Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Again, as this is an Internet message board..I am sorry for being fresh out of fucks to give.Thanks for sharing your opinion. Unfortunately, our editors could not find space for it in today's edition.
Feel free to share more of your opinions in the future.
(See Lisa558? The usual suspects can't help but be pissy!)
I have no clue what that particular nasty leftist said, since I put it on ignore long ago.Thanks for sharing your opinion. Unfortunately, our editors could not find space for it in today's edition.
Feel free to share more of your opinions in the future.
(See Lisa558? The usual suspects can't help but be pissy!)
That “reaction chart” on the right of the screen is cool - showing which 20 posters or so are most liked or otherwise recognized among the nearly 50,000 members, in any 7-day span.
Should not there be some sort of TEMPORARY protection for these posters while they remain at the top? (I, for example, am now in the #1 spot…..brag, brag, brag.) It seems it is wrong for a very biased mod - and let’s admit It; we have them - to come along and ban (even thread ban) one of the top posters out of 50,000.
So, my suggestion: any poster in the top 5 spots cannot be banned for the time they are there. Sort of like a “getting out of jail” free card. What so you?
That “reaction chart” on the right of the screen is cool - showing which 20 posters or so are most liked or otherwise recognized among the nearly 50,000 members, in any 7-day span.
Should not there be some sort of TEMPORARY protection for these posters while they remain at the top? (I, for example, am now in the #1 spot…..brag, brag, brag.) It seems it is wrong for a very biased mod - and let’s admit It; we have them - to come along and ban (even thread ban) one of the top posters out of 50,000.
So, my suggestion: any poster in the top 5 spots cannot be banned for the time they are there. Sort of like a “getting out of jail” free card. What so you?
Keep flaming.Again, as this is an Internet message board..I am sorry for being fresh out of fucks to give.
The OP is whiner. No, you deserve any special consideration. Play by the rules. It ain't that difficult.
Y-A-W-N. Tell the OP she's a coward for putting me on Ignore.Keep flaming.
Except in this instance, you’d be reporting the mod currently online to herself.
I report maudes all the time. lolol...
That is true. But you can see from this thread that some mods DO abuse their position to punish - mock, insult, censor, etc. - and they feel very free to do so. I don’t think that will change.I'm not sure I see the point of rewarding popular posters by giving them any kind of immunity should they engage in unacceptable behavior.
The real problem, here, that you apparently intend to address, is that we have at least two or three moderators who have no qualms at all about abusing their position to punish and censor those whose opinions they do not like; and the only way that this could be fixed is to remove those moderators from their positions.
His posts need to be deleted, along with that mod’s attacking post. They both violate Zone 1 rules.Keep flaming.
I've had two dozen trips to Disneyworld how many for yous?I don’t think that is necessary.
The top poster in a 7 day span already gets awarded with an all expenses paid trip to Disney World.
If you have not been notified, contact a Mod IMMEDIATELY
Sometimes they forget.
The Mod you contact may pretend he doesn’t know what you are talking about, but keep pestering him.
You EARNED that trip
Make sure you get it
These are not zone 1 appropriate.I've had two dozen trips to Disneyland how many for yous?
just be glad I'm not black.These are not zone 1 appropriate.
Not that it does any good. The corrupt ones twist the rules however they will, to use them against posters that they find disagreeable, but there appears to be no accountability at all for the moderators themselves.
Should not there be some sort of TEMPORARY protection for these posters while they remain at the top? (I, for example, am now in the #1 spot…..brag, brag, brag.)
And yeah, if you appear on that list...you need a life.
Can't say that I really have any problems with maudes, really. They don't bother me and I don't bother them.
There's only two of em, observably, who seem to be in it solely for the ability to administrate their own worldviews via the controls. And one of em's a noob anyway.
I'll make an exception as I just saw rightwinger on that list./thread.
Ironically, that particular mod falsely accused me, a week or two ago, of stalking and harassing another user; ironic since it is quite clear that that mod has been engaging in similar behavior toward me.
