progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 68,014
- 42,765
- 2,615
fear of death might change their minds,, or at least they die with the baby they are killing,,progressive hunter interesting that you “love” this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fear of death might change their minds,, or at least they die with the baby they are killing,,progressive hunter interesting that you “love” this.
nope,,It can be both.
It didn’t before Roe. Nice to know your really a bloody butcher at heart.fear of death might change their minds,, or at least they die with the baby they are killing,,
I have no sympathy for anyone that wants to kill a child,,It didn’t before Roe. Nice to know your really a bloody butcher at heart.
Doesn’t mean it can’t be both. If it isn’t part of my body then you should have no problem with my removing it so it can reside elsewhere.nope,,
that clump of cells is still a human at the first stages of development,,
Not really by law. If it is a human being, then it should be an immediate tax deduction.what is "IT" thats inside your body??
let me help you,,
"IT" is another human being,,
Of course not, you are a bloody butcher.I have no sympathy for anyone that wants to kill a child,,
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.I stand with you against that,,
now back to the topic at hand,,
did they force you to get prego??
if it doent kill it you are free to do as you please,,Doesn’t mean it can’t be both. If it isn’t part of my body then you should have no problem with my removing it so it can reside elsewhere.
LOL You are the one wanting to butcher babies.Of course not, you are a bloody butcher.
if she need an abortion the decision has already been made by her to have a child since she is already prego,,This fails as a false comparison fallacy.
Government isn’t ‘forcing’ anyone to be vaccinated.
The topic is government violating a woman’s right to privacy by interfering with her decision whether to have a child or not, forcing a woman to have a child against her will.
Women who don’t wish to be pregnant will seek an abortion when a given birth control method fails.
fuck off troll,, you are ignored,,Not really by law. If it is a human being, then it should be an immediate tax deduction.
.
Justice Stevens addressed that question in Casey:I'm not a conservative,,
but what about the individual rights of the baby being killed??
I am honored that you put me on ignore. It shows you have no cogent argument.fuck off troll,, you are ignored,,
Correct.No one said it was. Point is, what is inside my body is a part of my body and unless you think women shouldn’t have the same rights and protections you enjoy, the decisions are between me and my doctor.
doesnt give her a right to kill another human beingCorrect.
A woman’s protected liberties are paramount, immune from attack by the state:
“It is an inescapable biological fact that state regulation with respect to the child a woman is carrying will have a far greater impact on the mother's liberty than on the father's. The effect of state regulation on a woman's protected liberty is doubly deserving of scrutiny in such a case, as the State has touched not only upon the private sphere of the family but upon the very bodily integrity of the pregnant woman.” Casey, supra
If pro-lifers provide living wages during late pregnancy; child care for working mothers; hospital costs for the uninsured; a program similar to SNAP; and to AFDC; and if they provide this as needed with no time limit, then I commend them.
However the government attitude is that those people are welfare queens and they would like to diminish those programs. At least Biden supports paid pregnancy leave.
.
Your right.I am hard-hearted about this myself. Why should the State/my employer have to take care of me when I am having a baby?
They don't.Does the State pay the non-working mother a stipend for "maternity leave"? Why does Government talk so many into the horrible idea they cannot take care of themselves, let alone a family?
Sure, let them starve.It is bad enough with "free lunch/breakfast" programs Government pushes the idea on children that their parents can't even take care of them; it is so much worse when Government then pushes the idea on adults they cannot take care of themselves.
So, you can provide your own water when your house catches fire?Shame on all of us. Our ancestors gave their lives that we might be free/independent--not dependent.
Yes, there is for people like you.If the Government thinks we need Government money to make it through, that is a pretty good indication we are being taxed too much. What would we think of a thief that took our money and then expected gratitude when they returned part of it? There is a better way.