$3 Trillion (annually) question

[CrusaderFrank]

As if to highlight that Global Warming is nothing but a wealth redistribution scheme, SecTres Yellen put a $3 TRILLION ANNUAL price tag on, well, we’re not sure what this buys for the climate.

But we’re POSITIVE it’s a redistribution of American wealth.

1. How much will CO2 be reduced in the first year?
2. How much will the temperature decrease?

 

[EMH]

According to highly correlated satellite and balloon data, adding Co2 to the atmosphere does NOTHING...

 

[MisterBeale]

As if to highlight that Global Warming is nothing but a wealth redistribution scheme, SecTres Yellen put a $3 TRILLION ANNUAL price tag on, well, we’re not sure what this buys for the climate.

But we’re POSITIVE it’s a redistribution of American wealth.

1. How much will CO2 be reduced in the first year?
2. How much will the temperature decrease?

How Elites Will Collapse America Like Rome: BlackRock, Trump vs Kamala & Market Crash | Whitney Webb​

Sep 3, 2024




Minute Mark; 51:00

00:00 Blackrock's role in economic crises and concerns.
08:44 Policy proposed, implemented, wealth transfer during COVID.
10:18 Blackrock's influence on US fiscal policy questioned.
17:53 Potential economic crisis expected regardless of election.
23:35 Emotion often hinders rational crisis response. Financial impact overlooked in favor of immediate solutions.
28:34 Political parties appoint Wall Street insiders to government.
33:27 Taxpayer money wasted through mismanaged contracts.
40:01 Social media used for mind control research.
47:18 US government's debt and war's impact.
50:48 Hyperinflation of dollar benefits Bitcoin, stable coins.
58:26 Satellite firm surveilling Latin America raises concerns.
01: 04:08 Cosine theorem, exploitation of natural resources, economic fairness.
01:10 :00 Financializing nature risks environmental exploitation and abuse.
01 :14 :46 Book "One Nation Under Blackmail" details Epstein scandal.
01 :19 :36 Power operates differently than we've been taught.
01:25: 03 Humans need to trust each other less.
01:28:59 Focus on digital ID's impact on freedom.
01:36:56 Silicon Valley's ties to military/intelligence raise concerns.
01:42: 02 Prepare for crisis, be self-sufficient, resist control.
01:47 :15 Chile offers more affordable living and healthcare.
01:49:34 Debt will lead to inevitable economic change.

 

[mamooth]

So about 3% of the global economy.

That's what has the deniers hysterical.

And that's just investment. Investments have a cash return.

Yes, deniers don't do economics.

 

[ding]

Yes, deniers don't do economics.

I'm pretty good with economics. You?

 

[ding]

And that's just investment. Investments have a cash return.

If these "green" projects were economically competitive, they would have been done long ago.

 

[ding]

So about 3% of the global economy.

That's what has the deniers hysterical.

I'm guessing you have never had a real job before.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So about 3% of the global economy.

That's what has the deniers hysterical.

And that's just investment. Investments have a cash return.

Yes, deniers don't do economics.

I’m sorry, I don’t speak gibberish. What are you babbling about and, more importantly, did you find a grown up to read the OP to you?

 

[mamooth]

I'm guessing you have never had a real job before.

Says the guy who doesn't understand the meaning of "3%" or "Investment".

A commonality among deniers is that they're dumber than dogshit across a broad array of topics. Their stupid is well-rounded.

 

[ding]

Says the guy who doesn't understand the meaning of "3%" or "Investment".

A commonality among deniers is that they're dumber than dogshit across a broad array of topics. Their stupid is well-rounded.

Honey, I've run economics on 500 million dollar projects. Anyone who tries to downplay the significance of a trillion dollar investment - let alone a 76 trillion dollar investment - is a dumb housewife who has never had to do anything business related except a household budget. And you probably fucked that up too.

But setting that aside, it's not an investment. It's a government driven agenda. Again... if it were competitive the market would have done it long ago. Maybe learn something about incremental economic analysis to compare the viability of different projects. And stop being so cunty.

 

[mamooth]

Honey, I've run economics on 500 million dollar projects. Anyone who tries to downplay the significance of a trillion dollar investment - let alone a 76 trillion dollar investment -

Awwwwww.

It's okay that you're not smart. I'm sure that you're a nice boy, and good looking too.

