A Compton, CA city councilman and 5 others were charged with ‘conspiracy to commit election fraud’

No one said it doesn't happen. The argument is that it rarely happens and it's very hard to get away with it. As we see here.

Argument is not fact.

They catch a lot of heroine and meth dealers every year, does that mean every year they catch every single one of them? Or the more likely scenario of them only catching a very small percent every year?

And how do you know it's very hard to get away with? Really now because the last year or so is really the first time the possibility has been brought up on a large scale. It's hard to prove something the first time you really investigate.
 
Argument is not fact.

They catch a lot of heroine and meth dealers every year, does that mean every year they catch every single one of them? Or the more likely scenario of them only catching a very small percent every year?

And how do you know it's very hard to get away with? Really now because the last year or so is really the first time the possibility has been brought up on a large scale. It's hard to prove something the first time you really investigate.

All you have to do is prove your conspiracies. Since you can't............................
 
What does drunk driving have to do with this? What an idiotic comparison.

Name calling? Really?

And it's not pathetic if you actually put your brain to work and think about the statement.

He is saying they catch drunk drivers also, but does that mean they catch all drunk drivers?

So the comparison is fine and makes a reasonable point if you're willing to actually think about something instead of immediately going on the offense.
 
Name calling? Really?

And it's not pathetic if you actually put your brain to work and think about the statement.

He is saying they catch drunk drivers also, but does that mean they catch all drunk drivers?

So the comparison is fine and makes a reasonable point if you're willing to actually think about something instead of immediately going on the offense.
I didn't call you a name I said your comparison is idiotic. But, truth be told you are the idiot who presented it. Drunk driving is nothing, nowhere near voter fraud. Not in the same town, zip code or state.
 
No one said it doesn't happen. The argument is that it rarely happens and it's very hard to get away with it. As we see here.
Democrats have forced snowflakes to change their claims - It used to be 'NO Election Fraud. Now they have to feebly argue, 'Not ENOUGH election fraud.

3 bogus votes were all that were needed to tip the scales by cheating...and they got JUST enough.

Some times a LITTLE bit of cheating is all you / they need.
 
Since there have been small instances now and then there is no one that argues there is NO fraud.

You have to create this argument because you can't prove your conspiracies.
As I said previously, snowflakes used to damn-near argue to the death that election fraud did not exist. Then election fraud was caught / exposed so often - and still is - snowflakes were FORCED to abandon their original argument and switch to ' NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE' ... BUT CASES LIKE THIS PROVE EVEN THAT IS A LIE.

3 votes...it was smart of them to not get greedy & pad the numberd...they fudged just enough.
 
Argument is not fact.

They catch a lot of heroine and meth dealers every year, does that mean every year they catch every single one of them? Or the more likely scenario of them only catching a very small percent every year?

And how do you know it's very hard to get away with? Really now because the last year or so is really the first time the possibility has been brought up on a large scale. It's hard to prove something the first time you really investigate.
You never question the impoverished areas that would have a quick racist charge. Local races have been affected by this over the decades.
 

Forum List

Back
Top