A Nice Explanation of Why "Evolution" is Nonsense

Then it's probably not a scientific theory.
Not true at all. Theories can be facts.

True things are facts.

Some theories are true.

Therefore, some theories are facts.
 
Last edited:
As you know I disagree with this concept.

Life is built in to the basic physics of the universe. There is life at 0 degrees Kelvin.
But then anything and everything is life.

Okay, I dont hate the idea, but sometimes ya gotta draw a line in the sand for the sake of academic pursuit.
 
You entirely miss my point which is that you should be able to question ANYTHING in science and not fear your job and reputation by doing so.

Or do you not agree?
Doubting is not questioning.

Doubting is not skepticism.

Making contrarian claims is not questioning.

The OP isnt questioning evolutionary theory. He is peddling false claims about it.

All of science is only that: questioning.
 
Last edited:
It has been demonstrated that a cell needs all it's parts, as is, for the cell to function and an in between state won't function, so it can't evolve.
No, that's a lie.

And it's the dusty, old, throughly debunked fallacy of irreducible complexity.
 
Not true at all. Theories can be facts.

True things are facts.

Some theories are true.

Therefore, some theories are facts.

Truth remains the same and never changes, EVER.

Evolution is continual change..matter, time, and space.

The second you make a "truth" statement, you have just destroyed the evolution theory.

:oops8:
 
Truth remains the same and never changes, EVER.

Evolution is continual change..matter, time, and space.
(Therefore evolution cannot be true)

Well there is the dumbest thing anyone will read today. Mind numbingly stupid.

Oh look, plate tectonics inolves the plates always changing position. Therefore the theory is false! 🤣

The weather always changes! Therefore theories of how clouds form are false!

So dumb.
 
Definitely! If it makes him happy, I am happy for him.

But if he wants to toss his steaming pile of shit out on the table, then it is also everyone else's right to mock it.
That's fine. Mock away.

I may not agree with his steaming pile of shit, but I'll defend to the death his right to toss it out on the table! :D
 
Last edited:
That's fine. Mock away.

I may not agree with his steaming pile of shit, but I'll defend to the death his right to toss it out of the table! :D
Well, same!

People have every right to fail a 7th grade science quiz, at their leisure.
 
(Therefore evolution cannot be true)

Well there is the dumbest thing anyone will read today. Mind numbingly stupid.

Oh look, plate tectonics inolves the plates always changing position. Therefore the theory is false! 🤣

The weather always changes! Therefore theories of how clouds form are false!

So dumb.

Yes, the evolution theory is dumb. I agree.
 
More failed theories from you.

:oops8:
Haha, except it is taught as fact globally and has more published science than any other theory.

In other words, the most robust and successful theory in history.

I notice your iron age, magical nonsense is trending in the opposite direction. 😭
 
Haha, except it is taught as fact globally and has more published science than any other theory.

In other words, the most robust and successful theory in history.

I notice your iron age, magical nonsense is trending in the opposite direction. 😭

Teaching religion as fact?

No way.

:laugh:
 
15th post
Go for it.
The problem is there is no objective standard.

Let's say you have a piece of data, and one person says "yep, that proves God exists" and another person says "no way, I prayed every day and got cancer anyway".

In science, two people can agree on the data and still disagree on what it means.

The Bayesian approach makes the most sense since it is subjective and unique to an individual. However it still depends on what the person is willing to accept as evidence.
 
The problem is there is no objective standard.

Let's say you have a piece of data, and one person says "yep, that proves God exists" and another person says "no way, I prayed every day and got cancer anyway".

In science, two people can agree on the data and still disagree on what it means.

The Bayesian approach makes the most sense since it is subjective and unique to an individual. However it still depends on what the person is willing to accept as evidence.
Pass around and algebra book to 10,000 people, and you get one interpretation.

Pass around a Bible to 10,000 people, and you get 10,000 interpretations.
 
Yes, the evolution theory is dumb. I agree.
Effects of pesticide selection
Repeated use of the same class of pesticides to control a pest can cause undesirable changes in the gene pool of a pest leading to another form of artificial selection, pesticide resistance. When a pesticide is first used, a small proportion of the pest population may survive exposure to the material due to their distinct genetic makeup. These individuals pass along the genes for resistance to the next generation. Subsequent uses of the pesticide increase the proportion of less-susceptible individuals in the population. Through this process of selection, the population gradually develops resistance to the pesticide. Worldwide, more than 500 species of insects, mites, and spiders have developed some level of pesticide resistance. The twospotted spider mite is a pest of most fruit crops and is notorious for rapidly developing resistance to miticides
 
Pass around and algebra book to 10,000 people, and you get one interpretation.

Pass around a Bible to 10,000 people, and you get 10,000 interpretations.
But certain interpretations have evolved into a more dominant role
 
Back
Top Bottom