SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
Let's be clear:
The OP does not represent skepticism. Skepticism is an honest assessment of the facts, evidence, and arguments. A akeptic would not insist things are true which are demonstrably false and can be learned to be so by even the most cursory effort spent on research.
The OP is DENIAL and DOUBT, not skepticism. You guys insult skeptics and skepticism to call yourself skeptics.
Would a skeptic question a hypothesis to which there exists not a single shred of observed, measured evidence that supports said hypothesis over natural variability...
Would a skeptic question a claim to which there exists, not a single piece of observed, measured evidence in support of the claim?
I would say yes...now, what sort of person would be fooled by smoke and mirrors into believing in such hypotheses and claims without having seem the first piece of observed, measured evidence in their support?..a cultist?....an acolyte?...a f'ing idiot?.....a first class dupe?