Are you unamerican? Because you seem to be against the laws of this country. I don't know anything about Nazi's. You seem to know a lot about them maybe you are one.
And you know who agrees with you? ISIS.
Abortion is murder
- Thread starter The Great Goose
- Start date
And you know who agrees with you? ISIS.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
1. "Because you seem to be against the laws of this country."
Morality is the Litmus Test...not the law.
Unless you believe (I almost said 'think') that the Taney Supreme Court was correct in the Dred Scott Deciison (better look that up,huh?).
2. "I don't know anything...."
Truer words were never said.
Let's leave it at that.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Morality is the Litmus Test...not the law.
Unless you believe (I almost said 'think') that the Taney Supreme Court was correct in the Dred Scott Deciison (better look that up,huh?).
You can run, but you can't hide.
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us you sick mother fuckers.
Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you right wing wack jobs tried pushing your morality on us.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research (don't even argue you didn't because you did)
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us you sick mother fuckers.
Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you right wing wack jobs tried pushing your morality on us.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research (don't even argue you didn't because you did)
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
So often, when my responses to a dunce like you are undeniable.....you default to vulgarity.
Time and again, when folks realize that their political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.
That is why I never have to do the same.
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us you sick mother fuckers.
Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you right wing wack jobs tried pushing your morality on us.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research (don't even argue you didn't because you did)
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
So often, when my responses to a dunce like you are undeniable.....you default to vulgarity.
Time and again, when folks realize that their political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.
That is why I never have to do the same.
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us AGAIN. Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you guys tried pushing your morality on us it was a long hard 8 years. I hope people haven't forgotten.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us you sick mother fuckers.
Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you right wing wack jobs tried pushing your morality on us.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research (don't even argue you didn't because you did)
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
So often, when my responses to a dunce like you are undeniable.....you default to vulgarity.
Time and again, when folks realize that their political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.
That is why I never have to do the same.
Well please don't try to push your morality onto us AGAIN. Great reason not to vote for a Republican. I remember the last time we put a Republican in the white house and you guys tried pushing your morality on us it was a long hard 8 years. I hope people haven't forgotten.
a. You didn't allow stem cell research
b. You banned gays from marriage
c. Threw Jack Kavorkian in jail
d. and lets not forget
"You [Republicans] didn't allow stem cell research}
Let's make this the test of your knowledge.
Myth 1: Bush banned federal funding of hESC (human embryonic stem cell ) research. (Some people even thought that he outlawed the research itself.)
(1) from President Obama’s address on March 9, 2009: “we will lift the ban on federal funding for promising embryonic stem cell research.”
(2) from the media: “President Obama lifted the eight-year-old ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research yesterday…” – Washington Post, March 10, 2009
(3) from progressive websites: “With the stroke of a pen, President Barack Obama today erased the Bush administration’s eight-year-old restrictions on federal funding of research involving human embryonic stem cells, reaffirming his commitment to evidence and biomedical hope over his predecessor’s ideological distortion of science.” – Science Progress
(4) from bioethicists: "After eight years of zero-budget funding of embryonic stem cell research, it is hardly fair and completely disingenuous for critics to point to the practice and wonder why it lags four decades behind government-funded adult stem cell research," -- Art Caplan, University of Pennsylvania
Fact 1: Bush was the first to initiate the federal funding of hESC research.
Myth 2: Bush was a foe of science and stem cell research.
Supporting evidence:
(1) The signing of Obama’s executive order was “a momentous occasion for anyone who believes in the pursuit of biomedical knowledge for the betterment of human health." -- Harvard Stem Cell Institute researcher George Daley.
(2) "This marks a new era for stem cell research. It will not only impact research in the laboratory, but perhaps more importantly, it finally lifts the black cloud that has hovered over this research for so long. We have been operating for the last decade with one hand tied behind our back," -- Robert Lanza, science director of Advanced Cell Technologies.
(3) “Bush’s approach to the issue of embryonic stem cell research… showed a deep disregard for the role of scientific information in political decision-making.” -- Chris Mooney, The Republican War On Science
Fact 2: The NIH stem cell budget grew by leaps and bounds under Bush.
Myth 3: President Obama has greatly increased funding for human embryonic stem cell research.
Supporting evidence:
(1) “The order was issued just in time for researchers to take advantage of money in Mr. Obama's economic recovery package and use it for stem cell studies.” - NYTimes
(2) “The President's [March 9, 2009] decision does much more than expand funding for stem-cell research. It heralds a shift in the government's view of science, ushering in an era in which it promises to defend science — and the pursuit of useful treatments — against ideology.” – Time, March 9, 2009
Fact 3: Stem cell scientists are still waiting for the river of gold. Even though Obama removed Bush’s restrictions on federal funds for hESC research, he has barely increased the hESC budget.
MercatorNet: Barack, can you spare a dime?
