A grand jury has just been ordered to investigate the Trump-Russia Collussion Obama Deep Staters

Try developing your own material rather than trying to get a free ride on others creations
Limbaugh was a pro at creating a permission structure. You can believe whatever you want. You don’t need to ground your belief in facts.
 
Limbaugh was a pro at creating a permission structure. You can believe whatever you want. You don’t need to ground your belief in facts.
Rush exposed the media complicity that you all feel does not exist
 
Limbaugh was the poster child for complicit media. Look at how he promoted and defended the Iraq war.


"The New York Times ran a number of articles describing Saddam Hussein's attempts to build weapons of mass destruction. The 8 September 2002 article titled "U.S. Says Hussein Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts" would be discredited, leading The New York Times to issue a public statement admitting it was not as rigorous as it should have been."

 
People believe a whole lot of stuff that simply ain't so. Like calling it "treason" when a political campaign gets investigated for reportedly accepting help from a foreign adversary, especially when that suspicion turned out to have some merit. Treason is a very specific charge. It means actively working against your country, and Trump wasn't, and isn't (although he, and his supporters seem to want to equate Trump's needs and wants to those of the country), not being investigated by your own government.

And let’s not forget: the fact that the Trump campaign was under investigation didn’t even come out until after the election. So the idea that this was all some grand attempt to sway the election kind of runs up against the concept of linear time.
How many times did Brennen and a couple others that are looking at hard time now call Trump a traitor and clearly using the word treason? The media that they worked for talking heads also said the same thing many times. If you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. They brought this on themselves. Didn't think. They are doing the same thing with the Epstein nonsense too trying to make Trump out to have been involved at Epstein's Island. They are going to get drug through the mud on this one as it comes out that the Obama Cartel is guilty of insurrection treason.
 
The sky is blue(or appears so). That’s a fact. Think it’ll send anyone to jail?
You never know for sure these days. I'm sure Hillary will try something even paying off jurors or killing them off. Wicked woman and can't be trusted.
 
The falsely called Russian influence has been completely discredited yet you weaklings still cling to it

They literally don't have anything else.
They had an entire stolen presidency to do glorious things to take the country's mind off of President Trump.
But nope, they kept President Trump front and center and demanded that we put him back into office.
So, we did.
Gave him a truly significant win and a mandate.
 
Nobody is saying the fact we saw Clinton and the DNC corruption didn’t help Trump

If the Russians actually wanted Trump to win, they would have leaked all the negative information that they had on Clinton.
Even the Hildabeast could not have overcome that.
She would have had to drop out as Joe did.
 
Yes according to him because Epstein "stole" among others a girl who was trafficked by him. That's his word for it. It wasn't because she what trafficked. No it was because she was "stolen" , like a piece of property.

And the person who did the deed is now in club fed because the TRUMP DOJ has moved her from an actual prison.

Imagine for a second of Biden moved a high profile child trafficker from a normal prison like that.

No...dumb shit....she worked in the spa at Mar A Lago, you lying ass. The woman in question said that Maxwell convinced her to leave Mar A lago to work for epstein, you dope.
 
Mac and Marener will never get over Rush

Rush showed the world that the narrative that was slickly produced by the Democrat Media Bubble wasn't necessarily the truth.

Before that they didn't have to defend anything that might hurt a Democrat, because that information never saw the light of day.

Easy Peasy when your side has total control over the free flow of information.
 
How many times did Brennen and a couple others that are looking at hard time now call Trump a traitor and clearly using the word treason? The media that they worked for talking heads also said the same thing many times. If you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. They brought this on themselves. Didn't think. They are doing the same thing with the Epstein nonsense too trying to make Trump out to have been involved at Epstein's Island. They are going to get drug through the mud on this one as it comes out that the Obama Cartel is guilty of insurrection treason.
Do you honestly think I care who calls whom a traitor on TV? I don’t play team sports. I care whether the accusation has any logical or legal basis. Treason is a specific charge, not a buzzword for cable hosts or angry forum posts. If Maddow or Tucker throws it around, it means nothing in a courtroom.

So the idea that Brennan, or anyone else, is about to be charged with treason because talking heads used the word is just flat-out delusional.

