A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

[mudwhistle]

 

[g5000]

This is just more of Trump's vindictive attacks against everyone who ever held him accountable for his crimes.

Stacey Plackett was the House impeachment manager after Trump's attempted coup.

That's what this is.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is just more of Trump's vindictive attacks against everyone who ever held him accountable for his crimes.

Stacey Plackett was the House impeachment manager after Trump's attempted coup.

That's what this is.

.

Indeed.

 

[mudwhistle]

What is the context of the censure?

When did this phone call take place? Before or after Epstein was arrested?

Before or after the whole world discovered Epstein's crimes?

Should someone be censured for having a relationship with Epstein like so many dozens of other important people did, like Steve Bannon who stayed at Epstein's house which was plastered with sexual objects?

Let's hear some context.

The context is that she was in a public hearing and was exchanging personal text messages from Jeffery Epstein. The content of the texts were intended to ask questions designed to trash Trump.

These cretins think out of 60,000 documents Trumps name was mentioned 1600 times, Jeffery Epstein was mentioned 1000 times, Barack Obama was mentioned 400 times, Bill Clinton was mentioned 200 times, Larry Summers was mentioned 200 times, and Michael Wolff was mentioned 200 times....but Trump is the only person who they want to assume any guilt over it.
And the mentioning in files is more damning than a House Representative exchanging personal text messages with Jeffery Fcking Epstein during the Cohen hearing in Feb of 2019.



Come on...give me a fcking break.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Mac is a coward

I think Mac may have me on ignore.


Vrenn - 2023
MAC1958 - 2025

!!

 

[Nostra]

I think Mac may have me on ignore.


Vrenn - 2023
MAC1958 - 2025

!!

He has anyone who isn’t programmed exactly like him on ignore. Seems very fragile.

 

[mudwhistle]

What am I, your mommy? You tell us. Make your own big boy point in your own big boy words.

I don't have to. You pretty much made it for me.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't have to. You pretty much made it for me.

Of course that didn't happen.

Son, your cheese has slid off of your cracker.

 

[Seymour Flops]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

I woukdn't mind a bit. But not exactly for the reaon you give.

Trump will never be able to fight them as dirty as they fought him. But it is good for him to do as much as he can.

 

[Mac-7]

Mac1958

Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

No, that would not be acceptable even for the sake of saving America from people like you

I will regret an end to the crackdown on illegal aliens that invaded our country under biden

And that is merely one issue that libs do not want to fix

Now my question, which you will not answer because you have me on ignore

Yes the great compromiser refuses to compromise with people he does not approve of

My question:

Do you consider MAGAs such a threat to the lib agenda that you privately support distorting the facts to put him in a bad light?

Could you accept lying about trump for a good cause?

 

[mudwhistle]

This is just more of Trump's vindictive attacks against everyone who ever held him accountable for his crimes.

Stacey Plackett was the House impeachment manager after Trump's attempted coup.

That's what this is.

.

Yeah.....and she was texting with Epstein on how to **** over Trump.

You can tell that this is causing a panic.....because when one of them goes down the rest of the dominoes are going to start falling.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Blisterfinger]

I think Mac may have me on ignore.


Vrenn - 2023
MAC1958 - 2025

!!

Well it is a cowards move to ignore those that you cannot argue with.

 

[g5000]

Yeah.....and she was texting with Epstein on how to **** over Trump.

Link?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Well it is a cowards move to ignore those that you cannot argue with.

Im not calling anyone names, thats not my thing, but even when I provide a post that he should agree with, he is silent. I figured in a post where he was looking for honest answers, he would have at least acknowledged it

 

[AntonToo]

Can liberals explain why the Epstein files became important to them only when TDS was re-elected POTUS?

...you seriously don't understand why Democrats love watching Trump acting guilty while driving MAGA mad?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you consider MAGAs such a threat to the lib agenda that you privately support distorting the facts to put him in a bad light?

Like you do here, every single day?

Oh the irony

 

[mudwhistle]

Link?

It's been all over the news.
It's been all over X.
Go look it up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Link?

Remember, someone making a threat to tell the truth to criminal investigators is the worst kind of person.

That's where MAGA morality and ethics are, these days.

 

[g5000]

It's been all over the news.
It's been all over X.
Go look it up.

Argument from ignorance.

Link?