "right-to-choose" should be about what the woman does with her body; not the body of an infant she chose to have.
And if we can all agree that every human being is born with the inherent right to live, then abortions are clear violations of this right. As the baby is never consulted with when abortions are decided.
Should women be allowed to choose what they do with their bodies? Absolutely.
And they have plenty of options to choose from. Birth control pills, condoms, abstinence and natural sex.
Those are all choices.
Pregnancy isn't a choice; it's the outcome of a decision that had a choice.
And abortions aren't about a woman's body; they're about another body, very much alive, forming within the woman's body. So a woman's "right-to-choose" should be about what the woman does with her body; not the body of an infant she chose to have.
And if we can all agree that every human being is born with the inherent right to live, then abortions are clear violations of this right. As the baby is never consulted with when abortions are decided.
Great. So you want to punish the woman for getting pregnant by forcing her to have a baby she doesn't want.
Not to mention your rotten views on rape.
GTFO of a woman's body. Abortion is HER decision, not yours.
And no sweetie, I don't want to punish women. I don't want to punish anyone.
Pregnancy is their decision; not mine.
You however seem to want to punish an innocent fetus for something they have nothing to do with.
It's not a matter of punishing the fetus.
When most abortions are performed, the fetus is the size of a kidney bean and looks like a cocktail shrimp.
It certainly isn't aware of its existence, much less whether it's being "punished".
Here's the pure, pragmatic reality of abortion.
Women are going to get them no matter what the law is, and society is going to turn a blind eye to it. The wealthy will be able to get safe abortions and the poor with be on their own.
The primary problem that nutters have with this issue is that they consider a fetus to be a human being.
Get that fixed.....and you can turn your attention to preventing unwanted pregnancies in the first place as your best method to reduce the number of abortions.
Great. So you want to punish the woman for getting pregnant by forcing her to have a baby she doesn't want.
Not to mention your rotten views on rape.
GTFO of a woman's body. Abortion is HER decision, not yours.
Should women be allowed to choose what they do with their bodies? Absolutely.
And they have plenty of options to choose from. Birth control pills, condoms, abstinence and natural sex.
Those are all choices.
Pregnancy isn't a choice; it's the outcome of a decision that had a choice.
And abortions aren't about a woman's body; they're about another body, very much alive, forming within the woman's body. So a woman's "right-to-choose" should be about what the woman does with her body; not the body of an infant she chose to have.
And if we can all agree that every human being is born with the inherent right to live, then abortions are clear violations of this right. As the baby is never consulted with when abortions are decided.
So which is it, are you advocating placing women and their doctors in prison, or are you making a philosophical argument only.
As we know, the right to privacy prohibits the state from interfering with what a woman elects to do, as the Constitution makes paramount the womans liberty.
Assuming you accept the right to privacy with regard to abortion, what are your proposals to end the practice that don't involve a privacy rights violation?
Whoa, hold on there. Who said anything about prison?
I'm just against abortions. If a woman gets pregnant then she has the baby. It's as simple that.
If she doesn't want the baby she can give him or her up for adoption. She should have thought of that before she chose to have sex.
In Canada abortion is a matter between a woman and her doctor. For women who are underage, the choice is hers and there is no parental consent involved.
If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. The fact that you think a woman's choice ends when she has sex shows that your real agenda is to enforce chastity.
Half the women who have abortions are married with one or more children. Are you seriously suggesting married women abstain from sex with their husbands unless it's for procreation? You knows that's grounds for divorce in some jurisdictions.
Have you not heard of contraceptives? They allow you to have sex without getting pregnant.
If you don't want a baby, use them. They're not just for single people you know.
Have you never heard of contraceptives not working? The pill is not good for women's bodies. I know a woman who would like to have a kid but cannot because she was damaged by using the pill.
We would go along way to ending abortions if we considered it murder, and prosecuted the men who impregnanted these women as complicit in the crime. Or, as the perpetrators of the crime themselves. Men might be a bit more careful where and when they put their cocks.
True that, contraception doesn't always work, and it's a sad fact that many women use abortion as their main method of birth control.....And it's quite obvious that many women are ignorant of how their own bodies work.....And then are those that understand full well how their bodies work, yet they won't step up and take responsibility for their actions when their bodies produce human life. Nope, it's much easier to kill the inconvient lil' bastards, then it is to step up and do the right thing, and take resposibilty for their actions.In Canada abortion is a matter between a woman and her doctor. For women who are underage, the choice is hers and there is no parental consent involved.
If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. The fact that you think a woman's choice ends when she has sex shows that your real agenda is to enforce chastity.
Half the women who have abortions are married with one or more children. Are you seriously suggesting married women abstain from sex with their husbands unless it's for procreation? You knows that's grounds for divorce in some jurisdictions.
Have you not heard of contraceptives? They allow you to have sex without getting pregnant.
If you don't want a baby, use them. They're not just for single people you know.
Contraception doesn't always work.
For instance, my sister in law got pregnant the first time because a diet medication she was taking cancelled out the effect of her birth control pills. (This diet medication was later pulled from the market by the FDA).
God, you really are ignorant of how lady parts work, aren't you?
Have you not heard of contraceptives? They allow you to have sex without getting pregnant.
If you don't want a baby, use them. They're not just for single people you know.
Have you never heard of contraceptives not working? The pill is not good for women's bodies. I know a woman who would like to have a kid but cannot because she was damaged by using the pill.
Does the morning after bill damage a woman? Does having an abortion damage a woman? What we do know is that in EVERY abortion someone dies.
The primary problem that nutters have with this issue is that they consider a fetus to be a human being.
Get that fixed.....and you can turn your attention to preventing unwanted pregnancies in the first place as your best method to reduce the number of abortions.
Maybe you could enlighten us on when an unborn child becomes human. 1 years? 6 months? 1 min? What's the difference between a 1 min old baby and one due in 1 min?
Maybe it is your goulish attitude that needs fixed.
Should women be allowed to choose what they do with their bodies? Absolutely.
And they have plenty of options to choose from. Birth control pills, condoms, abstinence and natural sex.
Those are all choices.
Pregnancy isn't a choice; it's the outcome of a decision that had a choice.
And abortions aren't about a woman's body; they're about another body, very much alive, forming within the woman's body. So a woman's "right-to-choose" should be about what the woman does with her body; not the body of an infant she chose to have.
And if we can all agree that every human being is born with the inherent right to live, then abortions are clear violations of this right. As the baby is never consulted with when abortions are decided.
Noooooo, you were asked the question, first, LL.....answer it.The primary problem that nutters have with this issue is that they consider a fetus to be a human being.
Get that fixed.....and you can turn your attention to preventing unwanted pregnancies in the first place as your best method to reduce the number of abortions.
Maybe you could enlighten us on when an unborn child becomes human. 1 years? 6 months? 1 min? What's the difference between a 1 min old baby and one due in 1 min?
Maybe it is your goulish attitude that needs fixed.
Outrage!
You are too emotional, it seems, to have this discussion.
When do you think a fetus becomes a human being?
