So the Mormons aren't the only ones to dodge these questions...
Is this more what you had in mind as a response to your opening post?
"Son of God" was used in the Old Testament to describe people who had any special relationship with God. For example, kings and leaders who were seen to have received authority from God were called, "Sons of God." But as time went on, it began to be used to describe the Messiah, the elect of God.
Christos, or Christ, has that same connotation, the elect or anointed of God, and this is how the New Testament references Jesus. But there is more. At Jesus' baptism, a voice was heard, "This is my beloved son..." The Gospel of John tells us that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was made flesh. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jesus was fully human. He is fully divine. He is one in being with the Father.
Jesus did die on the cross. He descended to the dead, and the same body that suffered death was resurrected. He ascended body and soul into heaven.
Heaven is described as more than a place, it is also described as a state of being with God.
People are not judged on how much knowledge they have, or how 'right' they are, but on the greatness of their love and righteousness. Knowledge is beneficial only when it moves us closer to understanding God. Since God's ways are far above human ways, the people who understand God most correctly are probably a foot closer to God than everyone else--in other words, probably not enough to matter greatly as there is still a magnitude left to know and understand. In addition, Scripture tells us that the people who probably know and understand God best are those the world regards as fools.
It is belief, faith, knowledge
without love that puts people in a tenuous position.