Grand Jury investigating Obama/Russia collusion may be impaneled in Florida due to the FBI raid on President Trump's home

This will be fun. We get to totally rehash all the previous stuff again! Maybe we can depose Don Jr. on his meeting with Russians. Nice!
As you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.

The Justice Department confirmed Sunday that President Donald Trump’s son Donald Jr. and former White House counsel Don McGahn were never called before a grand jury that heard witnesses called by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The disclosure was set in motion by Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., who ruled last week that Justice Department attorneys had deleted too much information from a court filing last month in an ongoing legal dispute over Attorney General William Barr’s refusal to share with House lawmakers grand jury-related information in Mueller’s final report.


Mueller declined to charge him when he broke campaign finance law by meeting Russian operatives offering dirt on Hillary he was told was in the possession of the Russian government. Why?

Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct​


This is the guy some in the POT want to put up as the next presidential candidate. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
As you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.

The Justice Department confirmed Sunday that President Donald Trump’s son Donald Jr. and former White House counsel Don McGahn were never called before a grand jury that heard witnesses called by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The disclosure was set in motion by Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., who ruled last week that Justice Department attorneys had deleted too much information from a court filing last month in an ongoing legal dispute over Attorney General William Barr’s refusal to share with House lawmakers grand jury-related information in Mueller’s final report.


Mueller declined to charge him when he broke campaign finance law by meeting Russian operatives offering dirt on Hillary he was told was in the possession of the Russian government. Why?

Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct​


This is the guy some in the the POT want to put up as the next presidential candidate. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
Muller was licking his chops to nail Trump snd Still Could Not Do It.
 
As you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.

The Justice Department confirmed Sunday that President Donald Trump’s son Donald Jr. and former White House counsel Don McGahn were never called before a grand jury that heard witnesses called by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The disclosure was set in motion by Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., who ruled last week that Justice Department attorneys had deleted too much information from a court filing last month in an ongoing legal dispute over Attorney General William Barr’s refusal to share with House lawmakers grand jury-related information in Mueller’s final report.


Mueller declined to charge him when he broke campaign finance law by meeting Russian operatives offering dirt on Hillary he was told was in the possession of the Russian government. Why?

Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct​


This is the guy some in the the POT want to put up as the next presidential candidate. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
Mueller declined to charge him since he didn’t find he broke a law
 
We'll see the evidence in court. In your world, stories in the Washington Post and on CNN are all the "evidence" you need.
Actually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.
 
Actually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.
An indictment isn’t evidence

Geez you dembots are dumb
 
Muller was licking his chops to nail Trump snd Still Could Not Do It.
His report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.

E. Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a ā€œcredible witnessā€ in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive actā€ if the firing ā€œwould naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€

Nexus (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that ā€œhis conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.ā€

Intent (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]ā€

 
Actually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.
So what happened with them. Did they go poof apple dumpling ???
 
Dems have no regard for law but do feel Republicans should be charged for not breaking one
True and it’s a stark difference between the DOJ not prosecuting someone cause they are simply senile

Like Hur
 
His report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.

E. Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a ā€œcredible witnessā€ in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive actā€ if the firing ā€œwould naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€

Nexus (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that ā€œhis conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.ā€

Intent (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]ā€

Weird cause Mueller testified he wasn’t obstructed, well before this

More proof that smith was acting illegally with his report
 
So what happened with them. Did they go poof apple dumpling ???
Did the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€ ā€œTaken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]ā€

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, ā€œthe existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.ā€

Intent (p. 97): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that Trump’s efforts were ā€œintended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.ā€


Mueller declined to prosecute due to the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez, cupcake.
 
Did the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€ ā€œTaken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]ā€

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, ā€œthe existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.ā€

Intent (p. 97): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that Trump’s efforts were ā€œintended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.ā€


Mueller declined to prosecute due to the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez, cupcake.
Mueller testified under oath he wasn’t obstructed

This is further proof that Jack Smith’s report, after he was illegally appointed, violated the law

 
Weird cause Mueller testified he wasn’t obstructed, well before this

More proof that smith was acting illegally with his report
Mueller proceeded correctly and legally which is why he will face no charges. Smith did the opposite.
Did the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€ ā€œTaken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]ā€

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, ā€œthe existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.ā€

Intent (p. 97): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that Trump’s efforts were ā€œintended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.ā€


Mueller declined to prosecute due to the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez, cupcake.
That is what you all construed to satisfy your defeat
 
15th post
His report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.

E. Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a ā€œcredible witnessā€ in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This ā€œwould qualify as an obstructive actā€ if the firing ā€œwould naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā€

Nexus (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidenceā€ indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that ā€œhis conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.ā€

Intent (p. 89): ā€œSubstantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]ā€

If he obtained so much solid evidence then why did he not conclude so yet you somehow feel so?
He well may be a non TDS afflictee
 
Hiding? What the **** does that mean?

What is it he is doing differently than he has for the last 8 years?

You have your imagination far ahead of facts.


Here is Obama responding to Trump admin's wild claims:

~~~~~~
Former President Obama and Hillary Clinton are reportedly maintaining a low profile as the Department of Justice initiates a grand jury investigation into allegations that they conspired to falsely link Donald Trump to Russia during the 2016 election. This investigation could lead to significant legal consequences for those involved.

Ex-Obama officials face federal grand jury probe into whether they promoted false Trump-Russia ties

 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom