Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi, billy. This is an interesting article, but what I noticed most is how it points out everything that divides us. There's an implication here that a conservative wont get a 'fair deal' from a liberal, and vise versa. Or that Christians can't get a fair shake from non-Christians. The plaintive complaint that law schools don't employ enough conservative or Christian teachers begs the question, why not? For a party that claims to pride itself on doing for itself instead of waiting for someone else to change events, this whine belies that thought. Why is there a dire void of conservative professors? Or is that even true outside anecdotal blurbs? I respect Rasmussen. This placing of facts in columns is what they do. But the concentration on our divisions only creates a distrust that hurts us as a nation.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
Hi, billy. This is an interesting article, but what I noticed most is how it points out everything that divides us. There's an implication here that a conservative wont get a 'fair deal' from a liberal, and vise versa. Or that Christians can't get a fair shake from non-Christians. The plaintive complaint that law schools don't employ enough conservative or Christian teachers begs the question, why not? For a party that claims to pride itself on doing for itself instead of waiting for someone else to change events, this whine belies that thought. Why is there a dire void of conservative professors? Or is that even true outside anecdotal blurbs? I respect Rasmussen. This placing of facts in columns is what they do. But the concentration on our divisions only creates a distrust that hurts us as a nation.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
....so long as that 'wisdom' of the founding national agreement fits YOUR version. And I don't believe there are no fair deals. Again though, that depends on a personal definition of 'fair' and to whom. Eminent domain is an example of 'fairness'..to whom? Slavery was 'fair' to certain landowners so long as they could hold on to the idea that some humans are the 'sub' kind, and the loss of that service was 'fair' to whom, and 'unfair' to whom. I have a lot more memories of 'the good old days' than you, billy, and I mourn the losses. But there's no going back to that innocence, those days of blindness toward the variance between our words and our deeds as a nation. And the greatest loss of all is the loss of community. We are broken into ineffective little pieces, and seem to think that is a good thing. No wonder a pissant little bunch of thugs has us checking under our beds. And no wonder that threat is a major campaign feature. We are being eaten up piece by piece, just like weather's references to the 30s over there.Hi, billy. This is an interesting article, but what I noticed most is how it points out everything that divides us. There's an implication here that a conservative wont get a 'fair deal' from a liberal, and vise versa. Or that Christians can't get a fair shake from non-Christians. The plaintive complaint that law schools don't employ enough conservative or Christian teachers begs the question, why not? For a party that claims to pride itself on doing for itself instead of waiting for someone else to change events, this whine belies that thought. Why is there a dire void of conservative professors? Or is that even true outside anecdotal blurbs? I respect Rasmussen. This placing of facts in columns is what they do. But the concentration on our divisions only creates a distrust that hurts us as a nation.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
We are in reality thoroughly divided, and Kumbaya sentiments will not remedy the situation. There are no fair deals short of constitutionally viable law enforced by the Executive Branch (which is currently intentionally not enforcing it) nor as applied by a legal profession whose members overwhelmingly find the Constitution an impediment to its political ventures.
There will be no consensus prior to one side or the other gaining ideological primacy. So long as the rapidly created numbers of uneducated American people and invading foreigners opt for bread and circuses versus the wisdom of the founding national agreement, there will be no change that will not further divide us, and exacerbate our societal demise.
World War 3 started several years ago. It is not so much a war for land as it is about preserving/crushing Western Civilization. Islamists and leftists on one side, the rest of us on the other.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
....so long as that 'wisdom' of the founding national agreement fits YOUR version.Hi, billy. This is an interesting article, but what I noticed most is how it points out everything that divides us. There's an implication here that a conservative wont get a 'fair deal' from a liberal, and vise versa. Or that Christians can't get a fair shake from non-Christians. The plaintive complaint that law schools don't employ enough conservative or Christian teachers begs the question, why not? For a party that claims to pride itself on doing for itself instead of waiting for someone else to change events, this whine belies that thought. Why is there a dire void of conservative professors? Or is that even true outside anecdotal blurbs? I respect Rasmussen. This placing of facts in columns is what they do. But the concentration on our divisions only creates a distrust that hurts us as a nation.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
We are in reality thoroughly divided, and Kumbaya sentiments will not remedy the situation. There are no fair deals short of constitutionally viable law enforced by the Executive Branch (which is currently intentionally not enforcing it) nor as applied by a legal profession whose members overwhelmingly find the Constitution an impediment to its political ventures.
There will be no consensus prior to one side or the other gaining ideological primacy. So long as the rapidly created numbers of uneducated American people and invading foreigners opt for bread and circuses versus the wisdom of the founding national agreement, there will be no change that will not further divide us, and exacerbate our societal demise.
I have a lot more memories of 'the good old days' than you, billy
We are broken into ineffective little pieces, and seem to think that is a good thing.
No wonder a pissant little bunch of thugs has us checking under our beds.
(chortle)..None of the above!....so long as that 'wisdom' of the founding national agreement fits YOUR version.Hi, billy. This is an interesting article, but what I noticed most is how it points out everything that divides us. There's an implication here that a conservative wont get a 'fair deal' from a liberal, and vise versa. Or that Christians can't get a fair shake from non-Christians. The plaintive complaint that law schools don't employ enough conservative or Christian teachers begs the question, why not? For a party that claims to pride itself on doing for itself instead of waiting for someone else to change events, this whine belies that thought. Why is there a dire void of conservative professors? Or is that even true outside anecdotal blurbs? I respect Rasmussen. This placing of facts in columns is what they do. But the concentration on our divisions only creates a distrust that hurts us as a nation.- things are so fucked up in the United States.
Supreme Court Concern is Just Tip of the Iceberg for Conservatives
We are in reality thoroughly divided, and Kumbaya sentiments will not remedy the situation. There are no fair deals short of constitutionally viable law enforced by the Executive Branch (which is currently intentionally not enforcing it) nor as applied by a legal profession whose members overwhelmingly find the Constitution an impediment to its political ventures.
There will be no consensus prior to one side or the other gaining ideological primacy. So long as the rapidly created numbers of uneducated American people and invading foreigners opt for bread and circuses versus the wisdom of the founding national agreement, there will be no change that will not further divide us, and exacerbate our societal demise.
I use the Founders' version. Which do you use?
I have a lot more memories of 'the good old days' than you, billy
Who can say? It's not the years, but the mileage.
We are broken into ineffective little pieces, and seem to think that is a good thing.
Indeed. The Democrats have been very effective at breaking us into little categories.
How about we dissolve all "protected groups", which are unconstitutional anyway?
No wonder a pissant little bunch of thugs has us checking under our beds.
I don't spend time there myself, and the reason for the continued existence of pissants is that our current leadership class has in the main all the solidity of a rain-soaked biscuit.
