‘A Moral, Ethical, Legal, Constitutional Travesty’

[pknopp]

.

As long as they get it your way.



.

If you want to reply to me, please have something to actually say.

 

[pknopp]

And, here we get a rare glimpse into how progressive liberals "debate" their hatred for Trump....As the article says, two liberal lawyers, that are "ardent opponents of Trump".... No, opposing opinion, at least in the conclusions. Only at how they arrive at their conclusions....So, they start with the premise that Trump is wrong (the conclusion) then work to build the argument....

This is the bubble that progressive liberals live in...Sad.

It's kinda fair to start with the presumption that Trump is wrong.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If you want to reply to me, please have something to actually say.

.



Ditto.




.

 

[berg80]

Well, these are MAGA Christians™, not serious Christians.

For most of them religion is an insurance policy for the afterlife rather than being concerned about giving comfort to the living as jesus taught.

 

[berg80]

And, here we get a rare glimpse into how progressive liberals "debate" their hatred for Trump....As the article says, two liberal lawyers, that are "ardent opponents of Trump".... No, opposing opinion, at least in the conclusions. Only at how they arrive at their conclusions....So, they start with the premise that Trump is wrong (the conclusion) then work to build the argument....

This is the bubble that progressive liberals live in...Sad.

To hash out this debate, we’ve convened two experts — both liberals, and both ardent opponents of Trump’s political program — who sharply disagree about nationwide injunctions.

What a colossal POS you are.

 

[j-mac]

It's kinda fair to start with the presumption that Trump is wrong.

Only if you approach it terms of being totally sold out to the democrat narrative.

 

[j-mac]

To hash out this debate, we’ve convened two experts — both liberals, and both ardent opponents of Trump’s political program — who sharply disagree about nationwide injunctions.

What a colossal POS you are.

Thank you for proving my point...

If you really think that forming the conclusion then debating the road to get to the conclusion is really a debate, then there is more wrong with your process than just that.

 

[pknopp]

Only if you approach it terms of being totally sold out to the democrat narrative.

9-0, 7-2.

 

[j-mac]

9-0, 7-2.

And he's abiding by the orders...But I got one, that I know you will not like...

312-226 + popular vote + ALL swing states.

 

[pknopp]

And he's abiding by the orders...But I got one, that I know you will not like...

312-226 + popular vote + ALL swing states.

That one mattered none to me. I held the position that the country lost no matter which loser won.

 

[j-mac]

That one mattered none to me. I held the position that the country lost no matter which loser won.

Sure you did....

 

[martybegan]

If you can't get your way with the courts, you change the rules.

The world has seen it before.

District courts were setup for Districts, not for the entire country.

 

[martybegan]

Well, these are MAGA Christians™, not serious Christians.

And who appointed you the decider of that?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

If you can't get your way with the courts, you change the rules.

The world has seen it before.

Letitia James was unavailable for comment.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, these are MAGA Christians™, not serious Christians.

And who appointed you the decider of that?

Me. My opinion.

And if you don't like my opinion, tough shit.

 

[martybegan]

Me. My opinion.

And if you don't like my opinion, tough shit.

At least you know it's an opinion.

 

[berg80]

Thank you for proving my point...

If you really think that forming the conclusion then debating the road to get to the conclusion is really a debate, then there is more wrong with your process than just that.

Wow. Their completely opposite opinions on whether national injunctions are appropriate are available for you to read. But you let ignorance get in the way.

 

[berg80]

Letitia James was unavailable for comment.

Thread 'Those of you who are excited about the prospects of trump exacting revenge on L. James should read this.'

May 14, 2025

Abby Lowell eviscerates the government's non existent case.

Letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi from Abbe Lowell, lawyer for New York Attorney General Letitia James

A letter sent April 24, 2025 by Abbe Lowell, lawyer for New York Attorney General Letitia James, to U.S. Attorney Pam Bondi regarding a Trump administration official’s efforts to have James prosecuted for alleged mortgage fraud. Lowell argues that the allegations are baseless and that the push...

www.documentcloud.org

I am reminded of this gem from Don during one of his ongoing trials.

In a court filing just before 10 p.m. Friday, Senior Assistant Special Counsels Molly Gaston and Thomas Windom alerted the judge in Trump’s latest criminal case — U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan — to a combative post Trump sent earlier in the day.

“If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” Trump wrote in all caps Friday...

• berg80
• Replies: 33
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Thread 'Those of you who are excited about the prospects of trump exacting revenge on L. James should read this.'

May 14, 2025

Abby Lowell eviscerates the government's non existent case.

Letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi from Abbe Lowell, lawyer for New York Attorney General Letitia James

A letter sent April 24, 2025 by Abbe Lowell, lawyer for New York Attorney General Letitia James, to U.S. Attorney Pam Bondi regarding a Trump administration official’s efforts to have James prosecuted for alleged mortgage fraud. Lowell argues that the allegations are baseless and that the push...

www.documentcloud.org

I am reminded of this gem from Don during one of his ongoing trials.

In a court filing just before 10 p.m. Friday, Senior Assistant Special Counsels Molly Gaston and Thomas Windom alerted the judge in Trump’s latest criminal case — U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan — to a combative post Trump sent earlier in the day.

“If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” Trump wrote in all caps Friday...

• berg80
• Replies: 33
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

Payback is a *****.

 

[Lesh]

97 times out of a 100 the Supreme Court gets it right regardless of make up

Not sure if that’s accurate but Dobbs points out the effect of one bad decision