A question for MAGA re: Epstein materials

They keep saying pedophile 24-7 for anyone in the Epstein orbit.

But reading here that label does not even apply? Teenage years are not classified in that manner.

You dumb dirty lying Board Stain maggots. An embarrassment to be on my planet.//
Have you ever tried to control a 17-year-old? LOL
 
So you are implicitly saying Trump is a pedo.

Thanks for admission dummy.
G2QpgKCXwAAJrCQ.webp
 
No they are not and you know it.

Taking advantage of a 17+ year old who wants to trade sex for a modeling introduction is wrong but doesn't come close to molesting an 8 year old.

That you equate the two is bizarre.
THey are making light of pedophilia. It's freaking sick. Anyone that uses the term is a partisan asshole
 
NO HE DIDN'T. Admin released a bunch of useless rehash bs, called the case closed and accused Republicans who weren't satisfied as dis-loyal to Trump.

And the very reason for need for Congress to force this disclosure was...TRUMP REFUSING TO DO IT HIMSELF.

When are you going to take a break from posting constant asstruth already?
He released a bunch of stuff that was never released by the prior admin

Face it, you got nothing

Everything that’s been released shows your party is all over this and all buddy buddy with Epstein
 
No they are not and you know it.

Taking advantage of a 17+ year old who wants to trade sex for a modeling introduction is wrong but doesn't come close to molesting an 8 year old.

That you equate the two is bizarre.

Dummy Epstein never molested 8 year olds either, I guess you are down to defending him too.

How about this - Trump was as much of a pedo as Epstein. That sounds better to you? :slap:
 
NO HE DIDN'T. Admin released a bunch of useless rehash bs, called the case closed and accused Republicans who weren't satisfied as dis-loyal to Trump.

And the very reason for need for Congress to force this disclosure was...TRUMP REFUSING TO DO IT HIMSELF.

When are you going to take a break from posting constant asstruth already?
Because it’s not normal for the executive to release entire case files in criminal cases to the public. Normally we want to protect innocent people and victims…the dems have given Trump complete cover in releasing all this now

It’s also not normal for members of congress to be texting convicted sex offenders in the middle of hearings…but maybe it is for Dems
 
Because it’s not normal for the executive to release entire case files in criminal cases to the public.

Asstruth, Trump obviously doesn't give a shit about normal, which is why he promised the release during his campaign.

His refusal was not based on any sound reasons like legal and departmental prudency or deference to the victims. NOPE. he called the matter itself "fake" and people who were unsatisfied, including his own base as disloyal fools.
 
It’s also not normal for members of congress to be texting convicted sex offenders in the middle of hearings…but maybe it is for Dems
She probably thought a professional sex offender would have good advice about writing laws to protect sex offenders.

A lawyer with a history of protecting sex offenders would be better for that purpose. Like many of Biden's judicial nominees, for example.

A man who is BOTH a lawyer and a sex offender would be ideal, I guess. Bill Clinton or Joe Biden.
 
Some questions down below :

1. FBI and DOJ work for Trump, for political parties, for MAGA, or for America?
2. Their primary obligation is to serve the interests of the American public and uphold the Constitution, rather than any political party or individual, including Trump, right?
3. And their goal is to maintain law and order and protect democratic principles, serving all Americans rather than specific political interests or ideologies, right?

Just simple questions. :)
 
Don't care what they redact or don't.

I don't care if they implicate Trump...unless there is super unchallengable evidence (and e-mails can easily be manufactured in today's day and age.

I don't care if they implicated Joe Biden, whom I loathe.

I don't care if they implicate Ted Kennedy, whom I borderline hate.

I won't believe any of it. I don't trust that we are going to get anything that hasn't been doctored by one side or the other.
You do know he's dead, right? :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Very true, it's just observation, over and over and over.

The problem is, your average street Trumpster evidently behaves and communicates at Trump's level, so they don't know any better.

Vi7e0AO.jpg
Well, since you are obviously poor, weak and stupid, you must think his shit doesn't stink!
 
Some questions down below :

1. FBI and DOJ work for Trump, for political parties, for MAGA, or for America?
2. Their primary obligation is to serve the interests of the American public and uphold the Constitution, rather than any political party or individual, including Trump, right?
3. And their goal is to maintain law and order and protect democratic principles, serving all Americans rather than specific political interests or ideologies, right?

Just simple questions. :)
Unfortunately that all changed when Obama became president. These agencies now work for the president. We are trying to fix that however.
 
15th post
Everyone knows about his slimy side already. Do you have brain damage? Chappaquiddick ring a bell?
Chappaquiddick got me started detesting his sorry ass. I was a little kid who followed this stuff and he simply was a slime wad then.

No....Ted Kennedy was the "Lion of the Senate". I call him the "Liar of the Senate". He was lauded at length when he passed......so, even if they know, they don't seem to let it bother them.

I'd love to dig up his sorry carcass, shoot it and leave what's left of the buzzards if he was implicated and I trusted it.

Why don't you cut with the brain damage comments. You are not lecturing your grandkids.
 
At this point, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Larry Summers and Prince Harry are the most prominent "friends" of Epstein. I really have to ask why you are not even remotely interested in nailing them? This is a simple yes or no question: Should Clinton be dragged through a big formal investigation and made an example of? Yes or no? Why not Bill Gates? His wife divorced him because of his ties with Epstein. Funny how for well over a year the democraps are foaming at the mouth at the really unlikely possibility of "Getting Trump!!!" but not one has said let's start with Bill Clinton and hope that it opens a large can of worms and the shit hits the fan. The truth is you neo-leftists really don't care about pedophilia because you are the alphabet party and support every form of sexual deviation known to man, including necrophilia, so the only explanation for your behavior is you all just have Stage 4 TDS.
Andrew, not Harry!
 
Umm no, because not even once did Trump actually show anyone to be corrupt.

Some sort of petty mortgage fraud is not abuse of office, which is what corruption is.
Mortgage fraud is criminal behavior, dork.
My guess is with every one of those people, mortgage fraud is the least of their crimes.
 
Back
Top Bottom