In your original post, you wrote thatYou're a little late. The stupid pig who pretends to be vice president already picked a side blatantly and prevented funding for PP, but the government is still funding anti-choice organizations and more are applying to suck off the taxpayers' tit through programs like Title X. They already have the Hyde Amendment. If federally funded groups are prohibited from even mentioning the existence of abortion as an available choice, they should also be prohibited from pushing the anti-choice view. Equal funding or no funding.
Late??? I think you missed my point of the thread.
My position is no government funding for anyone and start a charity for your little righteous causes.
which is a statement that PP tells people what to do with their bodies, which it does not do.If these pro-abortion people don't want others telling them 'what to do with their body' what gives them the right to demand government funding to support an institution/agency (Planned Parenthood) to tell them what to do with their bodies?
Later you wrote that
when it is no longer the case that PP receives any federal funding, even for care that is not related to abortions.And anti-abortion groups are being forced to fund pro-choice initiatives like Planned Parenthood.
What should be done to make sure that anti-abortion groups do not receive federal funding if your position is no government funding for anyone?