President Bush announced, on August 9, 2001 that federal funds, for the first time, would be made available for hESC research on currently existing embryonic stem cell lines. President Bush authorized research on existing human embryonic stem cell lines, not on human embryos under a specific, unrealistic timeline in which the stem cell lines must have been developed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_controversy
Turns out you're pretty stupid, huh?
BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 19,307
- 1,590
- 85
.
that is true for taking any life, everyone is to some capacity a murder on a daily basis on planet Earth. the morality or lack of is purely subjective and for some self emasculating, PC ...
.
that is true for taking any life, everyone is to some capacity a murder on a daily basis on planet Earth. the morality or lack of is purely subjective and for some self emasculating, PC ...
.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
"...the morality or lack of is purely subjective..."
Of course it isn't.
Now for any who believe in God.
- Genesis 9:6 prescribed the death penalty for murder when it said that if a man “shed the blood” of another man, by man must his blood be shed. The only law repeated in all five of the books of the old testament. The death penalty is a value, values are eternal, as opposed to customs or traditions, such as stoning for adultery.
2. Exodus 21:12-14
Leviticus 24:17 and 21
Numbers 35:16-18 and Numbers 35:31
Deuteronomy 19:11-13
While the law of the land no longer requires a death penalty....the morality is clear.
I notice you did not question whether the unborn is a separate human being.
Divine Wind
Platinum Member
You are not only 100% wrong, but a cowardly piece of lying shit who will never admit they are wrong.
You are free to inject racism into the conversation, but you are not free to lie about others as you just did me. You, sir, are the pathetic one. Feel free to quote one racist thing I've said and we can discuss it. If not, then are you man enough to admit error? I strongly doubt so.
Divine Wind
Platinum Member
Agreed to an extent. The extent is not being born but 24 weeks which is why abortion law is what it is.
OTOH, the law gets muddied a murderer or assaulter causes a woman to lose a baby under 24 weeks. I'd like to see the law changed in that regard. Yes, causing a woman harm against her will to the extent she loses a <24 week fetus is certainly more than simply assaulting a woman and less than two murders.
Divine Wind
Platinum Member
Always an interesting topic. Is it? In all circumstances or just some circumstances?
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,434
- 12,289
- 2,180
You seem to be trying to somehow "win" points here. But you're not. Again, there is not just "left" and "right", Hillary is hardly what I would call left wing. She's more left wing than some in the US, but she's not really left wing either. Sanders is left wing. But then left wing and right wing is merely a statement of relativity within a political system.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Morality is subjective, so nobody has to agree with you. You lose again.
"Morality is subjective"
The required doctrine of the religion known as Liberalism.
Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…
Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
For liberals, evolution is the touchstone that separates the enlightened from the benighted.
And....Franklin Delano Roosevelt, "...the Socialist Savior of the Democratic Party."
the Catechism: you didn't build that.....any success is just dumb luck
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,434
- 12,289
- 2,180
It isnt Guns that do that it is Regressive policy of pushing fathers out of the home that do that. Guns keep a country safe from tyrannical governments.
But you can't take away the guns, which increase the murder rate four times hey?
First, there are lots of policies, or lack of policies, that are causing problems in the US.
You seem to be suggesting that the US govt is tyrannical. I wouldn't disagree with that, however if people voted properly then maybe govt wouldn't be so tyrannical. However go to Europe and there are a lot less guns, and somehow they don't have these problems of tyrannical govt.
Your brief summary doesn't tell me anything other than you just want to protect your guns and you aren't willing to look at the reality. This is the BIGGEST problem the US faces right now. An electorate which is uninterested in reality, but in partisan policies and protecting what they've been told to protect because this serves the main groups (ie the tyrannical govt) in keeping you where you are. How ironic.
Mudda
Silver Member
- Oct 23, 2015
- 8,015
- 341
- 95
- Banned
- #439
What are you rambling on about?Morality is subjective, so nobody has to agree with you. You lose again.
"Morality is subjective"
The required doctrine of the religion known as Liberalism.
Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…
Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
For liberals, evolution is the touchstone that separates the enlightened from the benighted.
And....Franklin Delano Roosevelt, "...the Socialist Savior of the Democratic Party."
the Catechism: you didn't build that.....any success is just dumb luck
Or is that your way of conceding the point?
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,434
- 12,289
- 2,180
Are you saying that American goats are killing babies in South Africa?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Was Obama’s Diddy connection hidden by the media for political reason the same way Biden’s dementia was covered up?- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 4
-
Who will be the Republican nominee in 2028 for POTUS and why are they a unique danger to democracy?
- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 3
-
-
Obama implicated in Diddy trial. Did Barry get crazy with the baby oil?
- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 25
-
Fifth-Colum sexual deviant activists in Main’s House, slapped down by Supreme Court
- Started by johnwk
- Replies: 1
