A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

[jknowgood]

Biden who?

The incestuous pedophile you support.

 

[Mac1958]

No, it's a fact based on his own, public behaviors and words.

Very true, it's just observation, over and over and over.

The problem is, your average street Trumpster evidently behaves and communicates at Trump's level, so they don't know any better.

 

[mudwhistle]

Why am I not surprised they did not go as far as explaining what is necessary if a soldier decides to refuse what they believe to be an illegal order? Considering their stated former positions in the Services, they would, or at least should, know what those requirements are, and those requirements damn sure don't stop at simply refusing the order.

It states clearly in the UCMJ that we can disobey an immoral or illegal order.
This was spelled out to me in 1974.

These jerks are just trying to give the impression that Trump is breaking the law.
Fact is, Trump is finally enforcing the law.
They are the ones guilty of breaking the law.

 

[mudwhistle]

Very true, it's just observation, over and over and over.

The problem is, your average street Trumpster evidently behaves and communicates at Trump's level, so they don't know any better.

Yep. And you support the Hug a Thug Democrats....as if you really had some sort of high moral ground to postulate from.

 

[marvin martian]

We are eager to see what's in the files about Bill Clinton. Or did Biden's team erase that?

They had four years to do so, so probably yes.

And all four years, the Democrats and their supporters stayed silent about it.

They're ALL implicated in this. Every Biden supporter.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He is an analyst. Ha

Yes, the person in charge of scrubbing the files.

Next step: you work up the stones to answer the question in the OP

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

These jerks are just trying to give the impression that Trump is breaking the law.
Fact is, Trump is finally enforcing the law.

Oops, that's going to get your MAGA card pulled. Better post between 52 and 65 memes, as your penance.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Yes, the person in charge of scrubbing the files.

Next step: you work up the stones to answer the question in the OP

Schnitt wasn't in charge of scrubbing the files. You're lying. (As always). No where in his taped interview does he say he was the one scrubbing them.

 

[mudwhistle]

Oops, that's going to get your MAGA card pulled. Better post between 52 and 65 memes, as your penance.

Fck you.

We both know I'm right.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Schnitt wasn't in charge of scrubbing the files. You're lying. (As always). No where in his taped interview does he say he was the one scrubbing them.

View attachment 1185547

More likely the lying fat rapist and his lying toadies are the liars.

Now, back to the topic.

When your balls drop, are you going to answer the OP question?

 

[Nostra]

Democrats now openly calling for Sedition:

Holy cow!

They are definitely not hiding it.


Amazing.

 

[OODA_Loop]

More likely the lying fat rapist and his lying toadies are the liars.

Now, back to the topic.

When your balls drop, are you going to answer the OP question?

I don't believe files should redacted for anything but comprises to national security.

 

[mudwhistle]

Holy cow!

They are definitely not hiding it.


Amazing.

They're just trying to see how far they can go before somebody gets nailed.
Pushing the envelope so to speak.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't believe files should redacted for anything but comprises to national security.

Great.

 

[hadit]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

No, there would be nothing fine about that at all. It is clear, however, that the nay-sayers have been establishing the narrative that the files were altered to allow them to continue whining about said files should Orange Man not be in there sufficiently to provoke much-longed-for outrage.

 

[g5000]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

If we see all the PedoFiles before the mid-terms, I will be amazed.

Trump's FBI raided his best friend's NYC apartment a year and a half before Trump left office. They found a network of surveillance cameras all through the place, including in the bedrooms.

The FBI confiscated THOUSANDS of images and videos.

Where are those images and videos? What did Trump's FBI do with them? Will Trump's FBI ever release them?

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, there would be nothing fine about that at all. It is clear, however, that the nay-sayers have been establishing the narrative that the files were altered to allow them to continue whining about said files should Orange Man not be in there sufficiently to provoke much-longed-for outrage.

But we know that's irrelevant, since he is indeed in there thousands of times.