Do you honestly think I care who calls whom a traitor on TV? I don’t play team sports. I care whether the accusation has any logical or legal basis. Treason is a specific charge, not a buzzword for cable hosts or angry forum posts. If Maddow or Tucker throws it around, it means nothing in a courtroom.
So the idea that Brennan, or anyone else, is about to be charged with treason because talking heads used the word is just flat-out delusional.
For reference, the Trump DOJ already tried to go after McCabe. Not for treason, mind you, they just wanted to punish a political enemy. When they couldn't get an indictment out of the Grand Jury, they refused to drop it until a judge told them: “charge him or drop it.” They dropped it. That’s what happens when fantasy collides with legal reality.
And here’s the real kicker, I haven’t seen a single coherent explanation of what you actually think Brennan did that would be chargeable. Vague vibes and Fox News segments don’t count.
As for Epstein: what plot are you even talking about? The reporting came from the Wall Street Journal. That’s Murdoch-owned. Same guy who owns FOX News. So the idea that this is some kind of Democratic hit job, when Democrats aren’t even in power, is incoherent.
This isn’t a courtroom. It's a message board. But even here, basic logic still applies.
