Grand Jury investigating Obama/Russia collusion may be impaneled in Florida due to the FBI raid on President Trump's home

[WEATHER53]

Can you rephrase into proper English? I know its not your first language.

It’s English buddy boy and your shame attempt absent any actual rebuttal has failed as always

 

[struth]

You are completely out to lunch.

Says the guy that had no clue who Epstein was until like five mins ago

 

[sartre play]

If I was corrupt,
What I would do,
is move the investigation to a state that has clearly shown it self, AS TOTALY in the pocket of the Administration.

 

[AntonToo]

Says the guy that had no clue who Epstein was until like five mins ago

Why not simply search my posts with word "Epstein" in it before opening your mouth?

Oh that's right, because you are a total idiot.

 

[struth]

Why not simply search my posts with word "Epstein" in it before opening your mouth?

Oh that's right, because you are a total idiot.

Why because I just read your post when you clearly had no idea who he was and how he was connected to Maxwell

 

[AntonToo]

Why because I just read your post when you clearly had no idea who he was and how he was connected to Maxwell

Yep, total idiot.

If you could actually follow basic instructions you would find my posting about Epstein from 2019

Post in thread 'Acosta erupts & resigns'

Jul 13, 2019

Facts help me sleep at night.

Are you ******* serious? You are one of the craziest bullshit peddlers on this website. Your little politico squerell brain wouldn't know facts if they hit you in the face with a 2x4.

Here in this thread you are again spreading some bullshit Acosta was trying to peddle to save his ass while THE FACTS are that he cut Epstein a very speacial sweetheart deal. THE FACT that he now resigned is basically an admission of guilt.

• AntonToo

 

[struth]

Yep, total idiot.

don’t be so hard on yourself

 

[BackAgain]

Florida. Not the Democrats' safe space in DC, where they can manipulate juries, judges, and witnesses.

I sincerely hope this is accurate.

So, That's Where the Grand Jury for the Russian Collusion Hoax Is Being Impaneled

Grand jury investigation into the Russia collusion hoax begins, raising concerns for Democrats.

townhall.com

Attorney General Pam Bondi has reportedly signed an order to launch a grand jury investigation into the origins and promotion of the Russia hoax by former President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, DNI James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey and more.

The investigation comes after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a number of declassified documents showing President Barack Obama ordered a December 2016 meeting to discuss the so-called "collusion" between then candidate Donald Trump and the Russian government to win the presidential election. That claim - which was made up by the DNC and Clinton campaign to distract from Hillary's criminal mishandling of classified information on a personal email server - was then taken by CIA Director Brennan, the FBI and others in the intelligence community and codified in an official January 2017 intelligence.

This, assuming it pans out, is excellent news.

 

[marvin martian]

THATS NOT COURT YOU IMBECILE.

Of course it is.

158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site.

www.justice.gov

CRM 1-499

158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries​

As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3331(a), the district court in every judicial district having more than four million inhabitants must impanel a special grand jury at least once every eighteen months (unless a special grand jury is then sitting); and the district court must also impanel a special grand jury when the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, or a designated Assistant Attorney General certifies in writing to the chief judge of the district that in his/her judgment, a special grand jury is necessary "because of criminal activity in the district." (See 28 C.F.R. § 0.59 under which the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division is designated to make certifications under 18 U.S.C. § 3331.)

District courts are authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(b) to impanel additional special grand juries when the special grand juries already impaneled have more business than they can properly handle. When impaneling additional special grand juries, a court should make a finding as to the need; and a court should always make it clear that the special grand jury is being impaneled under 18 U.S.C. § 3331 (and is therefore not subject to the limitations of a regular grand jury). See Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1975).

The special grand jury has a duty under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) "to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district." Such alleged offenses may be brought to the jury's attention by the court or by any attorney appearing for the United States to present evidence to the jury. It is incumbent upon any such government attorney to whom it is reported that a Federal offense was committed within the district, if the source of information so requests, to refer the information to the special grand jury, naming the source and apprising the jury of the attorney's action or recommendation regarding the information.

 

[Marener]

Amazing how you can write a blog post complaining dumb shit said on Twitter.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It’s English buddy boy and your shame attempt absent any actual rebuttal has failed as always

Also, proper grammar and punctuation are always helpful.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Of course it is.

158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site.

www.justice.gov

CRM 1-499

158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries​

As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3331(a), the district court in every judicial district having more than four million inhabitants must impanel a special grand jury at least once every eighteen months (unless a special grand jury is then sitting); and the district court must also impanel a special grand jury when the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, or a designated Assistant Attorney General certifies in writing to the chief judge of the district that in his/her judgment, a special grand jury is necessary "because of criminal activity in the district." (See 28 C.F.R. § 0.59 under which the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division is designated to make certifications under 18 U.S.C. § 3331.)

District courts are authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(b) to impanel additional special grand juries when the special grand juries already impaneled have more business than they can properly handle. When impaneling additional special grand juries, a court should make a finding as to the need; and a court should always make it clear that the special grand jury is being impaneled under 18 U.S.C. § 3331 (and is therefore not subject to the limitations of a regular grand jury). See Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1975).

The special grand jury has a duty under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) "to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district." Such alleged offenses may be brought to the jury's attention by the court or by any attorney appearing for the United States to present evidence to the jury. It is incumbent upon any such government attorney to whom it is reported that a Federal offense was committed within the district, if the source of information so requests, to refer the information to the special grand jury, naming the source and apprising the jury of the attorney's action or recommendation regarding the information.

That's not a trial. You stand head and Shoulders over the other idiots on this forum.

 

[struth]

That's not a trial. You stand head and Shoulders over the other idiots on this forum.

He didn’t say it was a trial. He was responding to the idiot that claimed it wasn’t in court

 

[1srelluc]

I look forward to seeing Obama, who set race relations back 60 years, pay for some of his many transgressions.

At best he will be named as an unindicted co-conspirator.

 

[AntonToo]

At best he will be named as an unindicted co-conspirator.

Best is you not talking about Epstein.

Thats best for this administration.

 

[Foolardi]

Dorklepuss face Maddow started off her monday 9 pm
segment trying to downplay this Jack Smith potential
trial.It's what MSNBC does.The worst cable outlet in history.
I wonder when Big mouth Adult brat Jasmine Crockett will
be on.Charlie Kirk is spot-on.She is the darling of the Democrat
brats because of her hateful spite about the White population.
I doubt white brat Lawrence O]Donnell wants to have her on his
hour.But Maddow may.

 

[marvin martian]

That's not a trial. You stand head and Shoulders over the other idiots on this forum.

No one said it was trial, dipshit. Many things besides trials occur in court. Like grand jury empanelment.

 

[Foolardi]

Best is you not talking about Epstein.

Thats best for this administration.

It so overcooked { this beligerent obsession with these Epstein
files.}That these guttersnipe cowards at MSNBC live to deflect
from any possible Harm to their precious Democrat allegiance.

 

[Foolardi]

No one said it was trial, dipshit. Many things besides trials occur in court. Like grand jury empanelment.

The " supposed Trials " that Donald Trump was forced into will go down
in written history as the Worst example by a Party { Democrats }
to Persecute their perceived enemy.Trump never had as much as a
Misdomeaner.
Democrats are lower than low.Slugs out in the morning dew grass
are far more civil and humane.

 

[Zincwarrior]

He didn’t say it was a trial. He was responding to the idiot that claimed it wasn’t in court

Not in court, a court trial.