A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

[hadit]

But we know that's irrelevant, since he is indeed in there thousands of times.

"We know"? Then why bother releasing anything if you already have what you want?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"We know"? Then why bother releasing anything if you already have what you want?

Maybe find a quiet spot and see if you can puzzle that out for yourself. Good luck.

 

[hadit]

Maybe find a quiet spot and see if you can puzzle that out for yourself. Good luck.

Oh, I'm well aware that perpetual outrage is the desired outcome.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Yeah, I'm used to it. I even included it in the OP.

Their non-answers, deflection and personal attacks are answers in their own way.

(But we're not supposed to notice that)

Oh you poor little victim lol.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[MarathonMike]

But we know that's irrelevant, since he is indeed in there thousands of times.

"We know"? Who is "we"? You and the mouse in your pocket?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh, I'm well aware that perpetual outrage is the desired outcome.

Oh, so you were sealioning and had already invented an answer out of thin air that suits your MAGA fetishes and neuroses.

This is my shocked face:

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We know"? Who is "we

Anyone with even the slightest attachment to reality.

Are you trying to say we don't know his name is in there?

Have you been smoking crack?

 

[hadit]

Oh, so you were sealioning and had already invented an answer out of thin air that suits your MAGA fetishes and neuroses.

This is my shocked face:

How sad will you be if he's not really in there?

 

[DonGlock26]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

Mac must be trying to get in front of a lot of Democrats being involved with Epstein.

 

[Bitterhook]

It states clearly in the UCMJ that we can disobey an immoral or illegal order.
This was spelled out to me in 1974.

These jerks are just trying to give the impression that Trump is breaking the law.
Fact is, Trump is finally enforcing the law.
They are the ones guilty of breaking the law.

Well, it is strictly theater, because to refuse to obey a direct order on the grounds you believe it is illegal or immoral, still requires the soldier surrenders themself to command, and starts a process of adjudication. Primarily because if the soldier is correct in their refusal, then whomever gave them the order is in trouble and facing consequences.

And as you mentioned, you were made fully aware of the fact you could refuse the order, probably as well as the same way you were made fully aware of what the oath you were taking meant.

In light of those realities, the people in the video were not talking to the troops but grandstanding while acting like they were. Or they think the troops they could be talking to are too stupid to know the difference. It wouldn't be the first time a Democrat assumed those that may support them could be idiots.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How sad will you be if he's not really in there?

You mean, if we turn back the clock 30 years, delete his friendship with Epstein, so that Trump's name wouldn't appear 1000s of times in the files we already have?

I wouldn't be sad. I would be impressed and would suggest a Nobel in Physics.

 

[hadit]

You mean, if we turn back the clock 30 years, delete his friendship with Epstein, so that Trump's name wouldn't appear 1000s of times in the files we already have?

I wouldn't be sad. I would be impressed and would suggest a Nobel in Physics.

I'll be awaiting my nomination.

See, it matters HOW his name is in there. If he never, for example, went to the island and never, for example, is listed as having abused anyone, the leftist narrative that OH, NO, he KNEW stuff takes over.

Of course, none of that matters to the average hate monger. As we have seen, they tried to make hay out of an email that contradicted sworn testimony, as if it was significant.

 

[mudwhistle]

If we see all the PedoFiles before the mid-terms, I will be amazed.

Trump's FBI raided his best friend's NYC apartment a year and a half before Trump left office. They found a network of surveillance cameras all through the place, including in the bedrooms.

The FBI confiscated THOUSANDS of images and videos.

Where are those images and videos? What did Trump's FBI do with them? Will Trump's FBI ever release them?

.

Trump never had an FBI.

The FBI was clearly controlled by the Deep State, shitforbrains.

 

[mudwhistle]

You mean, if we turn back the clock 30 years, delete his friendship with Epstein, so that Trump's name wouldn't appear 1000s of times in the files we already have?

I wouldn't be sad. I would be impressed and would suggest a Nobel in Physics.

Obama wasn't Epstein's friend.

Why did his name appear over 400 times in his emails?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

See, it matters HOW his name is in there.

Of course it does!

Like, "Trump won't be my friend anymore, because he heard I diddle kids and said he might go to the cops."

Instead of

"Of course Trump knew (and did not report it to the police). That's why he asked Ghislaine to stop."

Eek.

That's a fking sitting president. Top law enforcement agent in the country.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Obama wasn't Epstein's friend.

Why did his name appear over 400 times in his emails?

What am I, your mommy? You tell us. Make your own big boy point in your own big boy words.

 

[g5000]

Trump never had an FBI.

The FBI was clearly controlled by the Deep State, shitforbrains.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[g5000]

What is the context of the censure?

When did this phone call take place? Before or after Epstein was arrested?

Before or after the whole world discovered Epstein's crimes?

Should someone be censured for having a relationship with Epstein like so many dozens of other important people did, like Steve Bannon who stayed at Epstein's house which was plastered with sexual objects?

Let's hear some context.