For reference, the Trump DOJ already tried to go after McCabe. Not for treason, mind you, they just wanted to punish a political enemy. When they couldn't get an indictment out of the Grand Jury, they refused to drop it until a judge told them: “charge him or drop it.” They dropped it. That’s what happens when fantasy collides with legal reality.

And here’s the real kicker, I haven’t seen a single coherent explanation of what you actually think Brennan did that would be chargeable. Vague vibes and Fox News segments don’t count.

As for Epstein: what plot are you even talking about? The reporting came from the Wall Street Journal. That’s Murdoch-owned. Same guy who owns FOX News. So the idea that this is some kind of Democratic hit job, when Democrats aren’t even in power, is incoherent.

This isn’t a courtroom. It's a message board. But even here, basic logic still applies.
 
Last edited:
No...dumb shit....she worked in the spa at Mar A Lago, you lying ass. The woman in question said that Maxwell convinced her to leave Mar A lago to work for epstein, you dope.


Well if I'm lying this guy is an imposter. What do you think, this Trump or not?
 
Do you honestly think I care who calls whom a traitor on TV? I don’t play team sports. I care whether the accusation has any logical or legal basis. Treason is a specific charge, not a buzzword for cable hosts or angry forum posts. If Maddow or Tucker throws it around, it means nothing in a courtroom.

So the idea that Brennan, or anyone else, is about to be charged with treason because talking heads used the word is just flat-out delusional.

For reference, the Trump DOJ already tried to go after McCabe. Not for treason, mind you, they just wanted to punish a political enemy. A judge told them: “charge him or drop it.” They dropped it. That’s what happens when fantasy collides with legal reality.

And here’s the real kicker, I haven’t seen a single coherent explanation of what you actually think Brennan did that would be chargeable. Vague vibes and Fox News segments don’t count.

As for Epstein: what plot are you even talking about? The reporting came from the Wall Street Journal. That’s Murdoch-owned. Same guy who owns FOX News. So the idea that this is some kind of Democratic hit job, when Democrats aren’t even in power, is incoherent.

This isn’t a courtroom. It's a message board. But even here, basic logic still applies.

I understand that ignorance is your currency - but-

Murdock was an open Hilliary supporter.
Murdock is not a conservative.
His Sons and Daughter's in law that now run the business, that weren't sold off, are left wing lunatics.
The WSJ editorial board is left wing.

Murdock was/is a businessman -he saw a grossly underserved group of people and he sold a product to them.
That's it.
 
You are more retarded than I remembered.
Billie, if you don't want to believe your lying eyes, that's your problem. I'm sure there are places that help people integrate perception and reality, if that's something you're struggling with.
 
15th post


Well if I'm lying this guy is an imposter. What do you think, this Trump or not?


Are you this stupid in real life...or just when you post...

When a Headhunter finds someone for a job, are they actually cutting off the head of the job candidate?
 
This morning's recap: (ever so briefly)

Prior to the 2016 election President Obama tasked his intelligence agencies to spy on Candidate Trump to see if Russia was assisting Candidate Trump.
The agencies said that Russia was not.
Obama didn't accept that - he tasked them to create a report showing HOW they assisted.
They used the Clinton-Steele Dossier as the lynch pin to fabricate the Russian Hoax.

While non-Democrat Media reported most of this at the time they really didn't have the "smoking gun"
Multiple bestselling books that laid out the story - didn't have the smoking gun.
Mueller didn't have the smoking gun
Durham didn't have the smoking gun.
The IG didn't have the smoking gun.
Approximately 5 people knew of the Documents that Tulsi recently declassified -

The documents indicate multiple crimes, of varies levels by various bad actors.
Multiple Criminal Conspiracies

Now a grand jury or juries have been impaneled to see if they believe that the Government should proceed with charges - or if the previous administration is above the law.


Start with the little fish. Get them in front of the grand jury and swear them in.
 
Billie, if you don't want to believe your lying eyes, that's your problem. I'm sure there are places that help people integrate perception and reality, if that's something you're struggling with.

it hasn't helped you.
 
Are you this stupid in real life...or just when you post...

When a Headhunter finds someone for a job, are they actually cutting off the head of the job candidate?

It seems as if it would have to be real world.
 
Back
Top Bottom