Abortion Is Finally Illegal -- And I Can't Wait To Sue

[playtime]

Raw numbers mean nothng in determioning how deadly a disease is..
Covid it has a 0.53% death rate; That's a little more than half the death rate as the flu.
You have been duped.

ummmmm.... the numbers may actually be higher, since the deaths recorded are those who died in the hospital & not at home. many that passed had underlying conditions - but the majority of those conditions were under control - & ultimately, covid is what killed them.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection fatality rates​

Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz 1, Lea Merone 2
Affiliations expand

• PMID: 33007452
• PMCID: PMC7524446
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1464

Free PMC article

Conclusion: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence on COVID-19 until July 2020, the IFR of the disease across populations is 0.68% (0.53%-0.82%). However, due to very high heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, it is difficult to know if this represents a completely unbiased point estimate. It is likely that, due to age and perhaps underlying comorbidities in the population, different places will experience different IFRs due to the disease. Given issues with mortality recording, it is also likely that this represents an underestimate of the true IFR [ infection fatality ratio ]figure. More research looking at age-stratified IFR is urgently needed to inform policymaking on this front.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection fatality rates - PubMed

 

[playtime]

Constitutional lawyers are saying it is -not -within his power to do what he has done thus far.
I'll take their opinion over the likes of authoritarains that say otherwise.

‘No Issue of Constitutionality’: Legal Experts Give Biden’s ‘Certainly Constitutional’ Vaccine Mandates the Go-Ahead​

COLIN KALMBACHERSep 9th, 2021, 8:42 pm
[...]
Legal experts, however, quickly noted that the vaccine mandates were likely to pass constitutional muster.

“Yes, this is constitutional,” famed constitutional law professor and Dean of Berkeley Law School Erwin Chemerinsky, told Law&Crime.

“There is no constitutional problem with requiring people be vaccinated,” the author of the premier constitutional case law textbook used in U.S. law schools added. “The government could require everyone to be vaccinated against COVID.”
[...]
“The issue is whether the government has the authority under some statute to order employers to require vaccination or weekly testing,” OSHA expert and Wake Forest University Law Professor Sid Shapiro told Law&Crime. “If such authority exists, it would be constitutional because Congress can regulate interstate commerce.”

New York City-based attorney and writer Luppe B. Luppen said the relevant statute was contained in OSHA’s authorizing legislation, the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, which was signed into law by then-president Richard Nixon.
[...]

New York University Law Professor Roderick Hills also agreed the OSHA mandate was constitutionally permissible.

“The OSH Act rule is certainly constitutional,” he told Law&Crime. “The federal government has regulated workplace safety since 1970, when Nixon signed the Occupational Safety and Health Act into law. The businesses covered by the Act are all regarded as either ‘in’ or ‘affecting’ interstate commerce and therefore within Congress’ power to regulate under Article I, section 8, clause 3 of the Constitution (the so-called ‘commerce clause’).”

Hills said the OSHA rules were likely to pass muster because they are authorized by the OSH Act itself which provides, in relevant part:

(a) Each employer —
(1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees;
(2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.

The only potential issue with the OSHA mandate, Hills said, was “neither constitutional nor statutory but procedural.”

“The OSH Administrator will likely have to go through notice and comment rule-making process to enact this policy unless the agency can take advantage of the exception for ‘good cause’ provided by section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act,” he continued.
'No Issue of Constitutionality': Legal Experts Give Biden's 'Certainly Constitutional' Vaccine Mandates the Go-Ahead

so.... again .... ' we'll see what happens... '

 

[playtime]

The unvaccinated choose to be unvaccinated, and they assume the risk of doing so.
The state has no responsibility to protect these people from the risk the choose to take, and no power to force me to do so.

okey dokey .... don't wear a seatbelt ... don't drive sober ... don't drive with yer lights on at night .... see what happens when yer pulled over by the po po......

 

[M14 Shooter]

ummmmm.... the numbers may actually be higher,

But not enough change the fact you have been duped into believing that Covid is insidiously deadly.
0.53% death rate, significantly less than influenza.

 

[M14 Shooter]

‘No Issue of Constitutionality’: Legal Experts Give Biden’s ‘Certainly Constitutional’ Vaccine Mandates the Go-Ahead​

Your op-ed pieces prove nothing.

 

[M14 Shooter]

okey dokey .... don't wear a seatbelt ... don't drive sober ... don't drive with yer lights on at night .... see what happens when yer pulled over by the po po......

I accept your concession of the point.

 

[playtime]

Your op-ed pieces prove nothing.

the osha reg is not an opinion.

nice try.

 

[playtime]

I accept your concession of the point.

 

[M14 Shooter]

the osha reg is not an opinion.

The article you posted, is.
Try again.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I, again, accept your concession of the point.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Such is the authoritarian right, more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.

But you DO agree: The law is constitutional.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Conservatives couldn't care less about ending abortion, it's about compelling conformity and punishing dissent.

But you DO agree: The law is constitutional.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The authoritarian right is infamous for its contempt for citizens' rights and protected liberties.

But you DO agree: The law is constitutional.

 

[playtime]

The article you posted, is.
Try again.

lol ... within that there article, jr .... are the links that spell it all out ever so clearly.

1. OSHA Laws & Regulations
2. OSH Act of 1970

OSH Act of 1970​

SEC.
5.
Duties
(a)
Each employer --
(1)
29 USC 654
shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees;
(2)
shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act.
(b)
Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct.
OSH Act of 1970 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46288

fact.

 

[M14 Shooter]

lol ... within that there article, jr .... are the links that spell it all out ever so clearly.

Nothing here changes the fact you posted an op-ed, which as no more meaning than any op-ed to the contrary.

 

[playtime]

Nothing here changes the fact you posted an op-ed, which as no more meaning than any op-ed to the contrary.

nope. but i understand you need that to cling onto.

 

[M14 Shooter]

nope. but i understand you need that to cling onto.

Why do you hold onto the false belief than an op-ed is proof of anything?

 

[playtime]

Why do you hold onto the false belief than an op-ed is proof of anything?

why do you hold onto the false belief that your opinion ... based on wishful thinking is proof of the contrary?

we'll see what happens.......................................

 

[M14 Shooter]

why do you hold onto the false belief that your opinion ... based on wishful thinking is proof of the contrary?
we'll see what happens.......................................

Can't answer the question eh?
No surprise.

 

[playtime]

Can't answer the question eh?
No surprise.

i answered it via facts. you still peddle an opinion based on hopes.