The problem isn't my failure to convince you what I said is true. But your claim my statement was false. And when I post independent proof my statement was true, you revert to my initial statement didn't prove anything.
Your problem is your inability to commit logic. You obviously can't convince me of anything using irrationality. Your statement was that the U.N. inspections proved there were no WMDs. They did nothing of the sort. You even admitted that no one believed the U.N. inspectors until the U.S. army invaded Iraq.
Actually many of our allies like france believed them Because france had spies embedded inside Iraq who reported the same thing. And in the end they turned out to be 100% correct.
Once again you fail to back up your claim and feebly attempt to deflect to another topic.
Yes, you did. You just didn’t realize it.
The court cases are "PROOF".
Nope. The one making a claim is the one with the burden of proof, Dumbass.
Six more than those disenfranchised by voter ID.
I see, like Bripat, you failed logic.
Quote the court case that said there are very few instances if vote fraud nationwide.
No, the burden is on the ones making the claim he broke the law. You really are stupid beyond belief.
Ask Obammy
Where you from? Innocent until proven guilty
My point was made, you can’t read
The only court that was asked to look at nationwide fraud, was the US Supreme Court, and they voted 7-2 there was no nationwide fraud. And the 2 only withheld their vote on the principle that they should do more than just read the briefs.
That’s hilarious
You claimed no one believed them. Now your claiming otherwise.
But you said, when somebody makes a claim, such as claiming he's not guilty, that the burden of proof automatically falls upon them.
No one said the fraud was nationwide. Fraud in a few particular ccounties would have been sifficient to overturn the election, moron.
