A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It could also have meant death or destitution. THINK!

TDS? Lol. Again with that old canard. Do you MAGAs ever tire of that ignorance?

.

It's real.

Psychotherapist says 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is real pathology, plaguing 75 percent of his patients

Psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert described Trump Derangement Syndrome as a profound pathology causing sleepless nights, compulsive news checking and emotional distress in his patients.

www.foxnews.com

Make Asylums Great Again



.

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm sure you have talked about Obama 400 times, too. You also think Obama is an asshole.

Does this mean you are a pedophile?

.

No......but it doesn't exclude Obama from being one. You see proper context is very important, but you Deep Staters seem to think it doesn't matter a bit when you're trying to destroy someone's reputation thru yet another smear campaign.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump was a Democrat too! Why leave him out?

Trump was a Democrat.....and chose to leave because he saw the direction they were going and didn't want any part of it.
Ronald Reagan was the same way.

Strange how some of our best leaders left the Democratic Party. You see they don't believe in all of the nonsense you support.
They also don't think that human-trafficking new voters into the US is legal.

 

[sparky]

I would rather see the materials released to an independent, bipartisan panel

really?

live the 9/11 or warren commish....???

~S~

 

[CrusaderFrank]

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

 

[Mac1958]

View attachment 1185716

Wouldn't be a surprise, that's for sure.

Nail him. Make an example out of him.

And?

 

[konradv]

View attachment 1185716

Trump is below the waist.

 

[kyzr]

If there was anything on Trump in the Epstein files Biden would have released them already. /thread.

 

[JoeB131]

That situation assumes that Biden's admin had access to the same material, and didn't even leak anything that would be detrimental to Trump for 4 years, even after he won the Republican Nomination and Harris' campaign was showing signs of flailing.

Anything detrimental to Trump would have already been leaked in October of 2024 at the latest.

Why would he do that? The ugly truth is "Ex-Presidents" is a pretty exclusive club. It's why Obama didn't put Bush on trial for war crimes, it's why Bush didn't prosecute Clinton for his many scandals, and it's why Clinton didn't go after Poppy Bush and Reagan for their Iran-Contra crimes.

True, Biden did prosecute Trump for the truly blatant stuff like January 6th and stealing boxloads of secret documents, but only after dragging his feet for years on them.

And I honestly doubt Biden was terribly interested in helping Harris all that much, given she helped stab him in the back.

 

[martybegan]

Why would he do that? The ugly truth is "Ex-Presidents" is a pretty exclusive club. It's why Obama didn't put Bush on trial for war crimes, it's why Bush didn't prosecute Clinton for his many scandals, and it's why Clinton didn't go after Poppy Bush and Reagan for their Iran-Contra crimes.

True, Biden did prosecute Trump for the truly blatant stuff like January 6th and stealing boxloads of secret documents, but only after dragging his feet for years on them.

And I honestly doubt Biden was terribly interested in helping Harris all that much, given she helped stab him in the back.

Nope, everything went out the window when it comes to getting Trump. It would have been leaked, and then leaked some more.

 

[leftwinger]

So people actually can go to jail for "lying to Congress" ?

But the Clintons can avoid any risk of jail simply br refusing to show up?

Uh...got it. Eric Holder round 2.
They were due in early OCT. 2025.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If there was anything on Trump in the Epstein files Biden would have released them already. /thread.

.

How many times do we have to make this point before a left cultist is going to understand it?

.

 

[sparky]

So, since the Schumer shutdown backfired (he's lost a lot of his constituency) the D's have devolved into political theater as diversion.......

It's easy to see how this'll end up......

~S~

 

[konradv]

If there was anything on Trump in the Epstein files Biden would have released them already. /thread.

That’s not the way it worked in normal administrations. That was Merrick Garland’s call. MAGA snitches on itself, because they’re saying “that’s what we would do”. The AG is supposed to be independent, not the attack dog of the president.

 

[konradv]

So people actually can go to jail for "lying to Congress" ?

But the Clintons can avoid any risk of jail simply br refusing to show up?

Uh...got it. Eric Holder round 2.
They were due in early OCT. 2025.

Bill is off the hook. SCOTUS said so.

 

[gipper]

If there was anything on Trump in the Epstein files Biden would have released them already. /thread.

Not this dumb conclusion again. Lol. Really?

Do you not know many high level Ds were involved with Epstein, including Bubba. Would it surprise anyone if it was exposed both O and Genocide Joe were involved with Epstein?

THINK! Stop posting right wing narratives you learned on Fox News.

 

[Care4all]

View attachment 1185716

As said before, she's not a flatter chest child...no island for her!

Try again!

 

[Care4all]

Bingo! Those in the know can easily see that this Epstein BS is just a distraction to keep stupid people distracted by something taboo, like during Cosby. This is stuff cooked up by the DNC to keep people discussing anything but how nefarious the democrap party is. Most people actually believe all the political theater shown in the MSM and never once ask what is happening behind the curtain. The MSM and alcohol and or Meth is all that is needed to keep the people divided and distracted so that the government can do whatever the lobbyists and Big Donors want without resistance.

Yet you don't see that it was Trump's bizarre and Bat shit crazy responses on the Epstein files being released... with his administration... cover, is what CAUSED the commotion on the right against Trump on it, with also pulling the Democrats in on the frenzy?

I think you are missing a big part and root, to why The Epstein files became a distraction....TRUMP made it one.

 

[Nostra]

That’s not the way it worked in normal administrations. That was Merrick Garland’s call. MAGA snitches on itself, because they’re saying “that’s what we would do”. The AG is supposed to be independent, not the attack dog of the president.

So why are you asking Trumo to release them?

Hypocrisy noted.

 

[konradv]

So why are you asking Trumo to release them?

Hypocrisy noted.

He promised and so did Bondi. It isn’t just me. MAGA wants answers.