It is in court. Itās not a trial, but itās in courtNot in court, a court trial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is in court. Itās not a trial, but itās in courtNot in court, a court trial.
He didnāt say it was a trial. He was responding to the idiot that claimed it wasnāt in court

Not in court, a court trial.
As you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.This will be fun. We get to totally rehash all the previous stuff again! Maybe we can depose Don Jr. on his meeting with Russians. Nice!

Muller was licking his chops to nail Trump snd Still Could Not Do It.As you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.
The Justice Department confirmed Sunday that President Donald Trumpās son Donald Jr. and former White House counsel Don McGahn were never called before a grand jury that heard witnesses called by special counsel Robert Mueller.
The disclosure was set in motion by Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., who ruled last week that Justice Department attorneys had deleted too much information from a court filing last month in an ongoing legal dispute over Attorney General William Barrās refusal to share with House lawmakers grand jury-related information in Muellerās final report.
Mueller declined to charge him when he broke campaign finance law by meeting Russian operatives offering dirt on Hillary he was told was in the possession of the Russian government. Why?
Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct
![]()
Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct
WASHINGTON ā I learned the hard way that predictions are perilous in the current age: I literally ate a column asserting that Republicans would never nominate Donald Trump for president.apnews.com
This is the guy some in the the POT want to put up as the next presidential candidate.![]()
![]()
Mueller declined to charge him since he didnāt find he broke a lawAs you may recall, Donnie J did not testify in front of the grand jury nor did he give sworn testimony to Mueller.
The Justice Department confirmed Sunday that President Donald Trumpās son Donald Jr. and former White House counsel Don McGahn were never called before a grand jury that heard witnesses called by special counsel Robert Mueller.
The disclosure was set in motion by Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., who ruled last week that Justice Department attorneys had deleted too much information from a court filing last month in an ongoing legal dispute over Attorney General William Barrās refusal to share with House lawmakers grand jury-related information in Muellerās final report.
Mueller declined to charge him when he broke campaign finance law by meeting Russian operatives offering dirt on Hillary he was told was in the possession of the Russian government. Why?
Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct
![]()
Too stupid to conspire, too incompetent to obstruct
WASHINGTON ā I learned the hard way that predictions are perilous in the current age: I literally ate a column asserting that Republicans would never nominate Donald Trump for president.apnews.com
This is the guy some in the the POT want to put up as the next presidential candidate.![]()
![]()
Actually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.We'll see the evidence in court. In your world, stories in the Washington Post and on CNN are all the "evidence" you need.
An indictment isnāt evidenceActually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.
Dems have no regard for law but do feel Republicans should be charged for not breaking oneMueller declined to charge him since he didnāt find he broke a law
His report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.Muller was licking his chops to nail Trump snd Still Could Not Do It.
So what happened with them. Did they go poof apple dumpling ???Actually, there is a huge amount of evidence implicating trump in multiple crimes contained in Jack Smith's indictments.
True and itās a stark difference between the DOJ not prosecuting someone cause they are simply senileDems have no regard for law but do feel Republicans should be charged for not breaking one
Weird cause Mueller testified he wasnāt obstructed, well before thisHis report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.
E. Efforts to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a ācredible witnessā in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This āwould qualify as an obstructive actā if the firing āwould naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā
Nexus (p. 89): āSubstantial evidenceā indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that āhis conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.ā
Intent (p. 89): āSubstantial evidence indicates that the Presidentās attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counselās oversight of investigations that involved the Presidentās conduct[.]ā
Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map
The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitterwww.lawfaremedia.org
Did the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?So what happened with them. Did they go poof apple dumpling ???
Mueller testified under oath he wasnāt obstructedDid the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?
F. Efforts to curtail Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 97): Trumpās effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference āwould qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā āTaken together, the Presidentās directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]ā
Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, āthe existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.ā
Intent (p. 97): āSubstantial evidenceā indicates that Trumpās efforts were āintended to prevent further investigative structiny of the Presidentās and his campaignās conduct.ā
Mueller declined to prosecute due to the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez, cupcake.
Mueller proceeded correctly and legally which is why he will face no charges. Smith did the opposite.Weird cause Mueller testified he wasnāt obstructed, well before this
More proof that smith was acting illegally with his report
That is what you all construed to satisfy your defeatDid the evidence go poof? No. Care to see some more?
F. Efforts to curtail Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 97): Trumpās effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference āwould qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā āTaken together, the Presidentās directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]ā
Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, āthe existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.ā
Intent (p. 97): āSubstantial evidenceā indicates that Trumpās efforts were āintended to prevent further investigative structiny of the Presidentās and his campaignās conduct.ā
Mueller declined to prosecute due to the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez, cupcake.
If he obtained so much solid evidence then why did he not conclude so yet you somehow feel so?His report contained ample evidence that trump obstructed the investigation. Here's just one example.
E. Efforts to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a ācredible witnessā in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This āwould qualify as an obstructive actā if the firing āwould naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.ā
Nexus (p. 89): āSubstantial evidenceā indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that āhis conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.ā
Intent (p. 89): āSubstantial evidence indicates that the Presidentās attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counselās oversight of investigations that involved the Presidentās conduct[.]ā
Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map
The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitterwww.lawfaremedia.org
They need to start investigations on these judges.There will be a lib loon judge who will try and decree that it wonāt allow these subpoenas
Unfortunately, you're probably right. Some people ARE above the law.You'll still be saying the same thing in 10 years from now.
~~~~~~Hiding? What the **** does that mean?
What is it he is doing differently than he has for the last 8 years?
You have your imagination far ahead of facts.
Here is Obama responding to Trump admin's wild claims:
![]()
Obama slams Trump with rare public rebuke of āoutrageousā theory
Obama "does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," a spokesperson for the former president said. āBut these claims are outrageo...www.yahoo.com