 

[ding]

Awwwwww.

It's okay that you're not smart. I'm sure that you're a nice boy, and good looking too.

You are so dumb, you didn't even notice I just pulled your bloomers down and made you my *****.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So about 3% of the global economy.

That's what has the deniers hysterical.

And that's just investment. Investments have a cash return.

Yes, deniers don't do economics.

And that's just investment. Investments have a cash return.

After we waste $3 trillion per year on less reliable, more expensive energy, when do we get any cash return?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What was our ROI on the Green New Deal Inflation Reduction Act?

It's a negative number, right?

 

[EMH]

Says the guy who doesn't understand the meaning of "3%" or "Investment".

A commonality among deniers is that they're dumber than dogshit across a broad array of topics. Their stupid is well-rounded.

Some can even answer basic climate questions that you cannot...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[mamooth]

Some can even answer basic climate questions that you cannot...

I've answered them all. Others have as well. You know that. You're just a pathological liar and coward.

Here, I'll answer them again.

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?

Because one pole has a continent, the other a mostly landlocked ocean.

What does that have to do with the current global warming? We keep asking, you keep running.

2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?

Because northern Alaska gets limited precipitation. That means the snow melts out every year, so glaciers don't build up. Greenland gets a lot more precipitation.

What does that have to do with global warming? We keep asking, you keep running.

3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?

It's not. You're just making stupid crap up.

Why do you make stupid crap up? Did you think nobody would notice?

4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?

First, the question makes no sense. The ocean rising doesn't make land sink.

Second, we have zillions of photos of land sinking.

Why did you ask such a dishonest question?

5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

It didn't. Greenland was already frozen, and didn't unfreeze. You're making up more nonsense.

There. Answered. You can run again now, and come back later claiming nobody answered your questions. Just remember that liars roast in Hell, and unless you publicly repent of your sins, you're headed for a toasty afterlife.

 

[EMH]

Because one pole has a continent, the other a mostly landlocked ocean.

What does that have to do with the current global warming? We keep asking, you keep running.

No the question is WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH CO2, and the answer is NOTHING.

EARTH ICE has NOTHING TO DO WITH Co2, thanks for VALIDATING THAT....

Because northern Alaska gets limited precipitation. That means the snow melts out every year, so glaciers don't build up. Greenland gets a lot more precipitation.

LIE

Alaska precipitation

Western Regional Climate Center

Western Regional Climate Center, providing climate services, data, and research for 13 western states

wrcc.dri.edu

In the maritime zone a coastal mountain range coupled with plentiful moisture produces annual precipitation amounts up to 200 inches in the southeastern panhandle, and up to 150 inches along the northern coast of the Gulf of Alaska. Amounts decrease to near 60 inches on the southern side of the Alaska Range in the Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Island sections. Precipitation amounts decrease rapidly to the north, with an average of 12 inches in the continental zone and less than 6 inches in the arctic region.

Snowfall makes up a large portion of the total annual precipitation. For example, Yakutat averages 216 inches of snow annually and has a total annual precipitation (rain plus water equivalent of snow) of about 130 inches. Along the arctic slope, Barrow receives an average of 29 inches of snow annually and a total annual precipitation of slightly more than 4 inches. Total snow depths on the ground are controlled by the temperature of an area. Fortunately, most of the areas of heavy snow have relatively mild temperatures which prevent total depths from becoming excessive. Present-day snow removal equipment is able to keep highways and airports operational.

Precipitation extremes are of interest. With reference to total amounts (both rain and snow) and based on existing records, the greatest annual precipitation occurred at MacLeod Harbor on Montague Island in the Gulf of Alaska with 332.29 inches in 1976. This station also holds the record for monthly totals with 70.99 inches in November 1976.

The record maximum for 24 hours occurred on December 29, 1955, in the city of Cordova (North Gulf of Alaska coast) with a measured amount of 14.13 inches. Snowfall extremes are all credited to a station at Thompson Pass, which is on the highway north of Valdez. The record measurements are: season (1952-53) 974.5 inches; month (February 1953) 298 inches; and 24-hour (December 1955) 62 inches.



