JoeB131
Diamond Member
That would be awesome for any fetus inside the uterus you don't have.As my definition stated it's a human being!
Unfortunately, most women don't agree with you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be awesome for any fetus inside the uterus you don't have.As my definition stated it's a human being!
Biology does, as does God, you lose!That would be awesome for any fetus inside the uterus you don't have.
Unfortunately, most women don't agree with you.
There is no God, and if we followed biology, we'd have a 10% maternal mortality rate and a 50% infant mortality rate.Biology does, as does God, you lose!
EDIT: posted to the wrong posterHave you bailing out of your responsibilities again?
Is this true?There is no God, and if we followed biology, we'd have a 10% maternal mortality rate and a 50% infant mortality rate.
Which part?Is this true?
the only reason for asking "Which part?" would be because at least some of it is not true [otherwise the answer would be yes or no]...which part is not true?Which part?
So the one in the womb was a homicide?Mr. Peterson was not at liberty to terminate what was not inside of his body.
And while not really connected to my original post. It's still good people understand who abortionists really are and decide if what they are doing is "women's health" or not.
And

GREAT reply.How many children have you carried in yer womb?
And while not really connected to my original post. It's still good people understand who abortionists really are and decide if what they are doing is "women's health" or not.
And
Added to my website. Thank you.
![]()
I say none of this from a religious standpoint or from a political standpoint. I am simply looking at this from a very stark and realistic point of view.
I have tried to examine abortion, look at others points of view and so on but I honestly see no rational or reasonable way to show abortion is not murdering a human being. There is simply no way that abortion is not murdering a child regardless of how you try to spin it.
First of all, if you have an abortion that means you have a child inside you. If you do not have a child inside you then there is nothing to abort. You can't have abortion before there is a child.
Second, once the egg is fertilized and implanted it's a baby. Sure it's a little blob, but unforseen circumstances aside, if you simply leave that blob alone it will be born in 9 months. Once a fertilized egg is implanted it starts a growth period of many stages lasting 17 to 19 years to become an adult. It doesn't matter if it's 11 days after conception or 3 years after conception, it's still a human being in different growth stages. Aborting it 3 weeks is the same as aborting it at 8 months, you are prematurely stopping the life of the baby before it can be born.
This whole "but it doesn't have a heartbeat" doesn't mean it isn't still a human growing inside its mother that if you simply leave it alone it will be born. How is it any different than if as soon as it's born you say "well it can't talk or even stand up so it isn't a human being so I'll end it's life". The only difference is you're saying it's ok to end the babies life before it has grown it's heart and ending it's life before it can talk, both are just ways to justify ending a babies life.
I say none of this from a religious standpoint or from a political standpoint. I am simply looking at this from a very stark and realistic point of view.
I have tried to examine abortion, look at others points of view and so on but I honestly see no rational or reasonable way to show abortion is not murdering a human being. There is simply no way that abortion is not murdering a child regardless of how you try to spin it.
First of all, if you have an abortion that means you have a child inside you. If you do not have a child inside you then there is nothing to abort. You can't have abortion before there is a child.
Second, once the egg is fertilized and implanted it's a baby. Sure it's a little blob, but unforseen circumstances aside, if you simply leave that blob alone it will be born in 9 months. Once a fertilized egg is implanted it starts a growth period of many stages lasting 17 to 19 years to become an adult. It doesn't matter if it's 11 days after conception or 3 years after conception, it's still a human being in different growth stages. Aborting it 3 weeks is the same as aborting it at 8 months, you are prematurely stopping the life of the baby before it can be born.
This whole "but it doesn't have a heartbeat" doesn't mean it isn't still a human growing inside its mother that if you simply leave it alone it will be born. How is it any different than if as soon as it's born you say "well it can't talk or even stand up so it isn't a human being so I'll end it's life". The only difference is you're saying it's ok to end the babies life before it has grown it's heart and ending it's life before it can talk, both are just ways to justify ending a babies life.
Raise a bruised fist if you have pounded your desk while ranting in this thread.
That sounds like the government's plan to tax unrealized gains.Second, once the egg is fertilized and implanted it's a baby. Sure it's a little blob, but unforseen circumstances aside, if you simply leave that blob alone it will be born in 9 months. Once a fertilized egg is implanted it starts a growth period of many stages lasting 17 to 19 years to become an adult. It doesn't matter if it's 11 days after conception or 3 years after conception, it's still a human being in different growth stages. Aborting it 3 weeks is the same as aborting it at 8 months, you are prematurely stopping the life of the baby before it can be born.
This whole "but it doesn't have a heartbeat" doesn't mean it isn't still a human growing inside its mother that if you simply leave it alone it will be born. How is it any different than if as soon as it's born you say "well it can't talk or even stand up so it isn't a human being so I'll end it's life". The only difference is you're saying it's ok to end the babies life before it has grown it's heart and ending it's life before it can talk, both are just ways to justify ending a babies life.
That sounds like the government's plan to tax unrealized gains.
Well killing dependent humans is a crime against humanity. You can't support abortion and human rights.Yep, that's why I used the word homicide.
Scott Peterson was convicted of double homicide under California's fetal homicide law.
https://vistacriminallaw.com/killing-a-fetus-in-california-crime-can-be-murder/