A 193-Million-Year Old Nesting Ground With More Than 100 Dinosaur Eggs Offers Evidence They Lived In Herds

[progressive hunter]

No, they used radioactive dating of the minerals. Talk about someone who isn't knowledgable and yet is trying to mansplain all this.....

not according to the article,, and those test are flawed anyway,,

 

[bodecea]

it lacks proof,,
and as stated in the article the just guessed,,

You never heard of radioactive dating, have you?

 

[bodecea]

the results say its flawed but they do use it for the rocks they use to determine fossil ages,,

Fossils ARE rocks...minerals (over millions of years) have replaced the material of the bones, eggs, etc. And then they radioactive date it.

 

[bodecea]

some men have tits that arent really tits,,

Says who?

 

[progressive hunter]

You never heard of radioactive dating, have you?

yes I have,, and know that its flawed and also designed to give a predetermined date,,

 

[bodecea]

not according to the article,, and those test are flawed anyway,,

Who said those test [sic] are flawed?

 

[progressive hunter]

Says who?

science,,

 

[bodecea]

yes I have,, and know that its flawed and also designed to give a predetermined date,,

No it isn't flawed....it's not precise to a specific year or decade or century, but not flawed. Radioactive material degrades at a set pace...........period.

 

[progressive hunter]

Who said those test [sic] are flawed?

the results say it,, test the same item twice and you get two different results,,

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The recent discovery of a cache of Mosasaurus eggs in Pantagonia constitutes actual physical proof that dinosaurs lived in herds.
I wish I'd said it first but Jurassic Park was not a documentary!

You'd better check your dictionary and discover the difference between proof and supposition, dumb
fucker.

No, it is still speculation, as there is no proof other than said speculation. Which is why in 1993, there was speculation that dinosaurs were warm blooded not cold, but also speculated that they also had feathers.

 

[bodecea]

science,,

Your link isn't working.

 

[progressive hunter]

No it isn't flawed....it's not precise to a specific year or decade or century, but not flawed. Radioactive material degrades at a set pace...........period.

it degrades based on environment,, and no one can know what the environment was over those millions of yrs,,

 

[westwall]

This is interesting.

I didn't know this was found in the 70s but it took years to actually investigate and study it.

What they have found thus far is very interesting.

It's an interesting article and wanted to share it with the board.

A 193-million-year old nesting ground with more than 100 dinosaur eggs offers evidence they lived in herds

If you would like to read the first book on the modern era of dinosauer research, that changed the original paradigm that they were cold blooded lizards, to where we now know they were warm blooded, and likely evolved into our modern birds, take a look at "The Dinosauer Heresies".

An excellent book by any measure.

 

[bodecea]

the results say it,, test the same item twice and you get two different results,,

How far apart?

 

[bodecea]

it degrades based on environment,, and no one can know what the environment was over those millions of yrs,,

Radioactive materials degrade based on environment? Link that info for us......would be VERY useful in speeding up the degradation of radioactive waste if what you say is true.

 

[progressive hunter]

Your link isn't working.

that makes you brain dead cause I didnt post a link,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Radioactive materials degrade based on environment? Link that info for us......would be VERY useful in speeding up the degradation of radioactive waste if what you say is true.

are you saying they degrade the same regardless of environment??

 

[Dana7360]

What makes you imagine the date of those dinosaur eggs was made with a predetermined
age in mind? That's very goofy.

The person you replied to didn't read the article and is trying to dispute science.

You can't reason with people like that.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The person you replied to didn't read the article and is trying to dispute science.

You can't reason with people like that.

Is that the same science that says men with tits are women?

 

[progressive hunter]

The person you replied to didn't read the article and is trying to dispute science.

You can't reason with people like that.

I did read it and gave a quote that proved my point,,

science requires observation,, who observed anything 193 million yrs ago??

your science says a man can change into a women and give birth, so dont talk to me about science,,