Greenland precipitation

Greenland Average Precipitation

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 526.22 mm in 2024 from 465.26 mm in 2023. This page includes a chart with historical data for Greenland Average Precipitation.

tradingeconomics.com

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 497.10 mm in 2022 from 493.07 mm in 2021. Precipitation in Greenland averaged 439.54 mm from 1901 until 2022, reaching an all time high of 535.30 mm in 1996 and a record low of 361.19 mm in 1985. source: Worldbank​

One millimeter is eqaul to 1/25.4 of an inch


So Greenland averages 20 inches, Alaska at its lowest gets 60, highest gets more than 300



LOW END MOSSAD LIAR BUSTED AGAIN... Alaska gets WAY MORE PRECIPITATION THAN GREENLAND

TRY AGAIN!!!

It's not.

Notice no link, because she is busted immediately lying again by the FACT that the 1940s are the worst decade for canes, 1890s second place...

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

we have zillions of photos of land sinking.

POST ONE PHOTO OF LAND SINKING BECAUSE OF "OCEAN RISE". - she would if she could, she can't...

It didn't.

LOL!!

The OP documents and links all of it here...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Typical, a blizzard of lies busted immediately by THE DATA....

 

[mamooth]

EARTH ICE has NOTHING TO DO WITH Co2, thanks for VALIDATING THAT....

"DERP! THIS ONE SINGLE FACTOR OF CLIMATE WASN'T CAUSED BY CO2, THEREFORE CO2 CAN'T AFFECT CLIMATE IN ANY WAY!"

Sweet Jeebus, you're stupid. You have no business annoying the grownups.

Alaska precipitation

Thanks for reinforcing what I just said. Northern Alaska gets much less precip than the southern Alaskan mountain ranges, where the glaciers are.

Precipitation amounts decrease rapidly to the north, with an average of 12 inches in the continental zone and less than 6 inches in the arctic region.


So Greenland averages 20 inches, Alaska at its lowest gets 60, highest gets more than 300

Let's repeat what you just posted there from your reference.

Precipitation amounts decrease rapidly to the north, with an average of 12 inches in the continental zone and less than 6 inches in the arctic region.

Cult boi, when you're trying to lie, don't debunk you own lies with your own source. Your ChinaMasters expect better from you.

Notice no link, because she is busted immediately lying again by the FACT that the 1940s are the worst decade for canes, 1890s second place...

AGW theory never said there would be more hurricanes, just that they'd be more powerful. And they are. I'm correct, you're wrong, keep on sucking it hard, loser.

POST ONE PHOTO OF LAND SINKING BECAUSE OF "OCEAN RISE". - she would if she could, she can't...

Sweet Jeebus, this one is dumb. It just can't grasp that rising oceans don't make land sink. They're two different things. A first-grader could grasp it, but EMH can't.

The OP documents and links all of it here...

Free advice: Linking to yourself being proven wrong about everthing in a previous thread is not the own that you think it is.

 

[EMH]

Northern Alaska gets much less precip than the southern Alaskan mountain ranges, where the glaciers are.

You were busted lying. Alaska gets much more precipitation than Greenland.

Greenland has 7% of Earth ice. Alaska just has ice on mountains and is way behind Ellesmere island in ice, because Greenland and Ellesmere are in ice age and Alaska is not. This is the difference, Kamala/Cheney loving Mossad liar...



Alaska - just ice on mountains, NOT an ICE AGE

Greenland - buried under ice = ICE AGE

What percent of Earth ice is on Alaska???

LOL!!!

Too small to publish

Greenland has 7%
Alaska has way under 0.3% because that is what Ellesmere has and Ellesmere is in 3rd place

 

[EMH]

when you're trying to lie,

Who is lying?

YOU ARE

THAT IS DATA FROM GREENLAND NOT ALASKA

you are one sorry assed science invalid

AGW theory never said there would be more hurricanes

Another Zionist Fascist mossad LIE...

Do Changes in Our Climate Mean More Hurricanes?

In recent years, the occurrence and severity of hurricanes both appear to have drastically increased. Scientists have since begun to make connections between climate change and the proliferation of hurricanes.

education.nationalgeographic.org

While some scientists believe there is enough evidence to say that climate change caused by human activities is the reason for the increase in the number and strength of recent hurricane seasons





and the Mossad, like everyone else, cannot show us one single photo of "ocean rise" because THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE because THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT because PLANET EARTH IS NOT WARMING...